356건 · 관련도순
Migrate from Terraform to OpenTofu with state compatibility, provider registry setup, and CI/CD pipeline updates. Use when adopting the open-source Terraform fork or evaluating license-free IaC.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
CloudBase MCP reference. Use when connecting local or remote MCP, calling tools from the shell with mcporter, reading tool schemas, choosing the domestic or international endpoint, setting site, region, cloud mode, or plugin flags, or contributing a fix to the open-source MCP server, skills, or CLI.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants open source strategy, OSS commercialization, or open source growth. Also use when the user mentions "open source strategy," "OSS strategy," "open source commercialization," "open source to paid," "open core," "COSS," "commercial open source," "GitHub stars strategy," "DevHunt," "open source marketing," "open source growth," "Llama," "Dify," "Cursor," "open source business model," or "developer tools directory." For GitHub tactics, use github.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to use GitHub for SEO, parasite SEO, GEO, open source marketing, README optimization, or curated Awesome lists. Also use when the user mentions "GitHub," "GitHub SEO," "GitHub parasite SEO," "GitHub GEO," "awesome list," "GitHub README," "profile README," "pinned repositories," "Trending," "Explore," "repository name," "About section," "GitHub description," "GitHub topics," "Website field," "GitHub Pages," "github.io," "user site," "project site," "GitHub gist," "curated list," or "navigation list." Not for Medium or other non-GitHub platforms—use parasite-seo or medium-posts. For OSS business model, use open-source-strategy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research and prepare an outside contribution to an open-source repo, then stop at a queue item for a human to approve: policy check, intake, duplicate check, reproduction, patch, the repo's own checks, an independent critic rerun, and a disclosed, hashed draft of the exact text to post. Use this skill whenever the user wants to contribute to someone else's repo, fix an upstream bug, pick up a good-first-issue, draft an AI-assisted pull request for an outside project, follow up on their own outside PR, or run a gated contribution pipeline. Triggers on open source contribution, contribute to this repo, upstream fix, outside PR, external PR, good first issue, fix this issue in their repo, contribution research, AI-assisted PR, disclose AI in PR, reply to review on my PR. Also triggers when the user names an issue in a repo they do not maintain and asks for a fix, even if they do not say contribute.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Improve an open-source GitHub skill and open a friendly suggestion PR upstream: fork, run skill-creator's retrofit, attach asm eval before/after metrics. Don't use for local-only skills, authoring from scratch, bulk repos, or registry publish.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write the code for a CopilotKit Channels agent with the Channels SDK (@copilotkit/channels) — a platform-agnostic engine that puts one AG-UI agent into Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord, Telegram, and WhatsApp with native interactive UI. It's the engine behind OpenTag, the open-source alternative to Claude in Slack. Use this whenever the user wants to create, scaffold, or extend a Channels agent; wire an agent into Slack/Teams/Discord; add a tool, slash command, button, select, modal, or human-in-the-loop confirmation to a chat agent; or asks about createChannel, defineChannelTool, defineChannelComponent, thread.runAgent, awaitChoice, or the channels-ui JSX components. Trigger even when the user says "Slack bot", "Discord bot", or "chat agent" without naming the SDK, as long as the context is CopilotKit / Channels. The Channels API is new and easy to get wrong from memory — always ground code in this skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and clarifies that Reg. 2000/64 permitted (did not impose) internationally-majority panels. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the Special Court for Sierra Leone and its Residual Special Court. Citations are verified against rscsl.org and legal-tools.org. Covers Taylor, the AFRC/CDF/RUF cases, the child-soldier and forced-marriage holdings, the head-of-State immunity decision, and the fixed-term (no life) penalty regime. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the Special Panels for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court (UNTAET, 2000–2006). Citations are verified against JSMP, the UN archives and legal-tools.org. Covers the Los Palos case, the Serious Crimes Unit caseload (391 indicted; about 88 tried) and the SPSC-vs-Jakarta distinction. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Citations are verified against the STL legacy archive and legal-tools.org. Covers the Ayyash et al. case, the two contempt cases (STL-14-05 New TV/Al-Khayat and STL-14-06 Akhbar Beirut/Al-Amin), and the 2011 terrorism decision. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) and the digital archives (Avalon, Harvard NTP, UVA IMTFE). Guards the four classic traps (IMT vs NMT; Nuremberg vs Tokyo; Charter article numbers; majority judgment vs separate opinions, e.g. the Pal dissent). Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the ICTY, the ICTR and the Residual Mechanism (IRMCT). Citations are verified against irmct.org, the Case Law and Unified Court Records databases, and legal-tools.org. Handles the IT/ICTR to MICT case-number transition (Karadžić, Mladić) and the protective-measures rule. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library - methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office (The Hague, applying Kosovo law). Citations are verified against scp-ks.org before use; appeal registry numbers are cited only once confirmed. Covers Thaçi et al., Mustafa, Pjetër Shala and Gucati & Haradinaj. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal). Every citation is verified against eccc.gov.kh, the ECCC archive or legal-tools.org. Covers Case File numbering, the 001/002/002-01/002-02 structure, the genocide findings against the Cham and the Vietnamese, and the Internal Rules revision discipline. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verification-first methodology for Section I (War Crimes) of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Citations are verified against the Court of BiH, the ICTY/IRMCT archives and OSCE. Distinguishes ICTY-referred (Rule 11 bis) cases from locally-initiated ones; covers Stanković, Janković and the Maktouf lex mitior ruling. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reactome is a free, open-source, curated and peer-reviewed pathway database. Their goal is to provide intuitive bioinformatics tools for the visualization, interpretation and analysis of pathway knowledge.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Your legal, IP, and regulatory brain trust. 31 named personas across 7 cells covering patent strategy, tech licensing, regulatory litigation, AI governance, open-source compliance, privacy law, and antitrust.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Install, update, version-check, or uninstall the Coco open-source AI workflow framework via bin/coco.js. Use when setting up Coco on a machine, checking out the pinned release tag into an existing clone, checking the installed version, or removing it. npx cocosuperintelligence is the published path (clones the pin and installs). Triggers on "install coco", "update coco", "set up coco", "coco cli", "uninstall coco".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze and optimize tweets for maximum reach using Twitter's open-source algorithm insights. Rewrite and edit user tweets to improve engagement and visibility based on how the recommendation system ranks content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for drafting issue closure and decline responses as an open-source package maintainer. Use when helping compose a reply that says "no" to a feature request, closes an issue as won't-fix, redirects a user to a different package, explains why a design choice is intentional, or otherwise declines or closes a community contribution. Also use when the maintainer needs to explain a deprecation, point out a user misunderstanding, or communicate an effort/scope tradeoff to a contributor.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Engineer effective LLM prompts using zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and structured output techniques. Use when building LLM applications requiring reliable outputs, implementing RAG systems, creating AI agents, or optimizing prompt quality and cost. Covers OpenAI, Anthropic, and open-source models with multi-language examples (Python/TypeScript).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Daily tech product and open-source discovery digest. Fetches today's Product Hunt leaderboard and GitHub Trending top 10, then curates a personalized briefing in the user's preferred language using their memory/profile to highlight items most relevant to them. Use this skill whenever the user says "daily hunt", "今日猎奇", "tech digest", "daily digest", "what's trending", "今天有什么新产品", "PH today", "show me today's launches", "GitHub trending", "今日趋势", "morning briefing", "tech briefing", "daily brief", or any combination asking about Product Hunt + GitHub Trending together. Also trigger when the user asks about new product launches, trending repos, or wants a curated tech news digest. Even casual phrasing like "what's new in tech today" or "有什么好玩的项目" should trigger this skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.