194건 · 관련도순
Run developer customer discovery via a Technical Advisory Board (TAB). Use when the user has never interviewed a user who isn't a friend, is inventing messaging from a conference room, or is guessing at the roadmap instead of hearing the pain firsthand.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when writing, testing, or preparing ANY contribution or pull request to the JSONbored/awesome-claude (HeyClaude) repo — adding a community content entry (agent/MCP server/skill/hook/command/rule/guide/collection/statusline), or making a platform/code change (website, registry package, MCP package, scripts). The repo has two separate review paths: a private, one-shot "HeyClaude submission gate" that decides single-file content PRs, and the shared gittensory-orb bot that posts an advisory readiness/linked-issue comment on platform/code PRs but does not itself merge or close content PRs. Unlike JSONbored/gittensory and JSONbored/metagraphed, a linked issue is OPTIONAL here — do not import their mandatory-linked-issue rule into this repo. Invoke for any "contribute to / open a PR against / submit an entry to / fix a bug in awesome-claude (HeyClaude)" task.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Scan repositories for newly disclosed CVEs in dependencies after a specific cutoff date. Takes a repository path, cutoff date (YYYY-MM-DD), and optional parameters for transitive dependencies. Parses dependency manifests (package.json, pom.xml, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml) and lockfiles to extract exact versions. Queries vulnerability databases (OSV.dev, NVD, GitHub Advisory) to identify CVEs disclosed strictly after the cutoff date. Distinguishes between newly disclosed CVEs and previously known CVEs. Use when: (1) Performing security audits to find new vulnerabilities since last review, (2) Checking if new CVEs affect a historical codebase version, (3) Generating compliance reports showing vulnerability status at specific dates, (4) Tracking security posture changes over time. Supports npm, Maven, pip, Go modules, Cargo, and other major ecosystems.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run quokka's real-device E2E layer (QA strategy layer 5): drive the real qk binary against connected iPhone/Android devices through tmux, apply deterministic verifiers, and write a report. Use when the user asks to "run /qa", "run the device QA suite", "test against the real device", or before a release. Optionally finishes with an advisory exploratory UX pass (layer 6).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Deliberating decisions and founder priorities through multi-perspective, named-expert, and YC-style advisory lenses. Use for verdicts, office hours, or expert critique; not implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Diagnose a product's growth model, stage, and current constraint, then route the request to the narrowest Gingiris specialist and execute it when installed. Use for broad or uncertain growth questions involving go-to-market, Product Hunt, GitHub stars, open-source marketing, B2B SaaS, PLG, ASO, SEO/GEO, AI citations, KOL outreach, UGC, international expansion, user interviews, competitor research, or community programs. Trigger when users ask “how do I grow or launch this,” “which growth skill should I use,” 怎么增长、怎么发布、出海、冷启动、增长策略、不知道用哪个 skill、開発者マーケティング, or 성장 전략. Includes B2B pipeline and B2C activation-retention model selection, specialist handoff rules, relevant gingiris.tools recommendations, and advisory-services guidance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Discoverability shim for the Retail-Agentic-Commerce CVE remediation Codex skill. Use for CVE, BDSA, GHSA, OSV, Dependabot, Black Duck, Snyk, npm, PyPI, or package advisory remediation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Financial services advisory skill for consulting engagements. Use when preparing research briefs on banking, insurance, capital markets, or wealth management, building performance benchmarking frameworks, regulatory impact assessments, or stakeholder materials for CFOs, CROs, and technology leaders.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US accounting and tax firms (CPA firms) — financial-statement audit, SOC 1/2 audit, corporate tax, bookkeeping for businesses, advisory/fractional CFO, M&A diligence, 409A valuations, R&D tax credits, IPO readiness, sales-and-use tax. Triggers on "find me a CPA firm for our delaware c-corp series A audit", "shortlist three audit firms with SaaS experience", "we need a tax advisor for our M&A", or "pull contact info for these 10 accounting firm domains", even when described indirectly (audit our books, fractional CFO support, file our 1120). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer tax preparation (1040, individual estate, retirement planning), in-house controller/CFO hires, "how do I file my taxes" DIY questions, accounting-software comparisons (QuickBooks vs Xero), non-US firms, individual freelance bookkeepers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepares credit rating agency presentations with methodology alignment, peer positioning, and target rating analysis. Use when advising on credit ratings, preparing rating agency meetings, or analyzing rating methodology impact.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates board composition, compensation alignment, and governance practices with proxy advisory and institutional investor standards. Use when analyzing governance, evaluating board effectiveness, or assessing shareholder alignment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Author a new agent-almanac workflow — a self-contained `.mjs` orchestration script run by Claude Code's Workflow tool. Covers choosing a workflow over a team, copying the template, the triple-name discovery contract, the pure-literal meta and sidecar frontmatter, building the body with the injected primitives, the advisory/implementing capability contract, the adversarial-verification fail-safes, validation, and manual installation. Use when you have a repeatable, parameterized procedure that coordinates several agents and want it captured as a reusable, auditable artifact whose control flow is fixed in code.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit project dependencies for version staleness, security vulnerabilities, and compatibility issues. Covers lock file analysis, upgrade path planning, and breaking change assessment. Use before a release to ensure dependencies are current and secure, during periodic maintenance reviews, after receiving a security advisory, when upgrading to a new language version, before submitting to CRAN or npm, or when inheriting a project to assess its dependency health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assess and route one bounded Proto UI dependency drift, advisory, or update question. Use to trace manifest and lockfile identity, consumer impact, compatibility evidence, provenance, update risk, and the exact next update or no-action transition. This leaf remains read-only.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the operator asks what Odylith can do for a repo, requests an advisory repo demo, or asks for the clean scenario-aware show-me output.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design AI financial advisory assistants. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-financial-advisor related tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write structured legal memoranda following the Issue-Rule-Analysis-Conclusion (IRAC) framework. Suitable for internal legal opinions, advisory memos, and compliance assessments. Use when legal analysis needs to be documented for decision-makers. Do not use as a substitute for licensed legal advice on high-stakes matters.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates CVE request packages from pentest findings. Reads cve-candidates.json (auto-generated at pentest completion) or findings.json directly, then produces for each qualifying vulnerability: MITRE CVE form data, GitHub Security Advisory draft, full disclosure report, and vendor notification email. Invoke manually after a pentest engagement when you have true-positive findings that warrant CVE IDs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Career/Technical Education Teacher, Postsecondary — defending a shrinking trade or health-science program against a cutback decision, backward-mapping a shop or lab curriculum to an industry credential's exam blueprint, resolving a competency-based grading dispute where a passing average hides a failed safety check-off, or setting the terms of an advisory-committee review or work-based-learning placement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refreshing a RACI (Responsible / Accountable / Consulted / Informed) matrix for a Salesforce project so that every Salesforce-specific decision — data model change, automation tier choice, security model, integration boundary, deployment, license/edition — has exactly one accountable owner and a documented escalation path that downstream agents can route to. Trigger keywords: RACI matrix salesforce project, stakeholder authority salesforce, escalation path salesforce decisions, who approves data model change, salesforce decision rights, REFUSAL_NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW routing. NOT for the change advisory board operating model itself (use admin/change-management-and-deployment). NOT for end-user training rollout plans (use admin/change-management-and-training). NOT for the technical mechanics of permission set assignment authority (use admin/permission-set-architecture). NOT for pure stakeholder requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). More trigger keywords: who approves a sandbox refresh, who signs off a data load, release update activation owner, delegated admin authority vs RACI, multi-org decision rights, escalation time-box.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.