스킬 찾기

Find related papers across local PDFs, research notes, and web sources, then summarize their key contributions and relevance. Use existing collections as a starting point, remove duplicates, and search for literature that fills gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find related work for a research topic
• Summarize relevant papers already stored locally
• Combine Zotero highlights with Obsidian research notes

Get critical feedback on research ideas, papers, and experimental results from an external AI reviewer. Repeated discussions help identify unsupported claims, plan missing experiments, and document agreed improvements with priorities and estimated computing costs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find gaps in research claims and evidence
• Plan additional experiments within a computing budget
• Review a paper's structure before submission

Improve research code, results, and paper drafts through repeated review by a second Codex agent. The workflow implements fixes, checks them again, and records assessments and unresolved issues across up to four rounds.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Improve research before submitting a paper
• Repeat fixes and reviews of experimental results
• Track unresolved concerns across review rounds

Turns research reports and experimental results into a paper through outline planning, figure creation, LaTeX drafting, PDF compilation, and review. Produces editable source files and a compiled PDF, with checks connecting claims to evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning a research report into a paper draft
• Creating paper figures and tables from experiment data
• Preparing a manuscript for a target venue

Improve research through repeated Gemini reviews, code changes, experiments, and analysis. The workflow records full feedback and actions, then stops when both the score and readiness criteria are met or the round limit is reached.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Improving research through repeated external reviews
• Implementing and checking fixes for research weaknesses
• Keeping a complete record of reviews and experiments

Turn a research report and experiment results into an English paper with figures, LaTeX source, and a compiled PDF. Coordinate planning, drafting, Gemini reviews, and two revision rounds, preserving PDFs and an improvement log.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning a research report into a paper
• Drafting a paper from experiment results
• Preparing a paper for ICLR, NeurIPS, or ICML

Turn a broad research direction into ranked ideas, a refined proposal, and an experiment plan. The workflow combines literature searches, novelty checks, small pilot experiments, and Gemini review to assess evidence and identify useful next steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Explore concrete ideas within a broad research topic
• Check how proposed ideas differ from prior work
• Compare promising ideas through small pilot experiments

Have Gemini critically review research developed with Codex. Multiple rounds of discussion examine logical gaps, missing experiments, and narrative weaknesses, then turn the findings into experiment plans, paper outlines, and documented research priorities.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Get Gemini feedback on research developed with Codex
• Identify logical gaps and missing experiments
• Develop a paper outline through review discussions

Improve an existing LaTeX paper through two rounds of Gemini review, targeted edits, and PDF rebuilding. Check whether claims match the evidence, resolve notation and presentation issues, and retain review logs and PDF versions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review and revise a completed paper draft
• Align claims with supporting evidence
• Resolve notation and explanation inconsistencies

Turn a research paper into a conference poster using its figures and findings. Produce one HTML/CSS file and a print-ready PDF, with measured layout checks and Gemini reviews of content accuracy and final appearance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Create a conference poster from a research paper
• Redesign an existing research poster
• Check poster claims against the source paper

Develop a vague research approach into a concrete method proposal through repeated Gemini reviews. Keep the original problem and constraints in focus while specifying implementation details, removing unnecessary components, and outlining the minimum experiments needed to test the claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning a vague research approach into a concrete method
• Keeping revisions aligned with the original problem
• Simplifying an overly complex research proposal

Turn a broad robotics research direction into ranked ideas with concrete benchmarks and simulation plans. The workflow combines literature review, novelty checks, and external critique while accounting for hardware access, safety, evaluation metrics, and failure cases.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Explore research topics in manipulation or navigation
• Plan simulation studies before using physical robots
• Check novelty and feasibility of robotics ideas

Create academic architecture diagrams and method illustrations with Gemini image generation. The workflow refines layout and visual style, then uses Claude to inspect arrows, labels, and readability and guide further revisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Illustrating a model architecture for a paper
• Turning a method description into a workflow diagram
• Reviewing diagram arrows and labels

Use Gemini to discover research papers through related problems and alternative terminology. Results are organized into a table with publication details, code links, and short summaries, with filters for year, venue, and available code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Discover papers beyond an exact keyword match
• Find research papers with open-source code
• Find papers from selected years or venues

Explore a broad research direction through literature searches, idea generation, novelty checks, small pilot experiments, and critical review. Receive ranked ideas plus a refined proposal and experiment plan for the leading candidate, with evidence recorded across stages.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Finding concrete ideas within a broad research topic
• Exploring improvements to a reference paper
• Comparing promising ideas through small pilot experiments

Turn a rough idea or an existing prompt into a ready-to-paste instruction for a specific AI tool. The skill clarifies the task, output format, constraints, and success criteria for writing, image generation, or coding agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning a rough idea into an AI prompt
• Improving a prompt for a specific AI tool
• Defining scope and completion criteria for coding agents

Creates figures for machine learning papers from draft text or experiment data. Extracts components for Gemini-generated diagrams, chooses suitable charts with matplotlib or seaborn, and adjusts colors, fonts, and export formats for publication.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turn a method section into an architecture diagram
• Create comparison charts from experiment results
• Plot training loss and accuracy over time

Set up, configure, update, and troubleshoot persistent memory for OpenClaw agents. The plugin stores conversations locally and supports automatic recall, task summaries, reusable skills derived from successful tasks, and a visual memory manager.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Setting up persistent memory for OpenClaw
• Updating or troubleshooting the memory plugin
• Choosing local or external memory search models

Compare two GEO audits, which assess a site's readiness for AI search visibility, and produce a monthly client report. Summarize score changes, crawler access, completed actions, newly discovered issues, and priorities for the following month.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Prepare a monthly GEO progress report for a client
• Compare baseline and current audit scores
• Review completed actions and next month's priorities

Assess a website separately for five AI search services, including ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews. Compare scores, identify gaps in content and platform presence, and receive actions organized by priority and timeframe.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing website readiness across five AI search services
• Reviewing question headings, direct answers, and tables
• Checking brand information across external platforms

Assess a website’s readiness for AI search alongside traditional SEO. Review content citation readiness, crawler access, brand mentions, technical foundations, and structured data, then generate scores, prioritized recommendations, and client reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Audit a website’s readiness for AI search
• Assess a page’s suitability for AI citation
• Check AI crawler access and generate llms.txt

Assess web content for AI citation readiness using a weighted scoring rubric. Get page and section scores, identify passages needing work, and receive concrete suggestions for clearer answers, stronger evidence, and more readable structure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assess an article for AI citation readiness
• Prioritize weak sections for rewriting
• Rewrite openings to answer questions directly

Audit a website for visibility in AI search, including how easily its content can be quoted, technical access, content quality, and structured data. Receive a weighted score out of 100 and a prioritized improvement plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing a website’s readiness for AI search
• Finding crawler access and structured data issues
• Reviewing content credibility and ease of quotation

Turn existing GEO audits, which assess readiness for AI search citations, into one client report. Combine scores, technical and content findings, platform comparisons, and a prioritized action plan written for business owners and marketing leaders.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Combining multiple GEO audits into a client report
• Explaining AI search readiness to business leaders
• Prioritizing improvements by impact and effort