'evaluate' 검색 결과

Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate deliverable quality — scorecard, outcome tracking, regression checklist, and aggregate stats.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Uncorrelated Evaluator — 4軸ルーブリック専門エージェント（functionality-reviewer・code-reviewer・design-reviewer・originality-reviewer）と security-reviewer を5並列実行し、成果物を多面的に独立評価します。PASS / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED 判定を返します。Self-leniency 防止のため、実装エージェントのコンテキストを引き継がない新規エージェントとして起動します。「レビューして」「評価して」「実装を確認して」などのリクエストで起動します。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Claude Codeセッションの効率を分析・スコアリングするWebツール。セッションログ（JSONL）を解析し、7観点100点満点で「無駄の有無」を評価。npx session-evaluatorで起動し、ブラウザUIでセッション選択→分析→改善提案まで実行可能。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically evaluate weak, stale, or low-conviction theses for upgrade, monitoring, or closure. Use when user says "prune", "kill list", "clean up theses", "what should I close", or "reduce portfolio".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build, test, and debug Hermes Agent RL environments for Atropos training. Covers the HermesAgentBaseEnv interface, reward functions, agent loop integration, evaluation with tools, wandb logging, and the three CLI modes (serve/process/evaluate). Use when creating, reviewing, or fixing RL environments in the hermes-agent repo.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when asked to brainstorm, evaluate whether an idea is worth building, run office hours, or think through a new product idea or design direction before any code is written.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Live developer experience audit. Uses the browse tool to actually TEST the developer experience: navigates docs, tries the getting started flow, times TTHW, screenshots error messages, evaluates CLI help text. Produces a DX scorecard with evidence. Compares against /plan-devex-review scores if they exist (the boomerang: plan said 3 minutes, reality says 8). Use when asked to "test the DX", "DX audit", "developer experience test", or "try the onboarding". Proactively suggest after shipping a developer-facing feature. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx audit", "test the developer experience", "try the onboarding", "developer experience test".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate learning progress, identify blockers, and adjust the learning plan

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate 5–10 business idea candidates from a blank page or a founder's domain context — using pain mining, jobs-to-be-done, trend × capability mapping, constraint relaxation, adjacency search, and founder-market-fit prompts. Each candidate is a structured idea card (segment, JTBD, current alternative, why-now, distribution wedge, monetisation, "feels like"). Load when the user asks to generate business ideas, brainstorm startup ideas, find ideas to work on, says "what business should I start", "give me startup ideas", "I don't know what to build", "ideate ventures", "blank-page idea generation", "find me a startup idea", "explore business opportunities". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "Uber for X" / "AI for X" with no specific JTBD, "everyone" segments, and idea cards missing any of the 7 required fields. Does NOT design or evaluate ideas generated — for that use `idea-evaluation`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Score LLM and agent outputs using LLM-as-judge techniques — direct scoring against rubrics or pairwise comparison between two outputs. Includes built-in bias mitigation for position bias, length bias, and self-enhancement bias. Load when the user asks to score an output, judge a response, evaluate against a rubric, compare two outputs, do direct scoring, run pairwise comparison, or says "rate this", "which response is better", "score this against the rubric", "judge this output", "LLM as judge this". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks about the financial differences between being an owner-operator vs company driver — gross pay, expenses, net pay, capital requirements, risk tolerance, lifestyle, and how to evaluate the path. Reference industry pay surveys.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to evaluate document retention software options. Covers compliance features, ease of use, integration, and cost.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks how to build, measure, or improve safety culture in a motor carrier — leading vs lagging safety indicators, blame-free reporting, near-miss programs, safety committee structure, monthly safety meetings, ATA Safety Management Program guidance, and how to evaluate cultural maturity. Reference ATA SMP + DOT safety culture research.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to evaluate which defensive driving program is best for your fleet. Compares Smith System, CarriersEdge, Compass-native training, and other options.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to evaluate whether to switch from annual MVR pulls to continuous monitoring. Covers cost-benefit, intervention timing, and major providers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when selecting an MRO for drug testing program oversight. Covers MRO qualifications under Part 40, what the MRO does, and how to evaluate MRO services.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.