232건 · 관련도순
EU 사용자 대상 서비스용 Privacy Notice·Terms of Service·Consent Modal·Cookie Banner 자동 생성. GDPR (Regulation 2016/679) + ePrivacy Directive + Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83 + Digital Services Act + Digital Content Directive + Unfair Terms Directive 반영. 영문 인터뷰로 진행.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Responsible AI development and ethical considerations. Use when evaluating AI bias, implementing fairness measures, conducting ethical assessments, or ensuring AI systems align with human values.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Use for FFP-by-period, FFP-by-deliverable, SOW/PWS decomposition, implied-multiplier analysis, and fixed-price scenario comparisons. Do NOT use for Labor Hour, T&M, or cost-reimbursement IGCEs (use IGCE Builder LH/T&M or IGCE Builder CR). Do NOT use for grant budgets. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Trigger for: Labor-Hour IGCE, LH estimate, Time-and-Materials IGCE, T&M estimate, burdened hourly rate, burden multiplier, labor-category ceiling hours, materials estimate, proposed LH/T&M rate validation, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable LH/T&M estimates using BLS OEWS wages, explicit burden multipliers, GSA CALC+ positioning, GSA Per Diem travel, and separately priced T&M materials. Do NOT use for FFP, cost-reimbursement, grants, or cooperative agreements. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Trigger for: cost-reimbursement IGCE, CR cost estimate, CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, cost-plus estimate, BAA estimate, fixed-fee analysis, award-fee analysis, incentive-fee analysis, proposed CR rate validation, cost-pool buildup, share-ratio scenario, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable CR estimates using BLS OEWS wages, fringe/overhead/G&A/FCCM pools, contract-type-specific fee, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Do NOT use for FFP, LH/T&M, grants, or cooperative agreements. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review IEEE conference, journal, Transactions, Letters, or magazine manuscripts from a technical reviewer perspective using routed IEEE review gates. Use when evaluating scope fit, novelty, validity, data, clarity, compliance, advancement, engineering significance, method soundness, experiment sufficiency, baseline fairness, figure/table quality, formatting risks, rejection risk, major revision strategy, pre-submission readiness, or the quality and specificity of reviewer comments that may be generic, careless, contradictory, or possibly AI-generated.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when handling external API rate limits (e.g., OpenAI 429s, HubSpot or Stripe rate limits), preventing duplicate work from rapid event bursts (debouncing user actions), spreading load over time, ensuring per-tenant fairness, processing events in batches, limiting concurrent runs of the same operation, or assigning priority to important runs. Covers Inngest flow control: concurrency limits with keys, throttling, rate limiting, debounce, priority, singleton, and event batching.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Open-source FAIR biology data framework. Version artifacts (AnnData, DataFrame, Zarr), track lineage, validate via ontologies (Bionty), query datasets. Integrates with Nextflow, Snakemake, W&B, scVI. For scRNA-seq use scanpy; for ontology lookups use bionty.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Model interpretability via SHAP (Shapley values from game theory). Covers explainer choice (Tree, Deep, Linear, Kernel, Gradient, Permutation), feature attribution, and plots (waterfall, beeswarm, bar, scatter, force, heatmap). Use to explain ML predictions, rank features, debug models, audit fairness, or compare models. Works with tree, deep, linear, and black-box models.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Respond to Google, Yelp, and industry reviews in the owner's voice -- gracious on the 5-stars, masterful on the 1-stars. Handles the angry customer, the unfair review, the fake review, and the one that mentions a legal or health issue. Every response written for the thousand future customers reading it.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use DIG (Dive into Graphs) to load graph-learning datasets, run graph generation, self-supervised learning, GNN explainability, 3D graph learning, GOOD OOD datasets, graph augmentation, fair graph learning, and large-scale graph workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use the fair-esm repository skill for protein language-model embeddings, ESMFold structure prediction, ESM-IF1 inverse folding, and zero-shot variant-effect scoring.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks about "mystery", "fair play", "clue", "red herring", "romance beats", "HEA", "thriller", "ticking clock", "horror", "dread", "MG", "YA", "middle grade", "young adult", "science fiction", "sci-fi", "fantasy", "quest", "chosen one", "historical fiction", "period voice", "anachronism", "comedy", "humour", "humor", "romcom", "farce", "satire", "running gag", "serial", "episodic", "web serial", "genre conventions", or wants genre-specific structural craft for a story project. NOT for a clue check as a revision pass (use revision-continuity).