'phases' 검색 결과

Intelligent Core Web Vitals analysis with automated workflows and decision trees. Measures LCP, CLS, INP with guided debugging that automatically determines follow-up analysis based on results. Includes workflows for LCP deep dive (5 phases), CLS investigation (loading vs interaction), INP debugging (latency breakdown + attribution), and cross-skill integration with loading, interaction, and media skills. Use when the user asks about Core Web Vitals, LCP optimization, layout shifts, or interaction responsiveness. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Intelligent interaction performance analysis with automated workflows for INP debugging, scroll jank investigation, and main thread blocking. Includes decision trees that automatically run script attribution when long frames detected, break down input latency phases, and correlate layout shifts with interactions. Features workflows for complete interaction audit, third-party script impact analysis, and animation performance debugging. Cross-skill integration with Core Web Vitals (INP/CLS correlation) and Loading (script execution analysis). Use when the user asks about slow interactions, janky scrolling, unresponsive pages, or INP optimization. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Save provenance, decisions, phases, context policy, and next steps as kernel.handoff/v1. Triggers: handoff, save, pause, context, continue later.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect GraphQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (confirm GraphQL usage and find unsafe operation document assembly sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, up to 3 candidate sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/graphql-results.md. If no GraphQL technology is found in Phase 1, later phases are skipped. Use when asked to find GraphQL injection, unsafe GraphQL document construction, or operation string injection bugs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze Swift and mixed-language compile hotspots using build timing summaries and Swift frontend diagnostics, then produce a recommend-first source-level optimization plan. Use when a developer reports slow compilation, type-checking warnings, expensive clean-build compile phases, long CompileSwiftSources tasks, warn-long-function-bodies output, or wants to speed up Swift type checking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit Xcode project configuration, build settings, scheme behavior, and script phases to find build-time improvements with explicit approval gates. Use when a developer wants project-level build analysis, slow incremental builds, guidance on target dependencies, build settings review, run script phase analysis, parallelization improvements, or module-map and DEFINES_MODULE configuration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects A/B chromatin compartments from balanced Hi-C contact matrices via eigenvector decomposition of the distance-normalized, Pearson-correlated cis matrix with cooltools (eigs_cis), then orients (phases) the compartment eigenvector against a GC or gene-density track so the active (A) sign is not arbitrary. Covers the eigenvector-is-a-choice problem (per-arm view_df to remove the centromere gradient; picking the eigenvector by max correlation with activity, not by eigenvalue), GC phasing with bioframe.frac_gc, resolution choice (100kb-1Mb), saddle plots and saddle_strength for compartmentalization strength, the cohesin-loss-strengthens-compartments result, subcompartments (SNIPER/Calder/dcHiC), and cross-condition compartment switching. Use when calling A/B compartments, computing E1/eigenvectors, phasing the eigenvector, building saddle plots, choosing a compartment resolution, quantifying compartment strength, or comparing compartmentalization across conditions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Phases small variants, SVs, and methylation from Oxford Nanopore and PacBio long reads (read-backed/physical phasing) with WhatsHap, LongPhase, or HiPhase, and haplotags the BAM (HP/PS tags) for allele-resolved downstream analysis. Covers why phase blocks break at het-sparse gaps (read length x heterozygosity), why phasing the VCF is useless until the BAM is haplotagged, the GT-pipe/PS and read HP/PS tag spec, reporting block N50 with switch error, the diploid-assumption/CNV/haploid-region traps, trio phasing as the gold standard, and the boundary to statistical panel phasing. Use when phasing long-read variants, haplotagging reads for allele-specific methylation/expression or phased SVs, choosing WhatsHap vs LongPhase vs HiPhase, trio phasing, or assessing phasing quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Configures and enforces SwiftLint in Swift projects using build tool plugins, run scripts, and CI. Covers .swiftlint.yml configuration, disabled_rules, opt_in_rules, only_rules, analyzer_rules, baselines, autocorrect, swiftlint:disable suppressions, reporter formats (sarif, json, checkstyle), strict and lenient modes, SwiftLintBuildToolPlugin via SimplyDanny/SwiftLintPlugins, swift package plugin swiftlint, Xcode run script phases, CI integration, multiple configuration files, and rollout strategies for existing codebases. Use when setting up SwiftLint, configuring lint rules, suppressing warnings, creating baselines, choosing between build tool plugin and run script, or integrating SwiftLint into CI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn raw MATLAB code into a published .mltbx toolbox — full pipeline from scope definition through packaging and release. Drives 8 phases with human checkpoints, enforcing ordering and dependencies. Use when asked to package, create a toolbox, or run the files-to-package pipeline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Programmatically author RoadRunner scenarios from MATLAB using roadrunnerAPI. Use when adding actors, creating routes, building scenario logic (phases, conditions, actions), placing vehicles/pedestrians, defining cut-in/crossing/ follow scenarios, or any programmatic scenario creation in RoadRunner. Triggers on: roadrunnerAPI, scenario authoring, add actor, create route, phase logic, cut-in scenario, pedestrian crossing, scenario from MATLAB.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a phased delivery orchestration plan for creative-direction-driven work: which skills run when, what locks at which gate, how handoffs occur, and how the cadence implements in the team's tools (Jira, Linear, Notion, Figma, GitHub) with AI agents via MCP and CLI. A temporal map of phases, lock points, handoff specs, gate definitions, and QA verification gates. Distinct from `creative-brief` (static project brief) and `creative-direction` (aesthetic direction). Triggers on integration orchestrator, delivery cadence, project orchestration, when does the brief lock, how to phase creative direction, design-development handoff, QA gate, agent-driven QA, and when a creative-direction project is starting, mid-flight with broken cadence, or integrating AI agents into PM workflow. Does NOT fire for project scoping (use `creative-brief`), aesthetic direction (use `creative-direction`), or general project management without a creative-direction throughline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic root-cause debugging. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause investigation first. Four phases: Root Cause Investigation, Pattern Analysis (6 known patterns), Hypothesis Testing (3-strike rule), Implementation. Structured debug report output.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Infrastructure-first security audit across 14 phases: attack surface mapping, secrets archaeology (git history), supply chain analysis, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI threat detection, OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling. Confidence gates, exploit scenarios, parallel verification, trend tracking. Read-only.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a 12-month SEO plan that scores four pillars and phases the roadmap. "build an SEO strategy"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals to preserve context through task phases rather than arbitrary auto-compaction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks what UAT or verification items are still outstanding across phases, or wants a prioritized manual test plan. Scans every phase for pending, skipped, blocked and human_needed items and flags stale docs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a planned but unstarted phase should come off the roadmap. Removes the phase, renumbers the phases after it into a clean sequence, and commits the change as the historical record.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to think through an idea before committing to a plan, e.g. /gsd-explore auth strategy. Runs a Socratic session, optionally spawns research, then routes output to notes, seeds, requirements, or new phases.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user says run the rest autonomously, overnight, or hands-off through the remaining phases. Runs discuss, plan, execute per phase, pausing only for user decisions, then milestone audit, complete, and cleanup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use before /gsd-manager to fill in missing Depends on fields in ROADMAP.md. Analyzes file overlap, semantic dependencies and data flow between phases, then suggests dependency updates to confirm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.