'valuation' 검색 결과

Evaluates IPO pricing with comparable company analysis, IPO discount estimation, and investor demand assessment. Use when pricing IPOs, determining offering ranges, or analyzing IPO valuation methodologies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate msmodelslim evaluation YAML configuration (service_oriented + aisbench + vllm-ascend). Use when user asks for evaluation config generation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create evaluation frameworks for AI outputs with rubrics and scoring. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-evaluation-framework related tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide 409A valuation processes. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with 409a-valuation-guide related tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs financial ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction for strategic decision-making. Use when analyzing financial statements, building valuation models, assessing budget variances, or constructing financial projections and forecasts. Also applicable when users mention financial modeling, cash flow analysis, company valuation, financial projections, or spreadsheet analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation analysis to estimate intrinsic value per share. Triggers when user asks for fair value, intrinsic value, DCF, valuation, "what is X worth", price target, undervalued/overvalued analysis, or wants to compare current price to fundamental value.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Author and run offline evals for Agentforce agents: fixture format, scoring rubrics, hallucination checks, regression baselines, CI integration, prompt-change safety. Trigger keywords: agent eval, hallucination, doesn't hallucinate, agentforce offline evals, rubric for agent response. NOT for deciding which layers of testing the agent needs — use agentforce/agentforce-testing-strategy. NOT for Testing Center, AiEvaluationDefinition or sf agent test runs — use agentforce/agent-testing-and-evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when designing evaluation suites for agentic systems, choosing agent benchmarks, measuring multi-agent performance, or critiquing single-score evaluation of agents. Based on arXiv:2605.26112v1. Trigger phrases: "evaluate my agent", "benchmark agent", "measure agent reliability", "pass^k evaluation", "agent metrics beyond success rate", "trajectory quality", "memory hygiene metric", "longitudinal agent eval", "why my agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Professional financial analysis skill for investment decisions, budgeting, financial statement analysis, and business plan evaluation. Use this skill when you need to analyze financial ratios (profitability, safety, efficiency), calculate DCF/NPV/IRR valuations, perform budget variance analysis, or conduct sensitivity/scenario analysis. Triggers include "analyze financial statements", "calculate DCF", "investment evaluation", "budget variance", "財務分析", "投資評価", "予算差異分析".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns a business need and its constraints into a DRAFT RFP requirements pack: traced functional and non-functional requirements with priorities, mandatory gates, evaluation criteria with weights left to the business owner, and fact-seeking supplier questions. Solution-neutral; never names a supplier or product. Use when the user asks to "write the RFP requirements", "turn this business case into tender requirements", "draft the supplier questionnaire", "structure our RFQ from this brief" or "set up evaluation criteria before we go to market". Do not use for responses already received, use rfp-comparison-pack to compare them or supplier-evaluation-matrix to score them instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

DDD評価エージェント - 戦略的設計・戦術的設計の両面からDDD原則への適合度を評価し改善点を特定。/ddd-evaluation [対象パス] で呼び出し。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

評価統合エージェント - MMI評価とDDD評価の結果を統合し、優先度付き改善計画を策定。/integrate-evaluations [対象パス] で呼び出し。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate HTML reports and structured metrics from model evaluation results. Creates publication-ready reports with embedded outputs (images, audio, charts) and metrics.json for cross-model comparison. Use when generating reports, writing metrics, creating evaluation summaries, or formatting benchmark results. Triggers on "generate report", "write metrics", "create report", "evaluation summary", "benchmark results", "format results".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using feature flags. Watches the flag roster and the `$feature_flag_called` evaluation stream for contradictions between a flag's configured state and its real traffic: evaluation cliffs on healthy flags, ghost flags (code calling keys that no longer exist), response-distribution shifts with no corresponding flag edit, and flag debt (stale, fully-rolled-out, or dead flags still burning evaluations). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Open-source AI observability platform for LLM tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications with detailed traces, running evaluations on datasets, or monitoring production AI systems with real-time insights.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create evaluation frameworks for AI outputs with rubrics and scoring. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-evaluation-framework related tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guide 409A valuation processes. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with 409a-valuation-guide related tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.