'restructure' 검색 결과

Tend the Allium garden. Use when the user wants to write, edit, update, add to, improve, clarify, refine, restructure, fix or migrate Allium specs. Covers adding entities, rules, triggers, surfaces and contracts, fixing syntax or validation errors, renaming or refactoring within specs, migrating specs to a new language version, and translating requirements into well-formed specifications. Pushes back on vague requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Convert an existing prose, flat, or loosely organized mathematical proof into a source-mapped Lamport-style hierarchy without repairing or completing its mathematics. Use when a submitted proof needs a traceable hierarchical rendering before a forward Lamport audit or for clearer presentation. Do not use to invent a proof, certify validity, or restructure an already hierarchical proof merely to audit it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure code while preserving behavior. Use for extraction, consolidation, ownership moves, or cleanup where verification must bracket structural edits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Silently restructures the user's natural-language prompt into the format the model CURRENTLY running this skill handles best, then answers. On activation it identifies which model family is executing it (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, GLM, Command, Nova, or Phi) and loads that one model's official strategy — so the optimization always matches the model that actually runs it. Activate with /prompt-refine. Use when users want better answers without learning prompt engineering.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ADHD-friendly output formatting. Restructures responses with chunking, visual hierarchy, and front-loaded key points. Modes: clean, flow (default), zen. Use when user says "hyperfocus", "focus mode", "adhd mode", "adhd friendly", or invokes /hyperfocus.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Author and own ONE system's design document (the A–K SYSTEM GDD) at .unikit/gamedesign/systems/SYS-<slug>.md — the depth layer of the GDD, single-system scope. Create the skeleton and walk the collaborative section-cycle to write its parameters, rules, formulas, and acceptance criteria ("detail the combat system", "write the GDD for the inventory system", "fill in the rest of this system doc", "spec out the parameters of X"), AND revise it after approval under the delta discipline ("raise the damage by 10%", "tune the economy", "rework the status system", "nerf X", "change this rule") — a number change is Tuning, a small rule a Tweak, restructuring a Rework; each bumps the version and logs the delta. To add a NEW system or restructure the system map use /unikit-gd-spec; to edit GAME.md content use /unikit-gd-spec; the moment an edit also touches a second system, a content type, a flow, or GAME.md (two or more zones) use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a brand-new game concept use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write, restructure, or review documentation — tutorials, how-to guides, reference pages, concept/explanation docs, API references, READMEs, changelogs, release notes, and troubleshooting guides. Distills documentation craft from Mintlify's guides (compiled from technical writers at Stripe, GitHub, Amplitude, and Anaconda), the Diátaxis framework (including the compass and per-type voice), the Google and Microsoft style guides, Every Page Is Page One, Write the Docs, and Docs for Developers: audience analysis, content-type selection, style and word-level rules, procedure writing, structure for humans and AI agents, code-example standards, page templates (templates.md), mechanical enforcement and llms.txt (mechanics.md), maintenance, and success metrics. Use this skill when the user asks to "write docs", "document this feature", "improve this page", "review these docs", "write a tutorial / how-to / reference page", "structure the docs", "write API documentation", "write a README / changelog", or when authoring any file under a `docs/` tree. For SKMTC docs specifically, this skill governs the *craft* (what makes the page good); the content split between skills, `llms.md`, and the docs tree is governed by `docs/skills/README.md`. Distinct from `skmtc-retro` (captures observations about work) and the `skmtc-*` operational skills (guide doing the work) — this skill guides writing *about* the work for readers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Intelligent refactor command. Triggers: refactor, refactoring, cleanup, restructure, extract, simplify, modernize.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Correct file paths, project layout, and naming conventions. Two modes: advisory (return a path) and organize (restructure).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when creating files and need the correct path, organizing project layout, or enforcing naming conventions. Two modes: advisory (return path) and organize (restructure).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Establish, author, restructure, or audit human-first processor Architecture, Design, Research, Review, and Verification documentation. Use for progressive documentation scaffolding, authority maps, reading paths, document-type content contracts, length-budgeted splitting, or maintainability reviews. Do not use as a substitute for cycle-accurate microarchitecture analysis or RTL implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[Workflow] Restructure existing code while preserving observable behavior, proven by baseline and final tests plus change review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a codebase or subsystem for architecture simplification - shallow or pass-through modules, scattered concepts, naming drift, sibling workflows that disagree, weak test seams. Use when the user asks what to simplify or restructure. Not for a narrow fix or for implementing an already chosen design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze, design, write, revise, translate, and review empirical or technical research papers through an evidence-bounded dialectical workflow. Use when Codex must develop a research question, integrate reference papers with a user's ideas, build phenomenon-mechanism-conditions reasoning, design methods or experiments, restructure or edit a manuscript, translate Chinese academic text into restrained English, answer reviewers, or run multi-round peer-review convergence without fabricating evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Framework for rolling out organizational changes without chaos. Covers the ADKAR model adapted for startups, communication templates, resistance patterns, and change fatigue management. Handles process changes, org restructures, strategy pivots, and culture changes. Use when announcing a reorg, switching tools, pivoting strategy, killing a product, changing leadership, or when user mentions change management, change rollout, managing resistance, org change, reorg, or pivot communication.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit, rename, and polish a GitHub repository across its local checkout and remote settings. Use when Codex needs to synchronize a local and GitHub repository name, set the description, homepage URL, or topics, create repository branding and a GitHub social preview, restructure a README, or prepare and publish a cohesive repository identity. Uses GitHub CLI for supported remote operations and delegates visual identity work to $create-context-aware-logos.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a governed R&D session — diamond 1 of the double diamond, which defines the problem and names which fan-out artifacts are warranted. Use when the operator pastes external material and says "consider this for gzkit", asks "is there something here gzkit is missing or could improve on", opens an exploratory design discussion whose outcome is not yet known, or asks why a class of defects keeps recurring and how the issues carrying it should be restructured. Ends at a six-row disposition map and operator sign-off; produces no fan-out artifact itself. Operator-invoked only.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure an always-loaded rules file such as CLAUDE.md or MEMORY.md: build a top block of key rules plus numbered categories, move rule bodies verbatim with a script that proves zero byte loss, fold heavy mechanics into trigger-plus-pointer form, then guards, a canary window and fleet rollout. For scheduled maintenance, not ad-hoc trimming. Triggers: "/canon-revision", "revise the canon".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Polish, restructure, or translate academic prose into Nature-leaning English using writing-strategy principles, curated Nature/Nature Communications article patterns, and phrase-level support from Academic Phrasebank. Use whenever the user asks to polish a manuscript paragraph, abstract, introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, title, methods section, or Chinese academic draft for publication-quality English. Also covers LaTeX layout/typesetting (排版) fixes — loose or sparse pages, stranded section headings, figures that don't fill the page or split across pages, "Float too large", multi-panel figure arrangement, and Supplementary Information that looks empty — via references/latex-layout.md. Also trigger on general academic/scientific writing requests even without the word "Nature", including academic writing, scientific writing, SCI/paper writing, English manuscript polishing, language editing, proofreading, and Chinese phrasings such as 学术写作、科研写作、论文润色、写paper、SCI写作、英文论文润色、语言润色、润色、改写、学术英语、英文写作.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Control risky structural change by proving a refactor is necessary and that behaviour, contracts, data, security boundaries, and operational properties can be preserved through a staged migration. Use whenever the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, modernise, extract, migrate, rewrite, or re-architect existing code, or asks whether they should. Prefer this over starting the refactor. DO NOT REFACTOR is a first-class outcome. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving necessity and behavioural preservation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.