'events' 검색 결과

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-test-setup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Publish, deactivate, and delete AEM content programmatically via the Cloud Service Replication API (com.day.cq.replication). Covers single-path and bulk activation, preview-tier targeting with AgentFilter, synchronous/async options, ReplicationStatus checks, permission validation, workflow process steps, and replication event handling. Use when the user needs to publish pages, activate or deactivate content, check replication status, build workflow steps that replicate content, listen to replication events, query batch publication state, or work with Replicator, ReplicationOptions, or ReplicationStatusProvider in AEM Cloud Service.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Monitor and react to content distribution events using Sling Distribution API (org.apache.sling.distribution). Covers distribution event handling, queue monitoring, and distribution lifecycle tracking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create, implement, deploy, and debug Adobe Runtime actions with consistent layout, validation, and error handling. Use this skill whenever the user needs to add actions to an App Builder project, understand action structure (params, response format, web/raw actions), configure actions in the manifest, use App Builder SDKs (State, Files, Events, database), deploy and invoke actions via CLI, debug action issues, or implement patterns such as webhook receivers, custom event providers, journaling consumers, large payload redirects, action sequence pipelines, and Asset Compute workers. Also trigger when users mention serverless functions in Adobe context, action logging, IMS authentication for actions, or cron-style scheduled actions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AEM as a Cloud Service content distribution and replication. Covers programmatic publishing using the Replication API and distribution event monitoring using Sling Distribution events.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate and run tests for Adobe App Builder actions and UI components. Scaffolds Jest unit tests, integration tests against deployed actions, contract tests for Adobe API interactions, and React component tests using Testing Library. Provides mock helpers for State, Files, Events SDKs, @adobe/aio-lib-* clients, ExC Shell context (@adobe/exc-app), and UIX Guest SDK (@adobe/uix-guest). Use this skill whenever the user mentions testing App Builder actions, writing unit tests for Runtime actions, creating integration tests, mocking Adobe SDKs, setting up test fixtures, running aio app test, or wants to verify action behavior before deployment. Also trigger when users mention Jest configuration for App Builder, test coverage, CI test setup, React component test, Testing Library, UI test, Provider wrapper, test my page, test my form, test my table, test my component, mock shell context, mock extension context, debug test failures, or fix Jest errors.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Derive and implement first-principles audio-coupled haptic and kinetic UI feedback. Use when designing, reviewing, or coding haptics/audio for mobile apps, native iOS/Android, React Native/Expo, SwiftUI, games, detent pickers, toggles, sliders, page curls, scroll gestures, wallet/signature flows, Solana transactions, backend/realtime state changes, confirmations, settlements, and semantic UI events where feedback should follow signal math instead of ad hoc vibration calls.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Find the right skill for a capability. Load when a user or skill needs to check if a skill exists for a given task, when process-decomposer assigns skills to steps, or when agent-builder checks skill availability. Triggers on "what skill does this need", "find a skill for", "is there a skill that", "which skill handles", "does a skill exist for", "skill lookup", "check skill library". Prevents skill sprawl by always checking existing skills before creating new ones. The gatekeeper for all skill creation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runtime security for agent skills — prevents state corruption, skill overwrite attacks, denial of service, and enforces provenance tracking and no-go repo management. Load as part of the secure-* skill sequence whenever an agent processes external content or writes to the skill store. Also load when the user asks to check for state corruption, prevent skill overwrite, manage no-go repos, check provenance, audit runtime security, detect DoS patterns, or protect the skill store. Covers Issues 6, 9, 10 from the agent security threat model: instruction hierarchy enforcement, state corruption and skill overwrite, and denial of service prevention.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose Sentry issues without copy-pasting stack traces. Uses the Composio CLI to pull issue details, events, breadcrumbs, and suspect commits, then maps the frames to local source so the agent can propose a fix directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validates animation durations, enforces typography scale, checks component accessibility, and prevents layout anti-patterns in Tailwind CSS projects. Use when building UI components, reviewing CSS utilities, styling React views, or enforcing design consistency.