185건 · 관련도순
Edits raw travel footage into polished Instagram Reels (9:16, 1080×1920) with cinematic color grading, beat-synced cuts, text overlays, transitions, and background music. Use when the user mentions editing a reel, travel reel, Instagram video, cutting footage, travel clips, reel from footage, or provides folders with destination subfolders and optional shared _music or _fonts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit and repair Gaia user-tree timelines so every skill's current rank is explained by a chain of Hero's Journey events. Trigger this skill when: a contributor's profile chart shows a stale rank (e.g. still shows 3★ after a demotion to 1★); someone asks to "trace what happened" to a skill's rank; `validate_timelines.py` is failing in CI; you need to backfill missing `demote` or `rank_up` events before cutting a release; a skill was reclassified or Star-Bar-reset and the user tree was never updated; or any time the registry node and user tree disagree on a skill's current level. Uses `scripts/trace_timeline.py` (dry-run + apply) and `scripts/validate_timelines.py` (CI gate). Do NOT hand-edit `timeline[]` arrays — the script synthesises properly labelled events with `previousValue`/`newValue` so the rank chart plots correctly.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Drilling and Boring Machine Tool Setter, Operator, or Tender — deciding whether a hole's depth-to-diameter ratio requires peck drilling, establishing a straight hole start before wander compounds, reducing cutting parameters for a long-reach boring setup versus a short-reach one, or diagnosing whether a dimensional drift traces to tool wear rather than assuming the tool still looks sharp.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) Tool Programmer — calculating stepover from a scallop-height/surface-finish spec instead of picking one by feel, deciding whether a toolpath needs a dry run before cutting material on an unfamiliar post-processor/machine pairing, verifying datum consistency across multiple part setups, or diagnosing why cycle time jumped after a "minor" parameter change.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Continuous Mining Machine Operator in underground coal — reading a methane monitor trend and deciding whether to de-energize, judging whether cumulative unbolted advance has hit the roof control plan's cut-depth limit, deciding whether a permissibility defect requires immediate shutdown in a gassy heading, diagnosing whether a shift's production shortfall traces to cutting rate or shuttle-car haulage, or deciding whether a "drummy" roof sound stops the cut.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a carpenter's helper — cutting and staging lumber to a carpenter's layout marks, assembling and standing framed wall panels, running a material take-off and waste calculation for a framing package, or recognizing when a jobsite condition (a missing guardrail component, a nail-gun trigger setting, a header that doesn't match the plan) is a stop rather than a workaround.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a cement mason / concrete finisher — timing float and trowel work against bleed water and set, laying out and cutting control joints on a slab, choosing air-entrainment and mix parameters for freeze-thaw exposure, adjusting a finishing schedule for hot- or cold-weather concreting, or diagnosing a slab defect (blistering, scaling, random cracking) after the fact.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Carpenter — sizing a header for a bearing-wall opening, laying out and cutting stair stringers to code, checking a rough opening before a door or window goes in, deciding whether framing lumber is dry enough to close in, or field-modifying engineered lumber (I-joists, LVL) without voiding its rating.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Video editing expert covering cutting techniques, pacing, color grading, and post-production workflows
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Master Rust 1.75+ with modern async patterns, advanced type system features, and production-ready systems programming. Expert in the latest Rust ecosystem including Tokio, axum, and cutting-edge crates. Use PROACTIVELY for Rust development, performance optimization, or systems programming.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-ticket batch workflow. Takes a batch of tickets, plans execution order, implements each via /implement in autonomous mode, runs cross-cutting quality passes, and presents results for final review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply these opinionated .NET 8 architecture conventions whenever structuring or reviewing a backend service: clean architecture layering and which direction dependencies point, when CQRS with MediatR is worth it, cross-cutting concerns as pipeline behaviours, minimal APIs grouped by feature, keeping DbContext in Infrastructure, health checks and structured logging, WebApplicationFactory integration tests, and when AOT pays off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Before finishing any code (endpoint, query, migration, render, file, infra, dependency, test) — the senior pre-ship checklist of invisible cross-cutting controls AI omits, with backstop greps
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Load this skill when building any web feature, reviewing architecture decisions, or evaluating JavaScript dependencies. Under no circumstances build features that break completely when JavaScript is unavailable or fails. Absolutely always start with semantic HTML, layer CSS enhancements, and add JavaScript as the final, optional layer. Prioritize resilience and universal access over cutting-edge features.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use on every code change — commit structure, branching, history hygiene, and versioning. Apply when committing work, opening or splitting a branch, writing commit messages, cutting a release, or recovering from a bad history state.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run Tamanu pre-release verification checks: verify that hotfixes on the current release branch are merged forward to main, and that hotfixes from prior release branches are included in the current release. Use when the user wants to run "pre-release checks", verify hotfix integrity before cutting or shipping a Tamanu release, confirm a release/X.YY branch is safe to release, or check that no hotfix has been orphaned (left on neither main nor the current release). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check upgrade safety for a Tamanu upgrade that spans many versions: verify that every intermediate hotfix is included in the target version, and surface the new configuration/settings, data migrations, and FHIR rematerialisation impact the upgrade brings. Use when the user wants to check an upgrade from one Tamanu version to another (e.g. "check hotfixes from v2.31 to v2.47"), confirm no intermediate hotfix was dropped, or understand what config, migrations, and FHIR rework a multi-version jump requires. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for cutting a release (see release-cutoff-checks) or deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn an article URL into a clean, vault-ready markdown note with the defuddle CLI, stripping ads, navigation and comments and cutting 40-60% of tokens versus a raw fetch. Prefer it over a raw web fetch whenever the task is reading or ingesting a normal web article. Triggers: "/defuddle <url>", "clean import this page".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Gym workout planner and nutrition tracker. Search 690+ exercises by muscle, equipment, or category via wger. Look up macros and calories for 380,000+ foods via USDA FoodData Central. Compute BMI, TDEE, one-rep max, macro splits, and body fat — pure Python, no pip installs. Built for anyone chasing gains, cutting weight, or just trying to eat better.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook (NASA/SP-2016-6105 Rev 2). Use for NASA's systems-engineering process model — the SE Engine and 17 common technical processes, the program/project life cycle (Pre-Phase A through F), Key Decision Points and technical reviews (MCR/SRR/PDR/CDR/…), stakeholder expectations, technical requirements, design solution, product verification and validation, and crosscutting technical management (planning, risk, configuration, interfaces, data, assessment, decision analysis). Strong for aerospace/spaceflight project SE and lifecycle gating; NASA-specific terminology (KDPs, NPR 7123.1).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.