'comparison' 검색 결과

Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality control for IMC/MIBI data across pixel, channel, image, slide, and batch levels, covering Poisson-count SNR (cell-level Gaussian-mixture and empty-channel comparison), spillover-matrix QC (the three physical sources), drift and the missing EQ-bead analog, acquisition artifacts, and sample-of-origin batch effects. Use when deciding whether to keep or drop a channel, ROI, or slide, distinguishing a dim antibody from a failed one, reading a spillover matrix, or diagnosing batch-driven clustering before analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build circular genome visualizations using circlize (R), pyCirclize (Python), or Circos (Perl CLI) with ideogram tracks, multi-data tracks (scatter, histogram, heatmap), chord/link arcs for interactions, and explicit circos.clear() between plots. Covers when circular is appropriate vs when Cartesian wins (Cleveland-McGill 1984), karyograms, and chromosome adjacency in chord diagrams. Use when adjacency on the circle conveys meaning — chromosome-level overview, structural variants, Hi-C interactions, cross-genome comparisons.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Add p-value brackets, significance asterisks, and effect-size annotations to distribution plots using ggpubr, ggsignif, and statannotations with correct test selection (parametric vs non-parametric vs paired), multiple-testing adjustment, and rendering of negative results. Use when a boxplot/violin/raincloud needs in-figure statistical comparisons between groups.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identifies super-enhancers from H3K27ac, MED1, or BRD4 ChIP-seq using ROSE, ROSE2, LILY, HOMER -style super, and ENCODE dELS cross-referencing. Handles peak stitching parameters, ranking choices, hockey-stick inflection, marker choice (H3K27ac vs MED1/BRD4), and cross-condition comparison with spike-in normalization. Constructs core regulatory circuitry (Saint-Andre 2016) from SE-encoded TFs. Use when identifying cell-identity / cancer-associated regulatory domains, comparing super-enhancers between conditions, identifying master transcription factor networks, or predicting BET-inhibitor responsiveness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects aberrant splicing in single rare-disease patients vs a control panel using FRASER 2.0 (Bioconductor; Beta-binomial autoencoder on Intron Jaccard Index, default delta cutoff 0.1, q hyperparameter), OUTRIDER (gene-level outlier expression via autoencoder denoising), LeafcutterMD (Dirichlet-multinomial outlier mode of LeafCutter for annotation-free junctions), and DROP (Snakemake pipeline integrating FRASER2 + OUTRIDER + monoallelic expression for clinical diagnostics). The statistical model is fundamentally different from differential splicing — single-sample-vs-cohort outlier detection rather than two-group comparison. Standard tool in EU rare-disease (Solve-RD) and NIH UDN programs. Use when applying RNA-seq to undiagnosed Mendelian disease, validating predicted splice variants in clinical samples, or detecting cryptic splicing in disease tissue.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks about truck purchase financing, leasing options, factoring, fuel surcharge math, lease-purchase agreements, the total-cost-of-ownership (TCO) comparison between buying + leasing, and how owner-operators finance their first truck. Cover Section 179 + Bonus Depreciation tax treatment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when discussing the mobile apps drivers use day-to-day — load boards (DAT, Truckstop), route planners (Trucker Path, CoPilot Truck), expense and per diem apps (Per Diem Plus), parking apps (Park My Truck), maintenance / DVIR apps, and how these stack with the carrier's ELD app.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks about CMV operation types — Dedicated, OTR (Over-the-Road), Regional, Local, and the differences in driver lifestyle, pay, equipment, home time, hours, and customer mix. Reference industry segmentation conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks how to design or improve a fleet safety scorecard — what KPIs to track, how to weight them, telematics signals vs document compliance vs roadside outcomes, monthly cadence, driver-facing vs admin-facing dashboards, gamification considerations, peer-comparison metrics, and how a scorecard ties to insurance premiums + retention. Reference SMS Methodology v3.20 for industry-standard weights.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validates versioned permission requests against a grant scope and records comparison evidence. Activate on 'validate permissions', 'permission check', 'inheritance validation', 'permission matrix', 'security validation'. NOT for runtime enforcement (use dag-scope-enforcer) or isolation management (use dag-isolation-manager).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze hierarchical DAG-like systems by separating undirected substrate from ordering metadata, then classifying diamonds, mixers, shortcuts, and hidden cycle structure. Use for workflow architecture, citation or genealogy DAG comparison, and information-flow diagnosis. NOT for ordinary cycle detection in arbitrary graphs, one-node runtime debugging, or systems with no real ordering constraint.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Tracks cumulative LLM costs across DAG execution and makes real-time decisions to stay within budget. Downgrades models, skips optional nodes, or stops early when cost exceeds thresholds. Use when managing execution budgets, analyzing cost breakdowns, or optimizing model routing for cost. Activate on "cost budget", "too expensive", "reduce cost", "cost optimization", "model downgrade", "budget exceeded". NOT for LLM model selection logic (use llm-router), pricing comparisons across providers, or billing/invoicing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan, evaluate, and adopt agent infrastructure for a named workload. Use for agent runtime/framework selection, agent evaluation or observability plans, memory and tool boundaries, infrastructure cost controls, and organizational adoption. Covers workload-first comparison, risk and recovery planning, held-out evaluation, cost accounting, and staged rollout. Not a vendor ranking or a production certification. NOT for implementing a specific agent behavior (agentic-patterns), building a specific agent (ai-engineer), prompt optimization (prompt-engineer), or conventional ETL workflow design (jury_rig-architect).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end Coval accent testing workflow. Creates one persona per accent (each using a distinct accent voice and mirroring your Standard Customer behavior), launches one run per accent against the same voice agent + test set + metrics, polls for completion, builds a per-persona comparison table from the results, and creates the saved multi-run report (grouped by Persona) via the public API. Use when a user wants to follow the Testing Across Accents cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/testing-across-accents) without doing each step by hand.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Writes, fixes and red-teams prompts — system prompts, templates, meta-prompts, agent or bot instructions — as copy-paste-ready artifacts, and picks the model tier for a prompt, task or plan's subtasks. Trigger to write, improve, debug or rewrite a prompt; which model should run this; a prompt that costs too many tokens, to cut with behavior held; or say promptwright (model, optimize — tune against test cases, slim, refresh). Not for a fan-out's units (dispatchwright), installed local models (lmstudiorunner), skills or their slim (skillwright), sourced comparisons (researchscribe), handoffs (handoffwright) or a pre-build interview (grillwright).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates DDD Value Objects for PHP 8.5. Creates immutable, self-validating objects with equality comparison. Includes unit tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user requests information about academic benchmarks, datasets, or research papers, particularly in machine learning, deep learning, or logical reasoning domains. This skill enables systematic research of academic benchmarks by searching web sources, downloading and analyzing arXiv papers, extracting key metadata (number of tasks, training availability, difficulty levels), and compiling comparative summaries. It triggers on requests involving dataset comparisons, benchmark analysis, or academic paper research for table creation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Calculate statistical significance for A/B tests. Sample size estimation, power analysis, and conversion rate comparisons with confidence intervals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.