'thinking' 검색 결과

Challenge business plans, prepare for difficult board questions, and work through decisions with painful tradeoffs. This skill identifies assumptions and failure risks, examines stakeholder impacts, and turns postmortems into changes with clear owners and verification dates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find weaknesses in a business plan
• Prepare answers to difficult board questions
• Compare options for a difficult management decision

Explore development ideas and problems through conversation, code investigation, diagrams, and comparisons. The skill helps clarify requirements, weigh approaches, and surface risks before or during a change, with optional documentation of decisions when requested.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Clarify a vague feature idea and its requirements
• Investigate existing code to understand a problem
• Compare technical approaches and their tradeoffs

Examine feature ideas for existing products to uncover risky assumptions about customer value, usability, business support, and technical feasibility. Consider product, design, and engineering perspectives, then record potential failures, confidence levels, and suggested ways to test each assumption.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing assumptions behind a feature idea
• Assessing risks from three professional perspectives
• Planning how to test uncertain assumptions

Develop a product or side-project idea through guided questions and premise checks. Startup discussions examine evidence of demand, while builder discussions explore possibilities and scope, producing a design document before implementation begins.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Examining demand for a startup idea
• Defining the smallest useful internal project
• Shaping a hackathon or side-project idea

Analyze a problem by separating fundamental facts from policies and untested assumptions. The skill produces a component breakdown, a constraint table, and a rebuilt solution, helping explain which inherited assumptions may be limiting the available options.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Breaking down the causes of high costs
• Reviewing requirements inherited from past projects
• Reconsidering a design that has stalled

Investigate incidents and recurring defects with structured methods such as Five Whys and Fishbone cause maps. Identify multiple contributing conditions, build a blame-free account of what happened, and propose practical changes to prevent similar failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review a production outage
• Investigate recurring defects
• Compare failing and working environments

Build and run computer-use-demo in Docker, then use Playwright to test its Streamlit interface without opening a visible browser. Save conversation transcripts, API exchanges, and screenshots to inspect behavior after changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking the interface after changing computer-use-demo
• Testing combinations of models and tool versions
• Checking Thinking settings and model changes during a session

Examine important choices and assess claims by rebuilding their reasoning from basic knowledge. Use mental models, reusable ways to understand problems, to compare conclusions, identify unknowns, and consider long-term consequences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choosing a direction with long-term consequences
• Assessing the reasoning behind an expert's claims
• Building judgment in an unfamiliar field

Understand the shift from product manager to Director through scope and planning horizon. Identify role-transition difficulties and translate broad company priorities into product responsibilities and clearer direction for teams.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Understanding how PM and Director responsibilities differ
• Examining difficulties after a Director promotion
• Translating vague company strategy into team responsibilities

Apply a specific set of Rails conventions to design, implementation, and code review. It keeps business logic in models, represents state changes as records, limits dependencies, and uses Minitest with fixtures, or predefined test data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing Rails models and database changes
• Representing state changes with separate records
• Reviewing code for consistent Rails conventions

Explore development ideas and problems through conversation, code investigation, diagrams, and comparisons. The skill helps clarify requirements, weigh approaches, and surface risks before or during a change, with optional documentation of decisions when requested.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Clarify a vague feature idea and its requirements
• Investigate existing code to understand a problem
• Compare technical approaches and their tradeoffs

Investigate a Codex CLI session by matching its local conversation record with production router logs. Use the session ID to examine missing reasoning summaries, routing markers, unexpected models, or unusual tool calls and trace relevant code paths.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigate missing reasoning summaries
• Confirm which model actually served a turn
• Trace missing or unexpected routing markers

Investigate unexpected Claude Code output by matching a session’s local transcript with production router logs. Identify the serving model and trace response conversion code to explain empty blocks, tool output, or other rendering symptoms.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigate unexpected output in a specific session
• Examine an empty thinking block
• Match displayed content to the serving model and provider

Plan bug bounty sessions around a clear goal and selected vulnerability types. Guides movement through reconnaissance, mapping, discovery, proof, and reporting, with prompts and routing to help decide what to investigate next.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Set the goal for a hunting session
• Decide what to investigate next
• Map application roles and trust boundaries

Organize a bug bounty investigation from reconnaissance through reporting. The skill helps choose a focused objective, identify the current phase, select relevant techniques and tools, and distinguish reproducible security impact from misleading test results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Setting objectives at the start of an investigation
• Choosing the next step when testing stalls
• Replanning after switching targets

Estimate how an intervention affects outcomes using Bayesian causal analysis. The workflow confirms causal assumptions with the user, selects a suitable method, checks whether findings withstand challenges, and reports effects with uncertainty and limitations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Estimating the effect of a policy or intervention
• Mapping causal relationships before analysis
• Selecting a method for observational data

Evaluate research papers and scientific claims by examining study design, statistics, bias, and evidence quality. Receive a structured critique of strengths, weaknesses, supported conclusions, and practical improvements, with uncertainty and limitations made explicit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing a paper's methods and conclusions
• Assessing evidence quality across studies
• Checking scientific claims in media reports

Build applications that exchange live audio, video, and text with the Gemini Live API. Covers voice conversations, streaming transcription and translation, session recovery, authentication, and migration from older Live models in Python or JavaScript/TypeScript.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build an AI app for live voice conversations
• Add real-time transcription or speech translation
• Send camera or screen frames alongside audio

Examine an existing plan, decision, or design through one question at a time, each with a suggested answer. Clarify assumptions, contradictions, and dependencies, then summarize agreed decisions, needed changes, and unresolved blockers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Examine a plan before committing
• Untangle decisions that depend on each other
• Clarify an uncertain project scope

Explore research ideas through conversation, question assumptions, and connect approaches from different fields. Develop a broad set of possibilities, then assess promising directions and outline next steps such as pilot experiments or literature searches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Exploring directions for an early research project
• Finding connections across scientific disciplines
• Questioning assumptions when research feels stuck

Review scientific manuscripts and grant proposals using structured checklists. Assess methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting completeness, then organize findings into a balanced report with major concerns, minor comments, and specific suggestions for revision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting a structured journal peer review
• Reviewing methods in a grant proposal
• Checking a manuscript before revision

Assess how well scientific evidence supports a claim. Examine study design, statistical methods, bias, and alternative explanations, then explain supported conclusions, uncertainties, and improvements using established frameworks for judging evidence quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking whether a paper's conclusions follow from its data
• Comparing evidence behind conflicting research findings
• Identifying bias and alternative explanations

Search the web with a specific question using the included Python script. Receive an agent-generated answer with reference details, suggested follow-up questions when available, and token usage; optional console settings enable richer presentation features.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Researching recent news on a specific topic
• Getting answers with reference details
• Finding follow-up questions for further research

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.