'improve' 검색 결과

Explore a codebase to find opportunities for architectural improvement, focusing on making the codebase more testable by deepening shallow modules. Use when user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more AI-navigable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan, implement, or review claude.md improver work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests claude.md improver work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Iterative rubric-based evaluation and self-improvement loop. Builds a scoring rubric interactively, evaluates an artifact with multiple models in parallel (Codex, Gemini, Claude), then autonomously improves the artifact one criterion at a time until a score threshold is met or circuit breaker fires. "/rulph", "rubric evaluate", "rubric score", "multi-model evaluate", "score and improve", "evaluate and iterate", "grade this", "루브릭 루프", "채점 루프", "자율 개선", "개선 루프", "루브릭 평가"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Accessibility (a11y) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible". Do NOT use for SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit) and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write and improve documentation for ComfyUI nodes in per-node JSON files. Use when asked to document nodes, write node descriptions, add tips to nodes, improve node docs, enrich node content, fill in empty node descriptions, or batch-write documentation for new/updated nodes. Also triggers on "write docs for nodes", "document the new nodes", "improve node tips", "fill in node descriptions", "enrich nodes", "node content pass", "update nodes", "sync comfyui nodes", "new comfyui version", or "node enrichment".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to audit or optimize an App Store or Google Play listing. Also use when the user mentions 'ASO audit,' 'app store optimization,' 'optimize my app listing,' 'improve app visibility,' 'app store ranking,' 'audit my listing,' 'why aren't people downloading my app,' 'improve my app conversion,' 'keyword optimization for app,' or 'compare my app to competitors.' Use when the user shares an App Store or Google Play URL and wants to improve it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes feedback logs to identify patterns and suggest improvements to review skills. Use when you have accumulated feedback data and want to improve review accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Self-improvement loop for multi-agent workflows. Diagnose failures, improve tool descriptions, and learn from success/failure patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Study a merged or shipped tdmcp implementation and extract reusable learnings: code improvements, runtime/UX lessons, test gaps, docs updates, roadmap items, and harness changes. Use when the user asks to learn from a completed feature/project/PR/build, analyze what can be improved from an implementation, or turn a real installation experience into actionable tdmcp improvements. This is a post-implementation learning harness; it does not replace tdmcp-pipeline for building or tdmcp-quality-audit for broad repo audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct a project or sprint retrospective by gathering data from status reports and velocity metrics, structuring what went well and what needs improvement, and generating actionable improvement items with owners and due dates. Use at the end of a sprint, after a project phase or milestone, following a significant incident or success, at a quarterly review of ongoing processes, or before starting a similar project to capture lessons learned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scaffold and run Karpathy-style autoresearch loops in any git repo. This skill should be used when setting up autonomous code improvement, generating adversarial eval harnesses, running hypothesis-implement-eval-keep/discard loops, or checking autoresearch progress. Triggers on "autoresearch", "autonomous improvement", "eval loop", "hypothesis loop", "self-improvement loop".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles. Also use when the user wants to improve a system prompt, a data pipeline, a writing style, or any artifact where quality can be decomposed into measurable tracks. For inference optimisation tasks (model latency, throughput, quantization, GPU deployment), a* delegates the low-level tuning to AITune while maintaining quality tracking and learning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Define a Lean Six Sigma improvement project using DMAIC, problem framing, baseline measures, root-cause hypotheses, CTQs, and control planning. Use when an existing process is underperforming and the team needs a charter, SIPOC, baseline, and improvement path. Do not use for brand-new process design or vague complaints with no process boundary.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Full design improvement pipeline — syncs your app to Google Stitch, generates alternatives, presents side-by-side comparison, and adopts cherry-picked improvements. Triggers: 'stitch pipeline', 'improve my design with stitch', 'make my app look better', 'stitch redesign everything'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Research and ideation partner for GAME DESIGN — think through design ideas before writing them into the GDD; produces a brief, never edits the GDD itself. Use to assess a genre or market for viability, dissect a reference game (mechanics → dynamics → aesthetics), explore how to improve or extend an existing system, flow, or content type, research new mechanics the design lacks, investigate a part of the GDD in code, or develop the research bucket of a /unikit-gd-review report into decided edits. Trigger on "explore how to improve the flow", "ways to improve the combat system", "is this genre saturated", "break down the combat of Hades", "work out the review's open questions". GAME-DESIGN research only — for CODE or technical research use /unikit-explore; to reconstruct a design from code use /unikit-gd-recon; to write a change into the GDD use /unikit-gd-system or /unikit-gd-spec; to apply edits you know use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a new game use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /unikit-plan or to improve a /unikit-fix plan, or when the user says "improve the plan", "what's wrong with the plan", or "update the plan from research". Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Synthesizes actionable feedback from validation results, confidence scores, and iteration triggers. Creates structured improvement guidance for re-execution. Activate on 'synthesize feedback', 'improvement suggestions', 'actionable feedback', 'iteration guidance', 'feedback generation'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically intercepts and optimizes prompts using the prompt-learning MCP server. Learns from performance over time via embedding-indexed history. Uses APE, OPRO, DSPy patterns. Activate on "optimize prompt", "improve this prompt", "prompt engineering", or ANY complex task request. Requires prompt-learning MCP server. NOT for simple questions (just answer them), NOT for direct commands (just execute them), NOT for conversational responses (no optimization needed).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides continuous improvement and change management for SMEs adopting AI. Applies Marginal Gains philosophy, Kaizen principles, and structured sprint methodologies to organizational transformation. Use when user asks about change management, continuous improvement, AI adoption strategy, team resistance, transformation roadmaps, or improvement sprints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AID Memory System for session feedback, learning cycles, and skill improvement. Manages state, feedback collection, and improvement analysis. Load for /aid-init, /aid-start, /aid-status, /aid-end, /aid-improve, /aid-memory, /aid-reset.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

既存Webアプリへ機能追加・UX改善・不具合修正を1件ずつ安全に実装して公開する。Codexで「既存アプリを改善」「機能を追加」「$improve-app」と依頼されたときに使用する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.