'vision' 검색 결과

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the systems-engineering standards landscape — ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, 24748, 29148, 42010, 15026, 24765; INCOSE SE Handbook & Vision 2035; OMG SysML; SAE/EIA 1001/649/748; ECSS space standards; NATO AAP-48; CMMI; NIST SP 800-160; and more. Contains NO source content: it lists each standard's designation, title, purpose, owning SDO, whether it's redistributable, and where to get it. Use when you need to identify or locate an SE standard — most are paywalled/all-rights-reserved and cannot be packaged, so this points you to the owner (and to the open packs where one exists).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from FAA-STD-025f (Preparation of Interface Documentation). Use for IRD/ICD family definitions, common format and content, IRD shall-requirements, ICD design characteristics, verification/VRTM, and CM/revision/approval of FAA Enterprise Subsystem interfaces. Covers rev F preparation rules only; does not replace FAA-STD-005 drawing/spec prep, Order 1800.66 full CM procedures, or non-FAA interface standards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Operational guide for the NV oOS Dictation desktop companion app (Tauri v2 + Rust, examples/nvoos-dictate) — build/run on Windows/MSVC, the local-first engine track (parakeet/whisper/fastconformer/moonshine/silero-vad), the embedded remote-STT fallback, the Stage-2 polish provider track (disabled/openai_compat/nvoos plus local LM Studio and Ollama), the file/media decode seam (Symphonia 0.5), the live camera + local object-detection/tracking track (Proposals 073 + 075) with an opt-in VLM label-polish layer (Proposal 076), the CDP browser-control agent (feature agent) + FastConformer engine + NV oOS multi-SPA hub, model registry + verification harnesses, the plugins.updater boot-crash config rule, and the full test/clippy gate matrix. Use when building, extending, or debugging the dictation app, adding an engine/model, a polish provider, the browser agent, file/video transcription, camera/vision detection, or VLM relabeling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "log this launch", query a launch date/embargo, record a stage transition, or update submissions/outcomes; curates launch facts through the append-only launches event stream with optimistic revisions and derived dossier/calendar views. Not for RAMP scoring — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for planning tier/window — use launch-tier-planner. 发布台账/发布日历/阶段与禁运期记录

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decomposes a large implementation plan into small-model-sized tasks executed by supervised worker agents in dependency-ordered parallel waves, with a plan-first approval gate inside every task, file-based state for context compaction, and a hard escalation ladder. Use when a master plan or multi-workstream feature is too large for one session and should be executed cheaply by many small agents under frontier-model supervision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automates Flutter iOS and Android deployment using Fastlane. Use when setting up `fastlane match` for iOS certificate and provisioning profile management, automating TestFlight uploads via `upload_to_testflight`, pushing Android releases to Google Play via `upload_to_play_store`, auto-incrementing build numbers, writing Fastfile lanes for Flutter release workflows, integrating Fastlane with GitHub Actions or Codemagic, or configuring App Store Connect API Key and Google Play Service Account JSON credentials.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trace BIRD routing-daemon behavior through the actual C source tree. Use for implementation questions, suspected upstream bugs, parser/keyword origins, filter instructions, protocol state machines, route attributes, birdc commands, stack traces, or BIRD 2 versus BIRD 3 source comparisons. Prefer a local checkout or exact upstream tag/commit and cite concrete files, functions, and revisions. Route config linting to bird-agent and active incidents to bird-troubleshooting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepares mobile releases across Flutter, native Android, native iOS, React Native and Kotlin Multiplatform, including separate Android/iOS artifacts from a shared KMP revision. Covers versions, signing, symbols, store readiness, rollout, release notes and CI/CD. Use for release audits, store submission, build pipelines or rollout planning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write operator-facing and public documentation plans for AI-Controlled Party mixer/Soundcraft Ui24R scene arming. Use for runbooks, rehearsal checklists, show-day checklists, EN/PT docs updates, demo scripts, safety wording, and follow-up documentation revisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build reusable Terraform modules for AWS, Azure, and GCP infrastructure following infrastructure-as-code best practices. Use when creating infrastructure modules, standardizing cloud provisioning, or implementing reusable IaC components.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrate operational workspace setup before implementation slices across scaffold, CI/CD, hosting, and data provisioning shards

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provision hosting targets, configure domains/environments, integrate deployment pipeline, and verify staging access

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scoring rubrics for all 5 pipeline layers (Vision, Architecture, IA, BE, FE). Use when auditing specs, running self-checks, or remediating ambiguity gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provision database infrastructure, initialize migration framework, configure environments, and verify connectivity/migration gates

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Utility — fill the surface stack map in tech-stack.md and provision skills using intelligent resolution. Called by pipeline commands when tech stack info changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when working with Crossplane — crossplane Kubernetes-native infrastructure management. Covers managed resources, compositions, provider configurations, composite resource definitions (XRDs), claims, and provider health. Use when managing Crossplane resources, debugging provisioning failures, inspecting compositions, or auditing cloud resource status.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when working with Aws Sso — aWS IAM Identity Center (SSO) management. Covers SSO instance configuration, permission sets, account assignments, user and group provisioning, session policies, and access auditing. Use when managing single sign-on access to AWS accounts, reviewing permission sets, auditing account assignments, or configuring identity source integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.