364건 · 관련도순
Adversarial 5-7 question challenge to a deck's pedagogical choices — ordering, prerequisites, cognitive load, motivation. Use when user says "devil's advocate", "poke holes in this deck", "push back on my slides", "stress-test the design", "what would a skeptical student ask?". Read-only; surfaces questions to force rethinking. Lighter than `/pedagogy-review`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Mechanize Pattern 15 — the seven-pass adversarial review protocol for academic manuscripts. Spawns 7 fresh-context subagents in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations), then synthesizes a prioritized revision checklist. Use for submission-ready or R&R-stage papers where single-pass review isn't enough.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED or two consecutive rounds turn up nothing new (fallback cap 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the `.qmd` rendered and a `.pdf` benchmark.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via --peer --stress; reviewer-disposition variance reporting via --peer --variance N. Auto-invokes /review-r + /audit-reproducibility on referenced scripts unless --no-cross-artifact.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Leverage OpenAI Codex/GPT models for autonomous code implementation, code review, and plan review. Triggers: "codex", "use gpt", "gpt-5", "let openai", "full-auto", "adversarial review", "second opinion review", "用codex", "让gpt实现", "对抗式审查", "让codex审查计划", "第二意见". Use this skill whenever the user wants to delegate coding tasks to OpenAI models, run code or plan reviews via codex, get a second-opinion review from a different model, or execute tasks in a sandboxed environment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
针对方案或设计的高强度追问式面试（adversarial design review / grill session），暴露假设漏洞与缺失约束，过程中同步维护领域模型（术语表和 ADR）。手动调用 /grill-me。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Automated code review and fix for local branches, PRs, commits, and files. Supports single-agent interactive fix and multi-agent adversarial review with auto-fix.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A-share sector research: computes board-wide Top N gainers, cross-checks week/month announcement windows across two sources, and grades market-sentiment evidence (L1–L3), via parallel Agent Team execution with fresh-context adversarial verification. Use for 「XX 行业 Top N/Top 10 标的」, 「这些标的最近一周/一个月发过哪些公告」, 「判断 XX 行业/板块现在的市场情绪」, or 「用 Agent Team 做行业投研」/对抗验证行业研究结论。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs adversarial due-diligence on a benchmark the user envies — a founder, KOL, company, or product whose success looks inflated — splitting marketing bubble from real signal, then mapping the validated playbook onto the user's own resources. Use for 尽调/对标/拆解 a competitor, 抄/偷师 their playbook, or suspecting 水分/泡沫 in claims. Prefer over deep-research when debunking inflated claims, not a neutral briefing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Trigger: judgment day, judgement day, dual review, adversarial review, juzgar. Run explicit blind dual review with at most two scoped fix/re-judgment rounds.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a large, multi-session goal (e.g. shipping a whole side product) through the full V-model closed loop, one phase at a time, with cross-session state and a final north-star acceptance gate. Ultragoals never downgrade the lane: every phase runs CP-1→CP-6 with adversarial verification. Opt-in: invoke with /ultragoal or by calling something a long-running goal. Ordinary work does not run this.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when revising an ACM CCS paper for a precise threat model, calibrated attack/defense claims, 12-page ACM sigconf compression, double-blind wording, adaptive-evaluation honesty, and the security house style that survives an adversarial SIGSAC program committee.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when designing or auditing ACM CCS experiments, attack demonstrations, adaptive-attack defense evaluations, security measurements, baselines, overhead and cost reporting, ablations, and claim-to-evidence fit, with emphasis on evidence that survives an adversarial program committee rather than leaderboard wins.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when explaining or planning around ACM CCS peer review, the two-cycle HotCRP workflow, decision categories including minor revision, the rebuttal window, the adversarial reviewer pool, ethics and disclosure scrutiny, meta-review dynamics, and ACM proceedings outcomes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when drafting an ACM CCS rebuttal during the HotCRP author-response window, covering threat-model defenses, adaptive-attack objections, ethics and disclosure questions, anonymity constraints, adversarial reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused replies aimed at the meta-reviewer.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content. Use when fact-checking legal documents, validating citations, detecting hallucinations, scoring document quality, or assessing distribution readiness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "scan AI systems for security threats", "check for prompt injection vulnerabilities", "assess model security posture", "detect data poisoning risks", or "audit AI/ML pipeline security".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots. Use when you need plan validation, board prep, hard-decision frameworks, or pre/post-mortem failure analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pre-landing PR review with two-pass checklist. Pass 1 critical: SQL safety, race conditions, LLM trust boundaries, enum completeness. Pass 2 informational: side effects, magic numbers, dead code, test gaps. Adversarial review auto-scaled by diff size. Scope drift detection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Fully automated ship workflow: pre-flight, merge base, run tests, coverage audit, pre-landing review, design review, adversarial review, version bump, CHANGELOG generation, TODOS.md update, bisectable commits, push and PR creation, auto-sync docs via document-release.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-AI second opinion via OpenAI Codex CLI. Three modes: Review (pass/fail gate), Challenge (adversarial edge-case finder), Consult (freeform with session continuity). Read-only with streaming output and thinking traces. Cross-model analysis when review has already run.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.