'prototype' 검색 결과

Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, system-design, ddia-systems - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, IMPROVE-CODE-QUALITY-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to harden an AI-generated prototype, add tests before refactoring, make code safe to change, or says 'this works on my machine but I am scared to touch it'. For an aged codebase, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product and UX pass, improve-app; to optimize speed and structure, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a playable prototype in about an hour to answer one question — is it fun? — with greybox primitives, a hard timebox, and explicit keep/kill criteria. Use when prototyping a mechanic, making a vertical slice or MVP, greyboxing/blockout, or judging throwaway vs keep.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Take a board game idea from 'wouldn't it be cool if' to a playtestable prototype — core loop, tension source, components you can make tonight, balance starting-points, and a real playtest protocol with kill criteria. Use when someone says 'I have a board game idea', 'design a game about X', 'my game drags in the midgame', or 'how do I playtest this'. Produces a design one-pager, a print-and-play prototype spec, and a 3-session playtest plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan and run usability tests on existing or prototype designs including test design, task scripts, moderation, observation, and findings synthesis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to test usability, run a moderated test, run an unmoderated test, validate a design, find usability issues, or improve task completion. Triggers on usability test, usability testing, moderated test, unmoderated test, task script, think aloud, prototype testing, user testing, design validation, task completion. Also triggers when the user has built something and wants to know if real users can use it before shipping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trigger for: OT project description, OTA scope, Research OT under 10 U.S.C. 4021, Prototype OT under 10 U.S.C. 4022, follow-on production scope under 10 U.S.C. 4022(f), milestone-based project scope, prototype objective, phase or go/no-go structure, BAA white-paper conversion, SOO conversion, transition planning, or scope reduction before OT cost analysis. Produce a milestone-based .docx plus a separate chat-only handoff to OT Cost Analysis. Use TRL only when the project supports it. Never place cost estimates, funding profiles, contribution calculations, prices, or skill-routing content in the document. Do NOT use for a FAR SOW/PWS, OT cost analysis, IGCE, agreement terms and conditions, or an Agreements Officer's authority, participant-status, successful-completion, or follow-on determination.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate several genuinely different throwaway variations (designs, approaches, drafts) for the user to react to. Use when the user can only recognize what they want by seeing it — visual design, UX flows, naming, tone — or asks to brainstorm or prototype before building.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design one-off HTML artifacts (landing, deck, prototype).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill whenever the user asks for an HTML-first visual design deliverable or design judgment: interactive prototype, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, landing page, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand system, design critique, multi-variant exploration, or export to MP4, GIF, PPTX, PDF, or SVG. It is optimized to make AI agents do the routing, template selection, verification, and export prep so humans spend less time prompt-engineering. Do not use for production web apps, SEO sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

红队渗透 / 攻防 — 受授权的红队作业者 + 渗透测试工程师 + 攻击型安全顾问的认知操作系统 (侦察 OSINT / 外网渗透 / 内网 AD 渗透 BloodHound + Kerberoasting + ADCS 利用 + 横向移动 / Web 应用渗透 OWASP WSTG / 移动 OWASP MASTG / 云渗透 AWS Azure GCP IAM 路径 + 容器逃逸 + K8s / C2 操作 Cobalt Strike Sliver Mythic Havoc + OPSEC / 初始访问 + AV EDR 绕过 (仅授权场景) / 无线 RF / 物理社工 / 报告与整改 / 框架 MITRE ATT&CK + D3FEND + PTES + OSSTMM + NIST 800-115 + Kill Chain / 法律伦理 CFAA + 网络安全法 + 刑法 285 286 + 数据安全法 + GDPR + 授权书 + 范围 + 交战规则 — 不含 黑产 / 未授权攻击 / 大规模 exploitation / 供应链投毒 / 未授权 DoS — 这是 重罪 + 行业封杀 + 律师吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界 — 也不含 蓝队 SOC + 恶意软件 即服务 / 僵尸网络 / 勒索软件作者 — 这是 cybercrime 不是 红队) (Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasion (phishing infrastructure, payload development, AV / EDR evasion, BYOVD, AMSI / ETW bypass — strictly for authorized engagements), (i) wireless / RF (WPA2/3, evil twin, Wi-Fi pivots), (j) physical / social engineering (badge cloning, pretexting, vishing — under engagement letter), (k) reporting & remediation (executive summary, technical findings, CVSS, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, retest), (l) frameworks & methodology (MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE D3FEND, PTES, OSSTMM, NIST SP 800-115, OWASP WSTG / MASTG, Cyber Kill Chain, Unified Kill Chain, Diamond Model), (m) law & ethics (CFAA US, Computer Misuse Act UK, 中国 刑法 285/286 + 网络安全法 + 数据安全法, GDPR for tested EU systems, engagement letter, scope, rules of engagement, safe harbor for bug bounty); NOT criminal hacking / 黑产 / unauthorized targeting / mass exploitation / supply-chain compromise / DoS against unconsented systems (这是 重罪 + 业内开除 + 律师执照吊销, 本 skill 严守 authorized-only 边界), NOT pure defensive blue team / SOC analyst tradecraft (是 平行学科, 仅做 边界标注 + ATT&CK 反推方向), NOT malware-as-a-service development / botnet ops / ransomware authoring (是 cybercrime 不是 红队), NOT 'ethical hacking' 在 'just curious 看看' 自我合理化的灰色操作 (违反 authorization 原则即不是 红队).) Master OS — automated mastery of Cybersecurity Red Team / Offensive Security Operations — the cognitive operating system of authorized red team operators, penetration testers, and offensive security consultants covering (a) reconnaissance & OSINT (passive + active discovery, asset surface mapping), (b) external network pentest (perimeter, exposed services, web), (c) internal network / Active Directory pentest (AD enumeration via BloodHound, Kerberos abuse — Kerberoasting / AS-REP-roasting / Unconstrained delegation / S4U2self, NTLM relay, ADCS abuse, GPO abuse, lateral movement, privilege escalation), (d) web application pentest (OWASP WSTG, authentication, authorization, SSRF, XXE, deserialization, SSTI, prototype pollution, GraphQL, JWT, API), (e) mobile pentest (OWASP MASTG, iOS / Android, instrumentation Frida / Objection, MASVS), (f) cloud pentest (AWS / Azure / GCP — IAM enumeration, privilege escalation paths, container escape, K8s RBAC, serverless), (g) C2 operations & post-exploitation (Cobalt Strike / Sliver / Mythic / Havoc, beacon ops, malleable profiles, OPSEC), (h) initial access & evasi