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate", "reindex", "repair registries", "check links", "run the continuity, pacing, clue, voice, or name checks", "count words", "summarize a story project", "import an existing manuscript", "export a manuscript", "run a build", "generate a diagram", "record revision-pass status with `story passes`", "run the story CLI", or wants deterministic maintenance on a Story Skills markdown project. It runs the CLI and reads its output; NOT for judging a finding or revising the story to fix it (use revision-continuity for continuity errors and revision passes, plot-structure for pacing, voice-style for voices and prose, genre-craft for clues and fair play), or for sharing a review copy with readers (use feedback-triage).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks for a "sensitivity reader", "authenticity reader", "cultural review", "is this portrayal okay", "real people in my novel", "defamation", "can I use song lyrics", "epigraph permission", "permissions", "quote permission", "fair use", "AI disclosure", "do I need to disclose AI", "send to my editor", "editorial round", "Word file for my editor", "editor review copy", "co-author", "collaborate on a book", "shared world", "back up my book", "does this echo my source", "similarity check", "check overlap with my earlier books", or wants to run human editorial, ethics, permissions, or collaboration workflows around a story project. NOT for contracts or selling rights (use publishing), or reader feedback rounds and review copies for readers, including the GitHub review-copy setup (use feedback-triage).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Picks random winners from lists, spreadsheets, or Google Sheets for giveaways, raffles, and contests. Ensures fair, unbiased selection with transparency.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when reasoning about generative AI, adversarial machine learning, neural network security, algorithmic fairness, or deep learning fundamentals. This skill channels the thinking of Ian Goodfellow, inventor of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Trigger this skill when the user asks about model robustness, mitigating bias, evaluating AI guardrails, designing generative models, or defending against adversarial attacks. Apply his frameworks of minimax games, adversarial feature learning, and worst-case robustness analysis to shift the user's perspective from average-case optimization to adversarial resilience.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Think and work like an expert Global Health Researcher. Use when a task calls for Global Health Researcher judgment. Reasons from burden, equity, and health-system building blocks through DHS/MICS/DHIS2/GBD triangulation, cluster and stepped-wedge designs, RE-AIM/CFIR implementation science, and CIOMS-fair partnership while treating survey weights, HMIS completeness, and GBD smoothing as first-class failure modes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Think and work like an expert High-Performance Computing Specialist. Use when a task calls for High-Performance Computing Specialist judgment. Reasons from NUMA topology and hybrid MPI+OpenMP+CUDA decomposition through Slurm fairshare/backfill job design, strong/weak scaling (Amdahl/Gustafson), Darshan/mpiP/Nsight profiling, and parallel HDF5/MPI-IO on Lustre while treating I/O storms, collectives bottlenecks, and rank-binding mistakes as first-class failure modes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Think and work like an expert Database Systems Researcher. Use when a task calls for Database Systems Researcher judgment. Reasons from storage hierarchy, concurrency semantics, query-optimization theory, and declared workload models through TPC-C/H, YCSB, and JOB benchmarks, Jepsen/Elle correctness checkers, and perf/blktrace/fio profiling while treating cardinality-estimation plan regressions, tail-latency spikes under skew, unfair fsync-disabled speedups, and benchmark-trick wins as first-class failure modes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provider-independent real estate media production for listing photos, virtual staging, property videos, walkthrough reels, floor-plan explainers, neighborhood clips, renovation concepts, agent ads, and generated or retouched property visuals. Use when creating, editing, reviewing, prompting, packaging, or approving real estate marketing content where property truthfulness, listing/MLS compliance, fair-housing risk, staging disclosure, privacy, accessibility, platform variants, or real-estate QA matter.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Valuation methods analysis, DCF inputs, comparable multiples, P/E ratio, EV/EBITDA, price to book, valuation assumptions, relative valuation, intrinsic value, fair value estimate
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
PEG valuation, Price Earnings to Growth ratio, Peter Lynch PEG methodology, growth-adjusted valuation, earnings growth rate, PE ratio valuation, PEG sector comparison, undervalued growth stocks, fair value PEG
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.