Assess how applications use encryption, signed tokens, and random values. Identify implementation weaknesses, select relevant testing tools, and document causes and fixes for issues involving encryption modes, RSA parameters, predictable randomness, and key derivation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Assessing encrypted cookies and tokens
- Checking RSA keys and cryptographic settings
- Testing session token predictability
SnailSploit/Claude-Red☆ 7.6천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트
Manage Reddit account activity through a staged 30-day plan, progressing from browsing and voting to comments and brand promotion. Track daily work, publishing approvals, account progress, and follow-up replies using local records.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Start a staged activity plan for a new Reddit account
- Manage daily Reddit tasks and progress
- Review comment and post drafts before publishing
browser-act/skills☆ 6.2천2026년 8월 24일 업데이트
Test a web application using branch changes, selected pages, or the whole app as scope. Choose among three testing levels, document issues with evidence, fix them in separate commits, and verify results in a release-readiness report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Checking changed pages before opening a pull request
- Running a quick check for major bugs before committing
- Reviewing a release candidate for visual and functional issues
FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide☆ 6.2천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Investigate bugs by tracing symptoms through code and recent changes, reproducing failures, and testing a specific cause before fixing it. Produce a focused correction, a regression test to catch recurrence, and an evidence-based debugging report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Investigate errors that keep returning after fixes
- Trace a regression through recent changes
- Analyze failures that occur only in certain environments
FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide☆ 6.2천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Investigate bugs and failing tests through four stages: finding the root cause, comparing working patterns, testing a hypothesis, and implementing a fix. Uses reproduction steps, diagnostic evidence, and regression tests to check the result.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Tracing the cause of a failing test
- Following runtime errors back to invalid data
- Finding the change that broke working code
ChrisWiles/claude-code-showcase☆ 6.1천2026년 1월 7일 업데이트
Find repeated interface elements and shared visual values, then turn them into reusable components and design tokens, named values for colors or spacing. Update existing uses and document the additions within the project's design system.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Consolidating repeated buttons and cards
- Turning colors and spacing into shared tokens
- Unifying inconsistent interface components
fengshao1227/ccg-workflow☆ 5.9천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Turn paper reviews into structured, professional responses. Classify comments, choose whether to revise, defend, clarify, or propose experiments, and draft a rebuttal that addresses every point with evidence and a respectful tone.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Classifying reviewer comments by issue type
- Choosing a response strategy for each comment
- Drafting responses linked to paper sections or results
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar☆ 5.9천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Investigate code errors through a structured process using reproduction steps, logs, and testable explanations. The workflow guides fault isolation, fixes, and follow-up checks, with common error patterns for Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Bash/Zsh.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Investigating an error using logs and reproduction steps
- Finding why code broke after a recent change
- Troubleshooting common shell script errors
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar☆ 5.9천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Review academic papers before submission by checking structure, logic, citations, figures, and writing clarity. Audit major claims against available evidence, identify overstatement or missing support, and suggest whether each claim should be kept, softened, revised, or removed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Checking a paper before journal or conference submission
- Reviewing the structure and logic of a first draft
- Auditing claims for unsupported or overstated conclusions
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar☆ 5.9천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Prepare .NET projects for Native AOT, compilation before execution, and trimming, which removes unused code. Use build warnings to guide type annotations, reflection changes, and source-generated JSON serialization, then check all target frameworks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Preparing a .NET project for Native AOT
- Resolving IL warnings from trimming analysis
- Adding annotations to reflection code
dotnet/skills☆ 5.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Introduce nullable reference types into an existing C# project, making explicit which references may be null. Plan a staged migration, resolve compiler warnings, and clarify public API annotations while preserving runtime behavior.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Adopting nullable reference types in an existing C# project
- Migrating a large codebase file by file
- Clarifying nullability in public APIs
dotnet/skills☆ 5.7천2026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Analyze competitor landing pages from URLs or screenshots to understand their audience, promises, and messaging. Receive a structured score, concrete strengths and weaknesses, and recommendations for differentiating your own positioning and calls to action.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Researching competitor landing pages