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Composes single-file HTML artifacts (PR review writeups, status reports, incident postmortems, slide decks, design systems, prototypes, flowcharts, module maps, feature explainers, kanban boards, prompt tuners) from a small JSON spec instead of hand-written HTML/CSS/JS. Use when the user asks to "compare options side-by-side", requests an HTML version of a report or review or deck, asks for a flowchart, status update, postmortem, design system reference, interactive prototype, custom editor — or explicitly says "HTML artifact", "single HTML file", "self-contained HTML". Skip for ad-hoc HTML snippets (forms, emails, embedded widgets) where there's no template fit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Rapid prototyping workflow. Skips normal standards to quickly validate a game concept or mechanic. Produces throwaway code and a structured prototype report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Facilitate a full design-thinking engagement (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) grounded in real user evidence. Use whenever the user wants to understand users deeply and design a solution for them: "run design thinking", "understand our users", "design user interviews", "synthesize these interview notes", "build personas", "write How-Might-We questions", "prototype this concept", "design a usability test", "our users are churning and we don't know why", in any language ("tư duy thiết kế", "nghiên cứu người dùng", "phỏng vấn khách hàng", "デザイン思考", "设计思维"), even when they never say "design thinking". Also use when the user drops raw interview notes, transcripts, or survey exports and wants insights, personas, or product decisions. Not for "is there a market for X" desk questions (market-researcher).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Living catalogue of 7 known hazard entries (SE-01 through SE-07) specific to agent-studio: Windows backslash paths, prototype pollution, hook exit codes, async swallowing, ReDoS in glob-to-regex, DST arithmetic, array mutation during iteration. Each entry: symptom, root cause, fix, test assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design and prototype in Paper Design (app.paper.design) — read/write designs via MCP, convert to React/Tailwind code, import HTML/CSS, sync design tokens. Also covers Paper Shaders (@paper-design/shaders-react) — 30+ shader React components (mesh gradient, fluted glass, liquid metal, god rays, halftone, grain gradient, pulsing border). Pairs with minoan-frontend-design for creative direction. Triggers on Paper Design, paper.design, design-to-code, artboard, Paper Shaders, Paper MCP, prototype.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design and build runnable iOS UI mockups in SwiftUI, including UI direction, multiple visual or interaction variants, realistic sample data, state switching, Xcode Previews, and Simulator validation. Use when the user wants to explore what an iOS screen should look like, compare SwiftUI UI ideas, create a clickable native prototype, validate an app flow before production implementation, or asks for a SwiftUI mock, iOS mockup, native prototype, 画面モック, UI案, SwiftUIで動くモック, or 実際に触れるiOSモック.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate or review a Claude Design brief and convert its output into a deterministic SwiftUI implementation handoff with native iOS layout, tokens, states, transitions, and accessibility rules. Use for Claude Design mobile prototypes, three-screen iOS concepts, Design-to-Claude-Code handoffs, or when a visual prototype must be buildable without interpretation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when /polished-web-prototype runs or a user builds an artifact from a mockup, design plan, or brief. Not for variant galleries: use design-variants. Not for live audits: use web-design-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Maintain an existing Proto UI Prototype or implement a governed Base or design-language component slice. Use for governed component behavior, anatomy, inheritance, exports, CLI registration, style projection, demos, or public preview work. Do not use to admit a new semantic subject or invent Base ownership from a component name.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.