'refinement' 검색 결과

Orchestrate the full PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018) five-agent pipeline to turn unstructured research materials (idea, experimental log, LaTeX template, conference guidelines, optional figures) into a submission-ready LaTeX manuscript and compiled PDF. TRIGGER when the user asks to "write a paper from my experiments", "turn this idea and these results into a paper", "generate a conference submission", "run paper-orchestra on X", or otherwise wants the end-to-end paper-writing pipeline. Coordinates the outline-agent, plotting-agent, literature-review-agent, section-writing-agent, and content-refinement-agent skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cultivate defensive situational awareness, threat assessment, and mental clarity under pressure. Covers the Cooper color code awareness system, body language reading and intent detection, verbal de-escalation, moving mindfulness in public spaces, combat focus and the OODA loop, rapid grounding techniques for acute stress, context-specific integration, and ongoing review and refinement of awareness skills. Use when entering unfamiliar or potentially hostile environments, needing to assess a situation for safety, de-escalating a verbal confrontation, or integrating awareness practice into daily movement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps, a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or related skills are added and cross-references are stale.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Improve an existing R-based pictogram glyph for the visualization layer. Covers visual audit of the current glyph, diagnosis of specific issues (proportions, readability, glow balance), targeted modifications to the glyph function, re-rendering, and before/after comparison. Works for skill, agent, and team glyphs. Use when a glyph renders poorly at small sizes, its visual metaphor is unclear, it has proportion issues, the neon glow effect is unbalanced, or after adding new palettes or changing the rendering pipeline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Transforms vague UI/feature requests into structured, optimized prompts with design system awareness. Use when generating prompts for UI implementation, feature specification, or design-to-code translation. Triggers on tasks requiring prompt refinement, UI specification, or design system integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Socratic design refinement before implementation — challenges assumptions, surfaces alternatives, identifies risks before code is written

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate and edit high-quality images using Google's Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) AI model. Use this skill when working with AI image generation or editing tasks including (1) Creating images from text prompts with professional quality, (2) Editing existing images with natural language instructions, (3) Multi-turn iterative image refinement, (4) Product photography and marketing visuals, (5) Creating infographics and diagrams with text, (6) Photorealistic and artistic image generation, (7) Batch image generation workflows, (8) Testing and troubleshooting Gemini image generation API. Supports up to 4K resolution, multiple aspect ratios, reference images, and advanced prompting techniques for cinema-quality results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when effectful, security-sensitive code needs refinement-typed, SMT-backed verification in F*, in the HACL* or Project Everest style.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a strict multi-iteration Reflex Loop with phases (PLAN, PRODUCE||PREPARE, EVALUATE, CRITIQUE, REFINE) to improve an artifact until quality gates pass or iteration limits are reached. Use when user asks for iterative refinement, quality-gated generation, or "generate -> critique -> refine" loops.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a strict multi-iteration Reflex Loop with phases (PLAN, PRODUCE||PREPARE, EVALUATE, CRITIQUE, REFINE) to improve an artifact until quality gates pass or iteration limits are reached. Use when user asks for iterative refinement, quality-gated generation, or "generate -> critique -> refine" loops.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /aif-plan or to improve an /aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Process and generate multimedia content using Google Gemini API. Capabilities include analyze audio files (transcription with timestamps, summarization, speech understanding, music/sound analysis up to 9.5 hours), understand images (captioning, object detection, OCR, visual Q&A, segmentation), process videos (scene detection, Q&A, temporal analysis, YouTube URLs, up to 6 hours), extract from documents (PDF tables, forms, charts, diagrams, multi-page), generate images (text-to-image, editing, composition, refinement). Use when working with audio/video files, analyzing images or screenshots, processing PDF documents, extracting structured data from media, creating images from text prompts, or implementing multimodal AI features. Supports multiple models (Gemini 2.5/2.0) with context windows up to 2M tokens.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when running or interpreting VCSDD adversarial reviews. Provides calibration guidance for the Adversary agent, finding severity classification, and anti-leniency enforcement patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Polishing pass over all open beads. Run 4–6 times. "Check your beads N times, implement once." Use after plan-to-beads and between refinement rounds.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Polishing pass over all open beads. "Check your beads N times, implement once." Run 4–6 times. Use after /plan-to-beads and between refinement rounds.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Craft effective AI image prompts with structured syntax, style control, and iterative refinement techniques.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Zod schema validation patterns for TypeScript - schema definitions, type inference, refinements, transforms, discriminated unions

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when designing, generating an MVP blueprint for, auditing, troubleshooting, refactoring, or explaining an agentic harness for any domain. Covers provider-neutral agent architecture for OpenAI, Anthropic, and OpenAI-compatible APIs: agent loops, tool design, record provenance, interactive presentation, user-memory lifecycles, environment-adaptive tools, speculative tool execution, late-bound capabilities, permissions, system prompts, planning, goals, always-on agents and durable runtime, adaptive agent teams, context compaction, memory, skills, MCP/external connectors, public-board communications, realtime voice agents, hardware agents and board deployment, self-refining recursive harnesses, programmable context, continual refinement, observability, evals, prompt caching, agent-legible environments, feedback loops, and safety.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.