'simplify' 검색 결과

Remove AI-generated code slop, unnecessary comments, and over-engineering from the current branch diff. Cleans up boilerplate, simplifies abstractions, strips defensive code, and in skill-file mode lints SKILL.md files for quality. Use when cleaning up code, simplifying, removing boilerplate, before committing, or when reviewing a skill before promoting it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Refactor code after tests pass. The "Refactor" phase of Red-Green-Refactor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manage software complexity through deep modules, information hiding, and strategic programming. Use when the user mentions "module design", "API too complex", "shallow class", "complexity budget", "strategic vs tactical", "deep module", "information leakage", "pass-through method", "this code is over-engineered", or "simplify this design". Also trigger when reviewing an interface for simplicity, evaluating whether an abstraction is pulling its weight, deciding whether a comment is worth writing, or choosing between general-purpose and special-purpose approaches. Covers deep vs shallow modules, red flags for complexity, and comments as design documentation. For code quality, see clean-code. For architecture boundaries, see clean-architecture.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Craft messages that are understood, remembered, and drive action using the SUCCESs checklist (Simple, Unexpected, Concrete, Credible, Emotional, Stories). Use when the user mentions "make it memorable", "no one remembers our pitch", "tagline", "value proposition", "why the message isnt landing", "curse of knowledge", or "concrete language". Also trigger when writing a pitch deck, simplifying a complex product explanation, or making a presentation more compelling. Covers the six SUCCESs traits and the curse of knowledge. For narrative brand frameworks, see storybrand-messaging. For viral sharing, see contagious.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Redesign GitHub README homepages or create project-native pure SVG, hybrid SVG-composed PNG/WebP, and opt-in animated GIF assets. Use when a user asks to beautify, redesign, rebrand, visually upgrade, simplify, or audit a GitHub README; create only a hero, section headers, diagrams, badges, motion graphics, showcase modules, or other README assets; or turn a repository homepage into a cohesive visual story. If whole-README work versus asset-only work is unclear, ask which scope the user wants. For hero-like assets where pure SVG and generated raster material are both viable, explain the tradeoffs and confirm the implementation before creating the asset.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Explain any topic, code, concept, or error tailored to a specific audience's level of understanding. Use this skill whenever the user says 'explain like I am', 'ELI5', 'explain this to my', 'break this down for', 'dumb it down', 'simplify this for', or asks you to explain something to a specific person or audience type (e.g., 'explain this to a manager', 'how would I explain this to my mom', 'make this understandable for a 5th grader'). Also trigger when the user mentions wanting to understand something at a particular level, or asks for an explanation targeting a non-technical audience. Even partial matches like 'explain to my wife' or 'tell my boss' should trigger this skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Keep a change small and in the existing idiom - size the plan and weigh smaller alternatives before writing it, reuse the mechanism that already owns the behavior instead of adding a parallel one, and simplify the diff before handoff. Use when planning any change beyond a few lines, before readying a PR, or when reviewing agent-written code for bloat.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create or revise agent skills. Use when adding a new skill file, renaming a skill, simplifying an existing skill, improving trigger descriptions, or deciding what belongs in a skill versus references, scripts, assets, or ordinary docs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure or clean up code with no behavior change, proved by before-and-after checks. Use when: asked to clean up, extract, dedupe or simplify, even one function.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write and simplify C# property-based, model-based, and executable specification tests with CsCheck. Use for generators, shrinking, stateful command sequences, Spec guards and rules, implementation conformance, or replaying generated failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to simplify Swift code, reduce boilerplate, or make Swift more readable and idiomatic without changing behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Modern, interactive alternative to `/do` — clarify intent up front, then take a task end-to-end with a serial AI review gauntlet (lens debate (lowy ⇄ hickey) → codex debate → simplify → code-police, each editing the branch in turn) → CI → evidence. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/be` or `$be`; never auto-select from a natural-language request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run /be's review gauntlet SERIALLY — /lens-debate (lowy ⇄ hickey), then /codex-debate, then /simplify, then code-police, each editing and committing on the live branch in turn. Use from /be §4, or when the user asks to "run the review gauntlet". Requires Claude Code's Skill tool.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyse a learning task for cognitive load problems and recommend specific design improvements. Use when tasks overwhelm students, instructions feel complex, or materials need simplifying.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert patterns for simplifying 3D games to 2D including dimension reduction strategies, 2.5D fake-depth, isometric ports, camera flattening, physics conversion, 3D-to-sprite art pipeline, and control simplification. Use when porting 3D to 2D, building 2.5D / isometric / fake-depth gameplay, creating 2D versions for mobile, or prototyping. Trigger keywords: CharacterBody3D to CharacterBody2D, Camera3D to Camera2D, Vector3 to Vector2, flatten Z-axis, 2.5D, isometric, fake depth, Y-sort, simulated Z, orthogonal projection, 3D to sprite conversion, performance optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert patterns for simplifying 3D games to 2D including dimension reduction strategies, 2.5D fake-depth, isometric ports, camera flattening, physics conversion, 3D-to-sprite art pipeline, and control simplification. Use when porting 3D to 2D, building 2.5D / isometric / fake-depth gameplay, creating 2D versions for mobile, or prototyping. Trigger keywords: CharacterBody3D to CharacterBody2D, Camera3D to Camera2D, Vector3 to Vector2, flatten Z-axis, 2.5D, isometric, fake depth, Y-sort, simulated Z, orthogonal projection, 3D to sprite conversion, performance optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reduce a change to the minimum that solves the problem. Use when code is over-engineered or a diff is bloated.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

