'bench' 검색 결과

Infer orthologous genes and gene families across species using OrthoFinder3 (HOG-based phylogenetic orthology), SonicParanoid2, Broccoli, ProteinOrtho, OMA / FastOMA hierarchical orthologous groups, eggNOG-mapper, JustOrthologs, and TOGA whole-genome-alignment orthology. Use when building single-copy ortholog sets for phylogenomics, classifying co-orthologs and in/out-paralogs after gene duplication, propagating functional annotation via orthology with awareness of the ortholog conjecture, distinguishing speciation from duplication via gene-tree species-tree reconciliation, computing Quest-for-Orthologs benchmark performance, or running synteny-aware ortholog detection in WGD-affected lineages.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Hanna 2021 ClinVar-scale CBE screen benchmarked on BRCA1/2, Cuella-Martin 2021 DDR saturation), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end; 4-7 for ABE7.10), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes CUT&RUN (Skene Henikoff 2017) and CUT&Tag (Kaya-Okur 2019) chromatin profiling data. Handles SEACR vs MACS2 peak calling (with the btaf375 2025 benchmark guidance), pA-MNase vs pA-Tn5 vs pAG-Tn5 chimera differences, E. coli spike-in carryover normalization, IgG-only control logic (no input), characteristic fragment-size signatures (25-75 bp for CUT&Tag), and lower depth requirements (5M reads typical vs 25M for ChIP). Use when calling peaks from CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag, scaling by E. coli spike-in carryover, choosing SEACR norm mode, or comparing CUT&RUN/Tag results to traditional ChIP.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantitative agent evaluation using 4-metric framework (correctness/step_ratio/tool_call_ratio/latency_ratio) with ideal trajectory annotation and capability-categorical taxonomy. Use when measuring agent efficiency, comparing agent variants, or gating new agents through correctness→efficiency phases. Complements harness-eval (SE benchmarks) and evaluator-optimizer (qualitative rubric).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured SE task evaluation using 15 benchmark definitions from claude-code-harness research

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AutoResearch-inspired self-evolution loop for ANY Claude Code skill. Finds flaws, fixes them, benchmarks against a diverse prompt pool (anti-overfitting), and uses blind A/B judging. Fully automated — no human input needed during the loop.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Coordinate eval, benchmark, load-test or batch campaigns on authorized SSH hosts or short-lived rented hosts, with isolated jobs, configured-path canaries, telemetry and evidence. Use manage-remote-resources for paid resource ownership and run-remote-builds for build-only offload.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

lm-eval-harness: benchmark LLMs (MMLU, GSM8K, etc.).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automated compliance checking against CIS, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and SOC 2 benchmarks

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when planning or upgrading an internal skill/workflow for business operations, especially when turning a messy idea into a structured skill plan, migration plan, acceptance checklist, or packaging decision. Particularly useful for Obsidian knowledge base consolidation, workspace migration, content library cleanup, and integrating multiple workbenches into one operating system.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

CLIツール・スクリプトの実行や性能計測を始める前に必ず起動する規律。推測起動・投げっぱなし・既知の失敗の再発・上限なしの待ち続けを防ぐ。ツールやスクリプトを実行して結果を検証するとき、ベンチマーク・性能計測をするとき、性能対策の前後比較を取るとき、実行や計測が長引いて止まらないときに使う。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Explore open-source GitHub repository source trees via web browsing to analyze and compare feature implementations at the code level. Supports two modes: cross-project comparison and single-project deep dive. Use when evaluating how OSS projects implement a specific feature, choosing architecture patterns, or benchmarking implementation strategies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Research and compare how competing products implement a similar feature at the UX and interaction level. Provides structured comparison tables and strategic differentiation recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive, measurement-driven performance optimization for latency, throughput, memory/GC, and tail behavior. Use when the user asks to optimize/speed up, reduce latency (p95/p99), increase throughput/QPS, lower CPU/memory/allocations/GC pauses, profile hot paths, or run a benchmarked perf pass (including JSONL/query-heavy code). Requires before/after measurement on a runnable workload (or an explicit `UNMEASURED` plan) plus a correctness gate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Judge performance or resource claims on real hardware: benchmark design or review, latency, throughput, memory or headroom numbers, and accept-or-reject decisions on optimizations. Not for refactors with no resource claim.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Kova/OpenClaw validation: benchmarks, release gates, scenarios, perf reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use Lingzao creator-content tools for Xiaohongshu/XHS, Douyin, and WeChat official-account public content. Lingzao supports XHS SEO, Xiaohongshu account analysis, benchmark account discovery, viral note breakdown, keyword research, one-stop content packages from keyword/link/image/inspiration material, title and cover optimization, hand-drawn route-map cards, city food maps, travel itinerary maps, life checklist maps, workflow manual maps, creator content workflow, note search, creator search, profile lookup, recent posts, deep profile copy/subtitle analysis, note/article detail, post comments, article stats, related articles, short-video copy extraction, and prompt-based creator image generation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Add tree-sitter language support to codegraph end-to-end — wire the grammar + extractor, write tests, then benchmark extraction quality and retrieval value on 3 popular real-world repos. Use when the user runs /add-lang <language> or asks to add/support a new language (e.g. Lua, Elixir, Zig, OCaml) in codegraph.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start 用户没自己历史时全靠对标，发过历史的用户也建议至少 1 个对标做 sanity check。触发词："学这个账号"/"拆这几个对标视频"/"learn from"/"导入对标账号"/"找对标"。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a 100xprism module's evals to check it triggers correctly and produces good output — "do my skills still trigger correctly," "did this change break a skill." Fans eval cases out to parallel subagents with Haiku-graded pass/fail scorecards. For authoring or benchmarking general-purpose skills, prefer a skill-creator plugin when present.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

What every Ollama timing field means and the arithmetic that turns it into a claim - tokens per second, time-to-first-token, why total_duration is not latency, why a second run is faster, what changes with context length, quantization, GPU offload and parallel requests - plus the reporting rules that make a benchmark a measurement instead of an anecdote.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.