'loop' 검색 결과

Run a bounded, provider-neutral SDD Composy correction loop on one approved task (EXECUTE, QA, EVIDENCE, REVIEW, VERIFY; at most 3 iterations) with explicit approval, safe-stop guards, and fresh verification. Use to continue an approved TASK autonomously — 'rodar o loop na TASK-003', 'continuar a task até passar', 'start a loop on task 4'. Do NOT use for the host's recurring loop runner, for fleets (sdd-fleet), or for a task without human approval.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agent fallback for CEngineServiceMgr__MainLoop (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CEngineServiceMgr::_MainLoop in the CS2 engine module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CEngineServiceMgr__MainLoop, CEngineServiceMgr::_MainLoop

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agent fallback for CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode in the CS2 engine module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode, CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agent fallback for CEngineServiceMgr_DeactivateLoop (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CEngineServiceMgr::DeactivateLoop in the CS2 engine module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CEngineServiceMgr_DeactivateLoop, CEngineServiceMgr::DeactivateLoop

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Improve code through repeated experiments against a measurable target, such as execution time or memory use. After defining scope and constraints, the agent tests changes, keeps improvements, reverts unsuccessful attempts, and logs results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reduce execution time through measured code experiments
• Optimize memory use or bundle size
• Compare changes using benchmark results

Turn a feature idea into a detailed implementation plan through research, interviews, and reviews by Gemini and Codex. Produce self-contained work sections with dependencies and acceptance criteria, plus files for supported automated implementation workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Clarifying requirements before feature development
• Reviewing an implementation plan with multiple AI models
• Splitting development work into self-contained sections

Diagnoses applications that fail to start or repeatedly crash on GKE, Google's managed Kubernetes service. It examines logs, events, memory use, image pulls, and connectivity, then proposes configuration patches or commands without applying live changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigate repeated container restarts
• Diagnose memory exhaustion
• Find causes of image pull or scheduling failures

Design loops that improve an agent’s own prompts, workflows, or execution code from failure records. Define bounded edits, preserve candidate histories, and accept changes through independent tests that check improvements and regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing agent self-improvement from failure records
• Defining acceptance checks for self-modifying workflows
• Diagnosing score gaming and stalled improvement

Improve research through up to four rounds of external language model review, fixes, and reassessment. Use an OpenAI-compatible API to identify weaknesses, prioritize changes, and keep a cumulative record of reviewer responses, actions, and experiment results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Identify weaknesses before submitting research
• Revise research using an external model's feedback
• Track review scores, changes, and experiment results

Compare five Codex execution setups on Terminal-Bench 4.0 under matching conditions. The skill covers benchmark configuration, separate verification environments, image preparation, and result interpretation to help identify misleading scores caused by setup errors.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare five Codex execution setups
• Check benchmark network and verification settings
• Prepare task and verifier container images

Detect chromatin loops and point interactions from Hi-C data using cooltools, chromosight, and HiCCUPS-like methods. Identify CTCF-mediated loops and enhancer-promoter contacts. Use when detecting chromatin loops from Hi-C data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:i-have-adhd` or Claude Code `/superloopy:i-have-adhd` invocation, or when a qualifying leading `loopy`/`루피` task receives Superloopy's non-diagnostic ADHD-friendly output overlay. Do not activate from typos, fragmented writing, urgency, grammar, language proficiency, or ordinary discussion of ADHD, attention, focus, accessibility, or cognitive load.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use Superloopy's lightweight strict-evidence loop for Codex tasks that need durable progress, criteria, and artifact-backed completion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component verify → CP-4 integration verify (full lane) → CP-5 acceptance. The worker never grades its own homework; evidence rows trace back to AC-n. Opt-in: invoke with /closed-loop or by asking for the closed loop, proper verification, or an evidence trail. Ordinary work does not run this.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Shared loop-engineering reference for COG skills - the agent loop, deterministic verifiers, termination conditions, in-loop context management, and named patterns. Invoke when designing or debugging a skill that iterates (search-verify-retry, scan-until-dry, fetch-retry-gate).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect growth loops in the business and model each loop's amplification by script. "what growth loops do we have"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when starting any conversation in a loopkit-enabled project - establishes how to find and use loopkit's 49 skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design referral programs and viral growth loops. Use when asked to create referral systems, viral mechanics, word-of-mouth campaigns, or growth loops. Trigger phrases: "referral program", "viral loop", "refer a friend", "word of mouth", "viral coefficient", "referral incentive", "growth loop", "invite system", "ambassador program".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and `npm test` are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches ~/.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote RPC (--mode rpc JSONL stdio), TUI smoke (node-pty on Windows, tmux on POSIX), mock loop (a local fake model server for deterministic, zero-token agent-loop runs), and CLI smoke (--help/--print/--list-models). Every helper ships a --self-test. Use whenever someone says qa senpi, test the agent, verify my change, rpc qa, tui qa, mock-loop qa, smoke the cli, or needs evidence that an agent-loop, tool, keybinding, or provider change works end to end. Capture evidence to local-ignore/qa-evidence/.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Iterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use when implementing features, writing specs, reviewing existing code, or completing any task where quality matters more than speed. Trigger phrases: "use review-loop", "polish this", "iterate on this", "/review-loop", "review with feedback loop".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the user asks to 'review and address in a loop', 'iterate review until approved', 'auto review-and-fix this PR', 'loop /ocr:review and /ocr:address', or to take a changeset all the way to a clean APPROVE with the default reviewer team. Wraps the /ocr:review (.ocr/commands/review.md) and /ocr:address (.ocr/commands/address.md) skills; needs a feature branch with an open GitHub PR and the gh CLI for posting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decides hand-vs-compiler for loop transforms (unrolling, SIMD, fusion, branchless). Use when reviewing/authoring a hot loop or tempted to hand-optimize one.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cost discipline for recurring /loop runs. A loop multiplies per-iteration cost by iteration count, so waste compounds. Encodes cache-aware pacing (avoid the 300s dead zone), event-driven-over-polling, a no-change short-circuit, a compact state handle carried between ticks, and a stop condition. Use when a /loop is running or being set up — especially long-lived or frequently-firing ones.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage the deferred-work ledger for the bmad-loop orchestrator: verify every selected open entry against the actual codebase and return a machine-readable partition (bundles, already-resolved, blocked, skip, human decisions). Also migrates legacy pre-DW-format ledgers when invoked with --migrate. Automation-only — invoked by bmad-loop sweep runs, not by humans.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.