1.4천건 · 관련도순
Re-evaluate auto-review findings against the original order's intent. Filters out findings that bend the intent to reduce scope. Use after Document Workflow auto-review completes (step 5→6), or when review feedback feels like it's distorting the original goal.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use after authoring an ADR or OBPI to score its quality and optionally run the red-team challenges.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimi...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan and execute a comprehensive red team engagement covering reconnaissance through post-exploitation using MITRE ATT&CK-aligned TTPs to evaluate an organization's detection and response capabilities.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan and execute authorized vishing (voice phishing) pretext calls to assess employee susceptibility to social engineering and evaluate security awareness controls.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts authorized wireless network penetration tests to assess the security of WiFi infrastructure by testing for weak encryption protocols, captive portal bypasses, evil twin attacks, WPA2/WPA3 handshake capture, rogue access point detection, and client-side attacks. The tester evaluates wireless authentication, network segmentation, and the effectiveness of wireless intrusion detection systems. Activates for requests involving wireless pentest, WiFi security assessment, WPA2/WPA3 testing, or rogue access point detection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts penetration testing of iOS and Android mobile applications following the OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG) to identify vulnerabilities in data storage, network communication, authentication, cryptography, and platform-specific security controls. The tester performs static analysis of application binaries, dynamic analysis at runtime, and API security testing to evaluate the complete mobile attack surface. Activates for requests involving mobile app pentest, iOS security assessment, Android security testing, or OWASP MASTG assessment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use as an independent design-review pass after rendering a website; evaluates macro, meso, micro craft, applies the Design Quality rubric, identifies root causes, and prioritizes changes without defending the implementation intent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design or evaluate pricing and packaging using customer value, willingness-to-pay evidence, competitive context, unit economics and experiment design.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "audit our launch plan", "are we ready to launch", or evaluate launch execution/outcomes; runs one typed RAMP preflight, execution, or outcome profile without mixing time horizons. Not for recording launch state — use launch-registry; not for running launch day — use launch-day-conductor. 发布就绪审计/RAMP分阶段评估/发布前放行
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "test our messaging before we scale it", "design a message-market-fit panel", or "run a 5-second comprehension test on our new tagline"; produces a message-test design spec — hypothesis, panel and recruit criteria, comprehension / 5-second / message-market-fit (Wynter-style) protocols, stimulus set drawn from the canon, success thresholds, and a stop/revise decision rule — for the TALE Evaluate phase so the message is validated before any paid scale. It designs the test; it never runs the experiment or adjudicates a claim. Not for running the panel or A/B experiment — use send-experiment-designer or ad-test-designer; not for analyzing the results — use performance-analyzer; not for authoring the message itself — use message-system-architect. 消息测试/理解度测试/面板设计/五秒测试/消息市场契合
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan and evaluate event marketing across hosted events, webinars, sponsorships, speaking, trade shows, dinners, workshops, and conferences. Use for event selection, audience fit, promotion, meeting strategy, follow-up, content reuse, pipeline measurement, or event ROI. For launch-only moments use `launch`; for ongoing communities use `community-marketing`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and evaluate paid-ad experiments with hypotheses, randomization units, sample-size and duration assumptions, guardrails, platform experiment tools, analysis, and decision rules. Use for A/B test, split test, experiment design, hypothesis, statistical significance, sample size, test duration, or experiment readout.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates downstream tests for coverage and edge cases.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate and improve an existing Claude Code skill using explicit success criteria and small controlled changes. Use when the user asks to optimize a skill, reduce over-triggering or under-triggering, improve reliability, tighten instructions, or add evals for a skill. Also trigger on "スキルを改善して", "スキルを最適化して", "スキルの品質を確認して".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Identify the first beachhead market segment for a product launch. Evaluates segments against burning pain, willingness to pay, winnable market share, and referral potential. Use when choosing a first market, targeting an initial customer segment, or planning market entry strategy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill whenever the user asks to inspect, audit, review, assess, or evaluate a codebase/project for maintainability, extensibility, architecture, reliability, security, testing, engineering quality, or AI-agent/prompt/tooling risks. Also use this when invoked by `/inspect`. It performs a read-only, evidence-backed, multi-agent project inspection with complete file coverage, per-dimension scoring, blunt technical findings, and explicit degraded-mode disclosure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.