- Comparing headlines and calls to action
- Finding opportunities to differentiate your messaging
irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills☆ 5.1천2026년 10월 13일 업데이트
Turn reviewer comments into a structured response document. The skill classifies concerns, suggests whether to revise, defend, clarify, or experiment, and drafts evidence-based replies while checking completeness, professional tone, and respectful wording.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Classifying reviewer comments by issue type
- Planning revisions and additional experiments
- Drafting responses to every reviewer comment
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Collect papers across research databases, turn research questions into targeted search queries, remove duplicate records, and extract available PDF links. Useful for preparing systematic literature reviews, with database selection and access checks before retrieval.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Collecting papers across multiple research databases
- Turning research questions into database search queries
- Removing duplicate records and finding PDF links
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Investigate code errors through a structured process using reproduction steps, logs, and testable explanations. The workflow guides fault isolation, fixes, and follow-up checks, with common error patterns for Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Bash/Zsh.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Investigating an error using logs and reproduction steps
- Finding why code broke after a recent change
- Troubleshooting common shell script errors
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Plan interviews and focus groups for qualitative research, which explores people’s experiences and views. Develop question guides, follow-up prompts, discussion plans, transcription conventions, and participant review procedures suited to the study.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Preparing a semi-structured interview guide
- Planning focus group discussions
- Choosing transcription conventions
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Organize interview transcripts and other qualitative material into codes, or meaning labels, and broader themes. Develop coding guidelines, compare researchers’ coding decisions, and document whether additional data still introduces new findings.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Developing a codebook for interview analysis
- Organizing codes into themes
- Checking agreement between researchers
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Extract statistical values from research PDFs for meta-analysis, which combines results across studies. Track each value’s source and confidence, prioritize review, and manage human corrections and final approval in a shared data structure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Extracting statistics from research PDFs
- Prioritizing uncertain or conflicting values for review
- Tracking human corrections and final approval
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Review academic slide decks or audit empirical analysis pipelines. It checks slide arguments, layout, and compilation, or reproduces numerical results in R, Stata, and Python to diagnose discrepancies and produce a formal report with prioritized recommendations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Reviewing academic slide arguments and layout
- Checking LaTeX compilation warnings
- Comparing empirical results across R, Stata, and Python
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Examine figures, tables, and empirical results before interpreting them. The skill reviews every visible feature, explores possible explanations, checks sample sizes and patterns across estimates, and records unresolved questions in a structured report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Reviewing a figure before publication
- Investigating unexpected spikes or dips
- Checking sample sizes across tables
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Choose AI tools for literature searches, PDF conversion, citation-backed questions, and review writing. The skill also installs and runs supported tools through a shared launcher, with workflows that connect paper retrieval, conversion, and analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Choosing tools for a literature review
- Converting research PDFs to Markdown
- Asking citation-backed questions across PDFs
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Investigate research questions by searching PubMed, assessing paper relevance, and following references and citing papers. Extract specific data and findings into an organized summary, with search methods, citation links, and screening records for later review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Find published data for a research question
- Start a literature review
- Expand a search through citation links
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals for sound methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and clear reporting. Produce a structured review that separates major concerns from minor issues and gives authors specific, constructive suggestions for revision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Preparing a structured review of a scientific manuscript
- Evaluating methods and statistics in a grant proposal
- Checking reproducibility and reporting guidelines
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트
Evaluate papers, research proposals, and literature reviews using structured criteria. Produces evidence-based feedback on research questions, methods, data, analysis, and writing, with optional scores and prioritized recommendations tailored to the work's stage and purpose.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
- Reviewing a paper before submission
- Assessing a research proposal's methods and feasibility
- Checking the coverage and synthesis of a literature review
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트