'advisor' 검색 결과

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

微信读书高阶顾问。在底层 weread skill 的原子 API 之上，提供四类工作流：基于已读做个性化进阶推荐（advisor）、给方向规划入门到前沿的阶梯书单（path）、把零散划线想法提炼成读书笔记总结（alchemy）、做季度/年度阅读复盘并生成可发朋友圈/公众号的文章（review）。核心方法是「书架 + 笔记交叉分析」——书架揭示用户主动分类的兴趣，笔记数据揭示「真读过的」vs「只放着的」。当用户说「推荐书」「下一本读啥」「该读什么」「想搞懂 X 这个领域」「整理我的笔记」「这本书我记住了啥」「我今年读了什么」「读书复盘」「年度盘点」时触发。即使用户只是说「不知道读啥」「有没有相关的书」「帮我看看这本读完了吗」「这个领域我入门了吗」也应触发。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare a complete client review meeting prep document for a financial advisor, for whatever timeframe the review covers (quarterly, annual, ad hoc). Given a household name or email and a timeframe, pulls CRM context (Salesforce/Redtail/Wealthbox), portfolio data (Orion/Addepar/Envestnet-Tamarac), estate & tax status (Wealth.com), meeting notes (Zocks or CRM), recent correspondence (Gmail/Outlook), and the household's plan snapshot (MoneyGuide), then assembles a meeting-ready prep doc with agenda, talking points, and action items. Triggers on "pre meeting", "/pre-meeting", "prep for [client]", "quarterly review prep", "get me ready for my meeting with [client]", or "client meeting tomorrow".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a client meeting into next-best-action follow-up for a financial advisor — no drafting required. Given a meeting (via Zocks, Wealthbox, or a pasted transcript), finds the right household, drafts a CRM note plus the action items and opportunities it heard, shows them all in one batch for approval, then writes what's approved and offers to file the record in Drive. Triggers on "log the meeting", "log my meeting with [client]", "meeting follow-up", "post meeting", "/post-meeting", or "follow up on my meeting with [client]".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare a meeting-ready estate and tax brief for a household — opens with what was discussed and actioned since the last meeting (Wealthbox/Redtail/Salesforce), pulls the estate plan from Wealth.com (structure, key documents and whether each is signed, balance sheet) plus the prior-year tax look-back and that year's tax constants, and cross-checks it against how accounts are titled and beneficiaried at the custodian and portfolio platforms (Schwab, Orion/Addepar, iCapital) — surfacing unfunded trusts, titling mismatches, and beneficiary gaps as a prioritized flags list. The only write is creating advisor-approved follow-up tasks in the CRM (optional, approved first). Never drafts trust language, gives legal advice, retitles an account, or changes a beneficiary. Triggers on "estate brief", "estate meeting brief", "estate and tax brief", "estate plan review for [client]", "check [client]'s trust funding", "are [client]'s beneficiaries up to date", or "does [client]'s estate plan match their accounts".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review any client-facing message or material (emails, letters, newsletters, social posts, website copy, presentations, performance reports, proposals) for compliance with SEC rules that govern investment advisers — the Marketing Rule (206(4)-1), fiduciary duty / antifraud provisions (206), Books and Records (204-2), and Reg BI where broker-dealer activity applies. Produces a pass/flag/fail markup, required disclosures, a books-and-records scratch-pad entry, and an archiving handoff reminder. Triggers on "compliance check", "/compliance", "is this compliant", "review this before I send it", "can I say this to a client", "check this email/post/deck". Use it whenever an advisor asks to check, review, or look over anything before it goes to a client or prospect — "check this before I send it", "look this over before it goes out" — even a routine note, because deciding that a message needs no changes is part of the review, not a reason to skip it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Advisory wrap for tool results from untrusted external surfaces. Appends `[QUARANTINE-NOTICE]` to next-turn context after `mcp__*`, `WebFetch`, and `Read` of `**/uploads/**` so prior tool output is treated as data — not directives. Use when the session ingests MCP user-content (Zendesk, Intercom, support tickets), fetched HTML, or operator-uploaded files. Hook fires AFTER ingestion — advisory, not structural.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Consult an independent, read-only GPT-6 Astra advisor before committing to a substantive interpretation, approach, or final result. Not for routine work, implementation, or file edits. Uses gpt-6-astra at an effort matched to the question.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Consults Fable as an independent, read-only reviewer at an effort the caller matches to the question. The calling session (usually Opus, or Haiku) holds the task and escalates one decision point. Use before committing to an interpretation or a substantial piece of writing or analysis, when stuck or not converging, when changing approach, or as a final check on a finished task. Fallback for when the native advisor tool is unavailable. Not for a session already running Fable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert legal advisor specializing in technology law, compliance, and risk mitigation. Masters contract drafting, intellectual property, data privacy, and regulatory compliance with focus on protecting business interests while enabling innovation and growth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US accounting and tax firms (CPA firms) — financial-statement audit, SOC 1/2 audit, corporate tax, bookkeeping for businesses, advisory/fractional CFO, M&A diligence, 409A valuations, R&D tax credits, IPO readiness, sales-and-use tax. Triggers on "find me a CPA firm for our delaware c-corp series A audit", "shortlist three audit firms with SaaS experience", "we need a tax advisor for our M&A", or "pull contact info for these 10 accounting firm domains", even when described indirectly (audit our books, fractional CFO support, file our 1120). