'mitm' 검색 결과

Assess a new customer request against agreed scope, trade-offs and ownership. Use when an engagement expands or a custom feature needs a commitment decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn meeting notes into an accountable register — extract decisions, actions and open questions, flag ownerless items, track follow-through. Use when commitments get dropped or a recurring meeting decides nothing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a trusted capture-and-triage front door so no commitment lives in your head. Use when open loops keep slipping, an inbox has become a backlog, or vague notes never turn into action.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Headcount and delivery-capacity planning — effective capacity from raw headcount, hire/contract/defer scenarios, and capacity-vs-commitment gap reports. Use when planning a quarter, sizing a hiring ask, or testing whether a roadmap fits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates consequence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whether authority, evidence, mandate, uncertainty, procedure, and review conditions remain sufficient.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cialdini's seven principles of compliance (the classic six — reciprocation, commitment-consistency, social proof, liking, authority, scarcity — plus Unity, added 2016) and Pre-Suasion. Use when crafting ethical persuasion (marketing, sales, negotiation), defending against manipulation, or designing systems that need cooperation. Includes replication-crisis caveats and known factual corrections (Bickman parking-meter numbers, Hofling modern replication, Drive Carefully condition disambiguation, Genovese myth).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework. Use when planning user interviews, getting product feedback, validating ideas, designing discovery questions, or extracting honest signal from biased customer responses. Covers good vs bad questions, deflecting compliments, anchoring fluff, pressing for commitment, and customer slicing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when persuasion principles have to be applied to a specific asset — reciprocity, scarcity, authority, social proof, liking, commitment, and unity mapped onto copy, a landing page, an email, or an ad, each with a hypothesis and a test plan. Trigger on 'marketing psychology', 'Cialdini', 'persuasion principles', 'how do I add urgency', 'make this more convincing', 'behavioral triggers for this page'. Also use when the user asks why people read the whole page and still do not buy. Not for — price framing and margin math, see `17-pricing-strategy-global`; building the offer itself, see `31-offer-design-global`; running the experiment properly, see `19-ab-test-setup-global`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Optimize cloud infrastructure costs through FinOps practices, commitment discounts, right-sizing, and automated cost management. Use when reducing cloud spend, implementing budget controls, or establishing cost visibility across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes environments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Help Kubernetes users build vArmor NetworkProxy egress allowlists from real audit evidence. Guide observation, HTTP/HTTPS MITM or SNI visibility, path and method review, TCP approval, and iterative refinement while preserving existing system protection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Takes meeting transcripts, extracts action items with owners and deadlines, detects implicit commitments, generates structured meeting summaries, and outputs task files compatible with Linear, GitHub Issues, and other project management tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a 13-week rolling cash flow forecast from bank exports, AR aging, AP bills, payroll, and recurring commitments -- the report that tells a small business whether it survives the quarter. Flags the crunch weeks early enough to act.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reduce AWS spend with rightsizing, autoscaling, commitment planning, and storage lifecycle policies. Use when running FinOps reviews, lowering cloud bills, or improving cost-per-request metrics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via acc_act(runtime="outcome").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create original short videos using the 训练复投｜计时检查触发受挫后重新上路 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan sprints with story point estimation, capacity planning, sprint goals, and retrospective frameworks. Organize teams for effective iteration with clear goals, realistic commitments, and continuous improvement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Simple task management using a shared TASKS.md file. Reference this when the user asks about their tasks, wants to add/complete tasks, or needs help tracking commitments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user is closing an ISO week, reviewing planned outcomes against evidence, interviewing work Areas, resolving unfinished commitments, or asking for "ретро", "weekly retro", "week review", or lessons from the week.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Condense rebuttal prose into fewer words without changing the original meaning. Use when a response block, paragraph, or selected passage is too long but all technical content, citations, and commitments must stay intact. Supports academic English.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Simple task management using a shared TASKS.md file. Reference this when the user asks about their tasks, wants to add/complete tasks, or needs help tracking commitments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.