절제미를 측정 가능한 규칙으로 — 덜어내기(subtraction)·여백·위계를 AUDIT(렌더된 페이지를 데스크톱·모바일에서 재서 규칙별 PASS/FAIL+수치)하거나 APPLY(인벤토리 → 필요 없는 것 삭제 → 중복 병합 → 비운 자리를 초점 요소에 준다 → 재측정)한다. 초점 1개(1등 ≥ 2× 2등), 첫 화면 조각 ≤ 5, 서체 크기 ≤ 4, 헤드라인 ≤ 2줄, 첫 화면 단어 예산, 히어로 CTA ≤ 2, 액센트 1개, 장식 선·그리드·eyebrow 금지, 첫 화면 빈 면적 ≥ 65%, 얇은 화면 금지, 페이지 길이 예산. 규칙마다 출처 등급(실측/관례/휴리스틱). '덜어내 줘', '절제미', '너무 복잡해', '여백 살려줘', '심플하게', 'too busy', 'simplify the page', 'declutter', 'more whitespace', 「余白を活かして」, 「引き算のデザイン」, 「留白」, 「太擁擠了」 류에 트리거. 브랜드 토큰은 DESIGN.md가 이기고, 이 스킬은 양과 위계만 다룬다.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

절제미를 측정 가능한 규칙으로 — 덜어내기(subtraction)·여백·위계를 AUDIT(렌더된 페이지를 데스크톱·모바일에서 재서 규칙별 PASS/FAIL+수치)하거나 APPLY(인벤토리 → 필요 없는 것 삭제 → 중복 병합 → 비운 자리를 초점 요소에 준다 → 재측정)한다. 초점 1개(1등 ≥ 2× 2등), 첫 화면 조각 ≤ 5, 서체 크기 ≤ 4, 헤드라인 ≤ 2줄, 첫 화면 단어 예산, 히어로 CTA ≤ 2, 액센트 1개, 장식 선·그리드·eyebrow 금지, 첫 화면 빈 면적 ≥ 65%, 얇은 화면 금지, 페이지 길이 예산. 규칙마다 출처 등급(실측/관례/휴리스틱). '덜어내 줘', '절제미', '너무 복잡해', '여백 살려줘', '심플하게', 'too busy', 'simplify the page', 'declutter', 'more whitespace', 「余白を活かして」, 「引き算のデザイン」, 「留白」, 「太擁擠了」 류에 트리거. 브랜드 토큰은 DESIGN.md가 이기고, 이 스킬은 양과 위계만 다룬다.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Merge/simplify an over-fragmented outline to hit a paper-like section budget (NO PROSE): target final ToC ~6–8 H2, fewer thicker H3.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.