'ropa' 검색 결과

Use when you need to implement or improve distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry in Java — including trace/span modeling, context propagation, semantic conventions, span attributes/events/status, sampling strategy, baggage usage, privacy safeguards, and backend integration with OTLP collectors. This should trigger for requests such as Improve tracing; Apply OpenTelemetry tracing; Add distributed tracing; Refactor tracing instrumentation; Instrument Java services with OpenTelemetry spans. Part of Plinth Toolkit

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Re-ingest-correctness SOP for production RAG. Activate when a calling agent builds, reviews, or debugs an ingestion pipeline that runs more than once over a changing corpus — scheduled re-index, incremental updates, CI re-ingest, or a "retrieval has duplicates / shows deleted docs" bug. Encodes the rule — **ingestion must be idempotent: a document's content hash decides insert/update/skip, so re-running over unchanged docs is a no-op** — plus the docstore + doc-hash upsert machinery (LlamaIndex `IngestionPipeline` + `DocstoreStrategy`), the delete-propagation problem, and cross-framework equivalents (LangChain `index()` + `RecordManager`, manual hash table). ENHANCE overlay over [[llamaindex]]: the IngestionPipeline exists in the base skill but the re-ingest-correctness contract is not surfaced.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Traces execution paths through the code graph with criticality scoring and Mermaid charts. Use when understanding how a function propagates through the system.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when defining or debugging Spring Boot 4 database transaction boundaries, rollback, propagation, optimistic-lock retries, or commit-bound events. For duplicate HTTP commands use idempotency-patterns; for reactive transactions use webflux-reactive-patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when defining or debugging Spring Boot 3 database transaction boundaries, rollback, propagation, optimistic-lock retries, or commit-bound events. For duplicate HTTP commands use idempotency-patterns; for reactive transactions use webflux-reactive-patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide for mobile-specific consent management covering Apple ATT framework for iOS, Android permission model, in-app consent flows, SDK consent propagation to third-party libraries, and IDFA/GAID handling. Addresses platform-specific requirements alongside GDPR and ePrivacy compliance for mobile applications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides systematic review of processing documentation for completeness against GDPR Articles 5, 13-14, 24, 28, and 30. Activate when auditing documentation or preparing for inspections. Keywords: documentation review, processing records, completeness, privacy notices, RoPA.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides implementation of the GDPR accountability principle under Articles 5(2) and 24, including documentation requirements for policies, DPIAs, RoPA, training records, and breach logs. Activate when establishing or reviewing accountability measures, preparing evidence portfolios, or demonstrating compliance to supervisory authorities. Keywords: accountability, Article 5(2), Article 24, documentation, compliance evidence, governance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implements data lineage tracking for privacy compliance including origin tracking, transformation logging, access auditing, deletion verification, and cross-system lineage graphs. Covers source-to-sink mapping, GDPR Art. 30 RoPA integration, automated lineage discovery, and breach impact scoping. Keywords: data lineage, data provenance, data flow mapping, transformation logging, deletion verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manages the organisational DPIA register tracking all Data Protection Impact Assessments across the enterprise. Covers DPIA lifecycle management, status tracking, review scheduling, Art. 35(11) periodic reassessment, and supervisory authority reporting. Implements a centralised register linking DPIAs to RoPA entries, risk registers, and mitigation plans. Keywords: DPIA register, DPIA tracking, Art. 35(11), review schedule, DPIA lifecycle, centralised register, DPIA portfolio management.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Debug Fastly Compute deployments that appear successful but return stale/wrong responses. Use when: (1) fastly compute publish succeeds but version check shows old version, (2) new endpoints return 404 after deployment, (3) cache-busted requests work but regular requests fail, (4) fastly domain list doesn't show your custom domain. Covers edge propagation timing, cached error responses, and domain management API differences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Instruments code to track the flow of untrusted or sensitive data at runtime, enabling detection of injection vulnerabilities, data leaks, and privilege violations. Use when users need to: (1) Track untrusted input propagation through code, (2) Detect SQL injection, XSS, or command injection vulnerabilities, (3) Identify sensitive data leaks, (4) Monitor privilege escalation paths, (5) Perform dynamic taint analysis for security testing. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with configurable taint sources and sinks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Isotope Geochemist. Use when a task calls for Isotope Geochemist judgment. Reasons from fractionation theory, decay schemes, reservoir mixing, and closure assumptions through standard-sample bracketing, double-spike deconvolution, isochron/Tera-Wasserburg fitting with MSWD, and ISO Guide uncertainty propagation while treating Pb-blank and lab-air contamination, mass bias, Pb loss and inheritance, and open-system resetting as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Metrology Scientist. Use when a task calls for Metrology Scientist judgment. Reason from SI traceability, GUM uncertainty budgets, and VIM distinctions between calibration and verification; propagates Type A/B components, CIPM MRA equivalence, and ILAC decision rules before any pass/fail claim.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Landscape Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Landscape Ecologist judgment. Reasons from scale-explicit pattern-process feedbacks, configuration over composition, and functional rather than graphical connectivity through FRAGSTATS, landscapemetrics, Circuitscape resistance surfaces, NLMR neutral models, and block cross-validation, while treating MAUP grain artifacts, classification error propagation, isolation-by-distance confounding isolation-by-resistance, and resistance surfaces unvalidated by movement as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Community Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Community Ecologist judgment. Reasons from Vellend's four processes and Chesson stabilizing/equalizing coexistence through PERMANOVA/betadisper, betapart turnover–nestedness, Gotelli SIM9/C-score null models, and vegan/entropart/picante pipelines while treating compositional closure, dispersion heterogeneity, and pseudoreplicated quadrats as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Astrodynamicist. Use when a task calls for Astrodynamicist judgment. Reasons from two-body plus perturbation force models through Cowell/Encke propagation, batch LS and EKF orbit determination, SPICE/Horizons ephemerides, CCSDS OEM/CDM exchanges, and TEME–GCRF frame discipline while treating drag, stale TLE/B*, and covariance frame mismatch as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Acoustical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Acoustical Engineer judgment. Reasons from source-path-receiver control, logarithmic decibel levels, and mass-law transmission loss through IEC 61672 Class 1 metering, ISO 9613-2 propagation, SEA/FEM/BEM simulation, and ISO 9612 occupational surveys while treating flanking paths, coincidence dips, tonality penalties, and background-correction errors as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Astrobiologist. Use when a task calls for Astrobiologist judgment. Reasons from habitability, redox disequilibrium, and Bayesian biosignature frameworks through Mars (Perseverance, Viking perchlorate lessons), Europa Clipper ocean worlds, agnostic signatures and the Ladder of Life Detection, while treating abiotic mimics, preservation, and LUCA phylogenomics as constraints—not templates—for extraterrestrial life.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Infer orthologous genes and gene families across species using OrthoFinder3 (HOG-based phylogenetic orthology), SonicParanoid2, Broccoli, ProteinOrtho, OMA / FastOMA hierarchical orthologous groups, eggNOG-mapper, JustOrthologs, and TOGA whole-genome-alignment orthology. Use when building single-copy ortholog sets for phylogenomics, classifying co-orthologs and in/out-paralogs after gene duplication, propagating functional annotation via orthology with awareness of the ortholog conjecture, distinguishing speciation from duplication via gene-tree species-tree reconciliation, computing Quest-for-Orthologs benchmark performance, or running synteny-aware ortholog detection in WGD-affected lineages.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.