'codebase' 검색 결과

Review code for readability, then simplify it to be easy to follow and understand. Use this skill when the user wants to simplify code, improve readability, clean up for handoff, make code skimmable, reduce complexity, refactor for clarity, strip boilerplate, prepare code for future maintainers, or make a codebase easier to pick up. Trigger liberally — any request touching readability, simplification, cleanup, or "make this easier to understand" should use this skill. Also trigger when the user says things like "review this", "clean this up", "tidy this", "make this simpler", "reduce complexity", "flatten this", "strip the noise", or "I want to understand this code quickly next time I open it".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Craft a single, high-quality GitHub issue from a developer's description of a bug, unexpected behavior, or desired enhancement. Walks through reproduction, codebase exploration, and structured drafting so the issue is actionable on arrival. Use when user wants to file an issue, report a bug, request a feature, or document a problem they've encountered.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Applies a modern CSS reset covering box-sizing, margin removal, text rendering, media defaults, and root stacking context. Use when starting a new web project, creating a global stylesheet, or when the codebase lacks sensible CSS defaults.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates IEEE-format LaTeX technical reports from project requirements and codebase evidence, using academic prose, pseudocode-only explanations, BibTeX references, and IEEEtran formatting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diff-scoped correctness review that reads the codebase around the change — callers, contracts, and invariants — and returns line-anchored findings ranked by severity with confidence, then a merge-risk verdict. Use for reviewing a PR, diff, or named change set. Not for style review, approvals-as-rubber-stamp, or editing the code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Records decisions and documentation. Use when making architectural decisions, changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Optimize Bazel builds for large-scale monorepos. Use when configuring Bazel, implementing remote execution, or optimizing build performance for enterprise codebases.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Repository-specific AGENTS.md authoring and maintenance workflow. Use when creating, refreshing, or expanding AGENTS.md coverage for a codebase, including deciding whether nested AGENTS.md files are needed for subsystems with distinct rules, workflows, or AI-sensitive constraints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You are reviewing housing management software or tenant management systems - Someone asks about Section 8, LIHTC, or public housing program compliance - You need to audit unit allocation algorithms for fairness or bias - A project involves waitlist management, income verification, or rent calculations - You are evaluating HUD compliance (50058, EIV, PIC submissions) - Someone mentions Fair Housing, reasonable accommodation, or protected class handling - You need to review HQS/NSPIRE inspection tracking or abatement workflows - A codebase handles tenant eligibility, subsidy calculations, or housing vouchers TRIGGER PHRASES: "affordable housing", "Section 8", "LIHTC", "public housing", "waitlist management", "income verification", "Fair Housing", "HUD compliance", "rent calculation", "housing voucher", "tenant management", "HQS inspection", "unit allocation", "housing authority"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform 12-Factor Agents compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating agent architecture, reviewing LLM-powered systems, or auditing agentic applications against the 12-Factor methodology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to audit ad revenue performance or diagnose yield drops - Someone asks about header bidding configuration or Prebid.js optimization - You are analyzing fill rates, eCPM trends, or ad unit performance - A project involves programmatic advertising, SSP integration, or ad serving - You need to verify ads.txt, sellers.json, or supply chain compliance - Someone mentions CPM floors, bid density, or auction dynamics - You are evaluating ad quality controls, viewability, or ad-related UX impact - A codebase integrates Google Ad Manager, AdMob, Prebid, or any SSP TRIGGER PHRASES: "ad yield", "eCPM", "fill rate", "header bidding", "Prebid", "programmatic ads", "ad monetization", "CPM optimization", "ad revenue", "ads.txt", "ad serving", "SSP", "ad unit performance", "viewability"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when the user asks for an accessibility review, accessibility audit, a11y check, WCAG compliance review, screen reader audit, "is this accessible?", "does my site meet WCAG?", "check my component for accessibility", "accessibility overview of this page", "review accessibility of", "check for a11y issues", "fix accessibility issues", or any request to audit a web page, component, or codebase for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform 12-Factor App compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating application architecture, auditing SaaS applications, or reviewing cloud-native applications against the original 12-Factor methodology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use to start a new product on Cradle or to add the Cradle skeleton to an existing repository — writes cradle.json, the project-facts instruction (.apm/instructions/project.instructions.md), documents/{ddd,ai-notes,infra-design,codebase} templates, CI, and a compiling Lean executable-spec scaffold with a minimal example domain, mockup and CLI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when adding or changing REST endpoints or the OpenAPI contract — deriving endpoints from the Lean commands and views, writing documents/codebase/openapi.yaml first, then regenerating the backend controller interfaces and the frontend client.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Set up automatic keepalive for Appwrite free-tier projects to prevent them from being paused after 7 days of inactivity. Use when working in a codebase that uses Appwrite, when the developer mentions Appwrite free tier, project pausing, or keeping an Appwrite project alive, or when you detect Appwrite configuration (node-appwrite dependency, APPWRITE_ env vars, Appwrite SDK imports).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ask the local Claude CLI to review plans, diffs, full codebases, completed work, and exploit chains when the user explicitly wants a Claude second opinion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.