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Azure Event Hubs SDK for Rust. Use for sending and receiving events, streaming data ingestion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automate Amplitude tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): events, user activity, cohorts, user identification. Always search tools first for current schemas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Estimates the minimum biological replicates (or cells/events) for a target power at a target FDR in genomics experiments using ssizeRNA, PROPER, powsimR for scRNA-seq, and pilot-data dispersion estimation from DESeq2/edgeR. Covers the biological-versus-technical replication distinction (technical replicates do not add degrees of freedom for biological inference), replicate-number-versus-sequencing-depth budgeting, scRNA-seq sample-versus-cell allocation under a pseudobulk model, and the critique that "n=3" is a publication convention rather than a power calculation. Use when budgeting a sequencing experiment, writing the sample-size justification in a grant, estimating replicates from pilot data, allocating a fixed budget between samples and depth, or planning scRNA-seq cohort size. For clinical-trial sample size see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the power-given-n direction see experimental-design/power-analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify recurrent and driver copy number alterations across a tumor cohort with GISTIC2 (G-score, Ziggurat deconstruction, focal vs broad/arm-level analysis, q-values from permutation) and quantify copy-number signatures with the Steele 2022 COSMIC framework and the Drews 2022 CINSignatures framework. Covers driver-gene localization from recurrence peaks, distinguishing focal drivers from arm-level passengers, and the caller-sensitivity caveats of copy-number signatures. Use when finding recurrently amplified or deleted regions in a cohort, localizing driver genes, separating focal from broad events, running GISTIC2, or extracting copy-number mutational signatures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Annotate CLIP-seq peaks or crosslink sites to RNA features (5'UTR, CDS, 3'UTR, intron, splice junction, snoRNA, tRNA, ncRNA, repeat elements) with ChIPseeker, RCAS, RBP-Maps (Yeo splicing regulatory maps), and bedtools, applying feature-priority hierarchies, transcript-context resolution, and metagene aggregation. Use when characterizing where in transcripts an RBP binds, comparing peak distribution across regions, generating splicing-regulatory maps relative to alternative-splicing events, or distinguishing exonic vs intronic vs UTR binding.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect introgression and admixture between species or populations using Dsuite (Malinsky 2021 fast D-statistics), Patterson's D / ABBA-BABA test (Green 2010; Durand 2011), f4-ratio and f-branch statistic (Malinsky 2018), TreeMix (Pickrell & Pritchard 2012), HyDe (Blischak 2018), QuIBL (Edelman 2019), sprime (Browning 2018), Twisst (Martin 2017), PhyloNet (Solis-Lemus 2017) for explicit phylogenetic networks, and qpAdm / qpGraph (Patterson 2012; Lipson 2013). Distinguish introgression from incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), ancestral structure, ghost-lineage admixture, and rate variation. Use when testing inter-species gene flow, dating admixture events, identifying introgressed segments, building phylogenetic networks for reticulate evolution, or applying the ABBAclustering (Koppetsch-Malinsky-Matschiner 2024) framework for divergent-species gene flow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect horizontal gene transfer (HGT / LGT) using compositional methods (GC%, codon usage, tetranucleotide z-scores via SIGI-HMM, AlienHunter, IslandViewer 4, IslandPath-DIMOB), phylogenetic-incongruence methods (AvP, HGTphyloDetect, ALE / GeneRax / AleRax reconciliation, RANGER-DTL), and BLAST-distribution methods (HGTector v2, DarkHorse, Alien Index). Use when screening prokaryote genomes for genomic islands and HGT events, distinguishing HGT from incomplete lineage sorting / differential gene loss / hybridization, mapping donor lineages via phylogenetic placement, separating eukaryotic HGT from contamination, ruling out gBGC as a false signal, or quantifying DTL rates with ALE/GeneRax on bacterial trees.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs time-to-event analysis for clinical trials including Cox proportional hazards regression with PH diagnostics, restricted mean survival time (RMST) under non-PH, competing risks via Fine-Gray vs cause-specific Cox, weighted log-rank and MaxCombo for non-proportional hazards, recurrent events (Andersen-Gill, PWP, WLW), and interval-censored data. Use when analyzing time-to-event endpoints (OS, PFS, DOR, TTR, TTNT) in oncology or other clinical trials.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Creates sashimi-style plots showing RNA-seq read coverage and splice junction counts using ggsashimi (general-purpose, condition-grouped overlays), rmats2sashimiplot (rMATS-output-aware), MAJIQ-VOILA (LSV posteriors interactive HTML), leafviz (leafcutter clusters Shiny), Jutils (tool-agnostic heatmaps and sashimi for rMATS/leafcutter/SUPPA2/MAJIQ output), or pyGenomeTracks (multi-track publication figures). Tool choice depends on the upstream differential-splicing tool's output format and the publication vs interactive use case. Use when visualizing specific splicing events, validating differential splicing calls, or producing publication-quality figures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and audits data retention and file compaction for an embedded SQLite datastore in a long-lived service — a unified retention registry (one declared policy per table), TTL / absolute-age / row-count-cap policies, a fail-loud coverage guard, WAL/checkpoint tuning, and auto_vacuum/incremental-vacuum so pruning actually shrinks the file. Use when a SQLite DB grows unbounded, a table has an index but no DELETE, a pruned DB never shrinks on disk, metrics are stored as raw events forever, or a new table needs bounding. Keywords retention policy, TTL, reaper, prune, VACUUM, auto_vacuum, incremental_vacuum, WAL checkpoint, freelist, DB bloat, row cap, per-tenant quota. NOT for Postgres/MySQL/server-DB partitioning or TTL, log-line rate-limiting/sampling, backup/replication, schema migrations, or query-performance indexing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.