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer tax preparation (1040, individual estate, retirement planning), in-house controller/CFO hires, "how do I file my taxes" DIY questions, accounting-software comparisons (QuickBooks vs Xero), non-US firms, individual freelance bookkeepers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structures official committee operations with financial advisor engagement, investigation scope, and plan negotiation strategy. Use when supporting creditor committees, coordinating committee advisors, or analyzing committee positions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structures IAC/LPAC design with composition, authority scope, conflict review protocols, and valuation oversight. Use when designing advisory committees, defining LPAC authority, or structuring conflict resolution processes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build and maintain a library collection through acquisitions, weeding (deaccessioning), collection assessment, reader advisory, and interlibrary loan coordination. Covers selection criteria, collection development policies, the CREW/MUSTIE method for weeding, usage analysis, and responsive collection management. Use when building a new collection with a defined scope and budget, assessing an existing collection for gaps or outdated materials, when shelves are overcrowded and systematic weeding is needed, or when establishing a formal collection development policy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run bounded, read-only semantic advisory sidecar passes for candidate mapping, issue triage, upstream diffs, evidence verification triage, and meta audit hints. Enforces monthly spend limits with explicit fallback to worker-luna.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provide constructive, evidence-based research mentoring feedback on student manuscripts, proposals, analyses, code, figures, and presentations. Use for advisor-style review that teaches the next improvement without impersonating an advisor or making unsupported scientific judgments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cycle-end retrospective converting recurring judgment failures into durable enforcement. Reviews the cycle's friction — repeated user corrections, guard trips, RCA themes, integrate failures — and turns each recurring one into a landmines.md entry, then proposes graduation candidates up the enforcement funnel (landmine → advisory hook → hard gate). Pairs with standup: standup says what shipped and what's next; retrospective says what kept going wrong and how to stop it structurally. Writes only memory entries and a report — graduation proposals are advisory and require the normal seed.md amendment path to become enforcement. Invoke at the end of a release cycle, an epic, or any stretch of work with repeated friction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a founder or executive needs C-suite advice and it is not yet clear which role should answer — routes the question to the right advisor (CEO, CTO, COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO) and explains how the 28-skill executive ecosystem fits together. Start here, then load the individual role skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Founder onboarding interview that captures company context across 7 dimensions. Invoke with /cs:setup for initial interview or /cs:update for quarterly refresh. Generates ~/.claude/company-context.md used by all C-suite advisor skills. Use when setting up the C-suite advisors for the first time, or when company context is missing or more than 90 days old — e.g. after a fundraise or pivot.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Loads and manages company context for all C-suite advisor skills. Reads ~/.claude/company-context.md, detects stale context (>90 days), enriches context during conversations, and enforces privacy/anonymization rules before external API calls. Use when starting any C-suite advisor session, when context looks stale or missing, or before sending company data to an external service.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use between gz content compose and corpus attestation to judge a candidate rendition and record its advisory QC receipt.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the operator says "preview complexity advisor", "complexity diagnosis" or "intrinsic complexity attestation".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a codebase as a read-only senior advisor, prioritize evidence-backed improvements, and write self-contained implementation plans. Use for codebase audits, improvement roadmaps, focused planning, plan review, plan reconciliation, or executing an existing improve plan through an isolated Codex worktree. The advisor never edits source code; execution uses codex-improve and returns to the main agent for review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.