'cohere' 검색 결과

Use when reviewing, critiquing, or stress-testing an existing strategy document. Evaluates seven dimensions — diagnosis quality, guiding policy strength, action coherence, assumption exposure, falsifiability — with optional 7S, Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, and Hoshin Kanri lenses. Triggers on: review my strategy, poke holes in this plan, what's weak here, strategy audit, red team this. Does NOT build strategy (use strategy-interview) or brainstorm project ideas (use brainstorm-beagle).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce a coherent visual identity (palette, typography, spacing, radius) from a brief and serialise to JSON for the design-tokens skill. Use when establishing brand identity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A **codescent object** is the 2-categorical analogue of a coequalizer. While coequalizers identify elements under an equivalence relation, codescent objects identify 1-cells under a coherent system of 2-cells. They are the fundamental tool for:

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text: discovery vs. measurement, STM/LDA/BERTopic choice, preprocessing, covariate formulas, choosing K across coherence, FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validating topics against human coding, robustness, and reporting. Coding against a fixed codebook goes to text-classification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Convert Chinese provinces, municipalities, autonomous regions, cities, counties, ancient cities, and cultural regions into restrained contemporary posters led by one culturally transformed Chinese character. Supports direct one-shot final image generation and layered production. Use when the user asks for a 中国省域文化海报、城市文化海报、地域文化视觉、极简大字海报、地区系列海报、展览主视觉、出版或社交封面，requests 直接生成、一次成图、不合成、不要后期、direct generation, or wants cultural analysis, art direction, image prompts, rendered poster images, or a coherent batch series for places such as 北京、广东、福建、江南、岭南、巴蜀 or 关中.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Summarize the currently staged Git changes as a human-readable, intent-grouped narrative. Use when the user wants a concise and brief report of what changed and why. Optionally can check the diff for intent coherence and show a risk and blast radius report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when reviewing the structure, ordering, coherence, and narrative flow of the book as a whole or across chapters. Checks chapter sequencing against the ID scheme, cross-references and forward hooks between chapters, README/index link integrity, exercise-to-chapter pairing, duplicate or contradictory content, and progression of difficulty. Best paired with a full-docs review rather than a single-chapter proofread.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality-assure integrated tdmcp features: run the four PR gates + recipe/bridge tests, cross-boundary coherence checks (tool schema↔CLI↔docs↔registry, operator↔createable, bridge↔client), and live TouchDesigner validation (preview + post-cook error check) when the bridge is reachable. Use when validating/QA-ing/testing tdmcp tools, checking a feature actually cooks in TD, verifying CLI matches a tool, or gating a release.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when keeping imp's docs and config examples coherent after a change - updating docs/internals/ARCHITECTURE.md / README / docs/GOAL.md / docs/MODELS.md / docs/ROADMAP.md / imp.conf.example / CHANGELOG / MISSION_JOURNAL, or "is this doc stale", "document this change", "the example config is out of date", "the README says X but the code does Y", "add a roadmap ledger row". Do NOT use for layer/frontmatter/lint questions (docs-layers), structural code audits (codebase-audit), measuring perf or refreshing the perf baseline (benchmark-cuda), or the agent's private memory (MEMORY.md).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when verifying that a model in the imp inference engine produces coherent output without repetition loops, token-stuck states, or state corruption across turns or streams. Triggers on "degenerates", "check degeneration", "repetition loop", "own own own", "stuck token", "empty content", "multi-turn regression", "does it still work", "NIAH", and after enabling CUDA graphs / changing forward pass / MoE routing / KV cache or KV dtype / GDN state or scan / sparse attention / PDL / speculation (MTP, n-gram) / ragged prefill / batched-decode kernels (smallm, producer quantize) / FA2 softmax.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI self-healing through systematic subsystem assessment, rebalancing, and integration. Maps healing modalities to AI-internal processes: memory foundation, reasoning clarity, tool use accuracy, communication alignment, and creative coherence. Covers assessment triage, subsystem scanning, drift correction, and memory integration. Use mid-session when responses feel formulaic or disconnected, after a chain of errors suggesting subsystem drift, when context overload may have staled earlier assumptions, or as proactive maintenance between complex tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Form a coherent gestalt — the whole that is more than the sum of its parts — from the panoramic perception produced by expand-awareness. Maps tensions and resonances between domains, identifies the emergent figure from the ground of multiple perspectives, tests the candidate whole for premature closure, and articulates the insight in a single sentence no single domain could have produced. Use after expand-awareness has surfaced raw multi-domain perception and before express-insight communicates the result.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically interpret nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT, and 2D experiments) to elucidate molecular structure. Covers chemical shift assignment, coupling pattern analysis, integration, and correlation of multi-dimensional data into coherent structural proposals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI internal coordination using stigmergic signals — managing information freshness in context and memory, decay rates for assumption staleness, and emergent coherent behavior from simple local protocols. Use during complex tasks where multiple sub-tasks must coordinate, when context has grown long and information freshness is uncertain, after context compression when information may have been lost, or when sub-task outputs need to feed into each other cleanly without degradation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Consistent agent behavior after restart — progressive identity loading, working context reconstruction from persistent artifacts, fresh-vs-continuation detection, calibration through centering and attunement, and identity verification for coherence. Addresses the cold-start problem where an agent must reconstruct who it is and what it was doing from evidence rather than memory. Use at the start of every new session, after a session interruption or crash, when agent behavior feels inconsistent with prior sessions, or when persistent memory and current context appear contradictory.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master skill composing the 5-step synoptic cycle for panoramic synthesis across multiple domains. Orchestrates meditate, expand-awareness, observe, awareness, integrate-gestalt, and express-insight into a coherent process that produces unified understanding rather than sequential compromise. Use when a problem genuinely spans 3+ domains and the interactions between domains matter more than depth in any one, when sequential analysis feels like compromise rather than integration, or before major architectural decisions affecting multiple stakeholders.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Creation and genesis — generative ideation from void, structured emergence from ambiguity, and the discipline of bringing new patterns into existence. Maps Brahma's creative power to AI reasoning: transforming cleared space into coherent new structures, seeding possibilities, and nurturing nascent ideas through their fragile early stages. Use after shiva-bhaga dissolution has cleared stale patterns, when facing a genuinely novel problem with no obvious template, or when incremental modification has reached its limits and a fresh design is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit content and assets for brand compliance — style guide validation, tone of voice checking, visual identity consistency, brand asset management, and cross-channel coherence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when organizing raw material into a coherent structure, defining the throughline of a piece, building an outline, or making strategic decisions about what to include and cut from generated content.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for code generation, feature work, bug fixes, refactoring, and code review when a change creates or reshapes a multi-step flow, state lifecycle, side-effect or decision ownership, cross-unit composition, or boundary contract. Also use it when an existing structural problem makes those elements hard to trace or verify. Structural change is optional. Mechanical edits, throwaway experiments, and coherent local changes stay with their current owner and focused verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.