201건 · 관련도순
Profile and audit mobile app performance -- cold/warm/hot startup time, memory leaks, battery drain, network efficiency, frame rate jank, and binary size. Triggers: diagnosing slow launches, investigating ANRs, reducing app size, or benchmarking rendering performance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze an HR operations system for headcount planning effectiveness, attrition pattern detection, compensation benchmarking accuracy, workforce analytics maturity, and onboarding process optimization..
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze donor retention and CRM systems — lapse risk scoring and prediction models, stewardship workflow automation, donor lifetime value (LTV) modeling, communication personalization engines, giving pattern analysis, and retention metric benchmarking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Benchmark franchise locations by comparing top and bottom quartile performance across revenue, profitability, and operational scores.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build data-driven compensation structures that attract talent without overpaying. Covers base salary bands, equity/bonus frameworks, geographic differentials, and total rewards packaging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Explore open-source GitHub repository source trees via web browsing to analyze and compare feature implementations at the code level. Supports two modes: cross-project comparison and single-project deep dive. Use when evaluating how OSS projects implement a specific feature, choosing architecture patterns, or benchmarking implementation strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Avalia modelos de geração de código em HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E e 15+ benchmarks com métricas pass@k. Use ao comparar modelos de código, avaliar capacidades de codificação, testar suporte multilíngue ou medir qualidade de geração de código. Padrão da indústria do BigCode Project usado pelos leaderboards do HuggingFace.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Testes e benchmarking de agentes LLM incluindo testes comportamentais, avaliação de capacidades, métricas de confiabilidade e monitoramento em produção—onde até os melhores agentes alcançam menos de 50% em benchmarks do mundo real. Use quando: testes de agentes, avaliação de agentes, benchmark de agentes, confiabilidade de agentes, teste de agentes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when designing evaluation suites for agentic systems, choosing agent benchmarks, measuring multi-agent performance, or critiquing single-score evaluation of agents. Based on arXiv:2605.26112v1. Trigger phrases: "evaluate my agent", "benchmark agent", "measure agent reliability", "pass^k evaluation", "agent metrics beyond success rate", "trajectory quality", "memory hygiene metric", "longitudinal agent eval", "why my agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when improving, evolving, benchmarking, or maintaining agent skills over time. Treats skills as long-lived structured artifacts: execute tasks, diagnose trajectory evidence, accumulate textual momentum, patch at the correct abstraction layer, test per model and harness, canary changes, and roll back regressions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run CIS Kubernetes Benchmark checks and remediate findings with kube-bench.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and run reproducible benchmarks. Use when measuring performance scaling, comparing branches, or analyzing speedup metrics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on re...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml. Part of cursor-rules-java project
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Investigate model specifications, requirements, and evaluation strategy. Use when researching a model before benchmarking: reading HuggingFace model cards, estimating VRAM requirements, selecting GPU providers, and determining evaluation approach. Triggers on "model research", "investigate model", "model info", "VRAM estimate", "which provider", "model card".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Autonomous model validation and benchmarking. Investigates any ML model (LLM, image gen, TTS, time series, etc.), runs it on GPU cloud, evaluates quality and performance, and generates HTML reports. Use when user asks to verify, benchmark, evaluate, or test a model. Triggers on "verify model", "benchmark", "evaluate model", "test model", "run benchmark", "model evaluation", "モデルを検証", "ベンチマーク", "モデルを試して".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Orchestrates an end-to-end long-read structural-variant pipeline - basecalling to minimap2 alignment (platform-matched preset) to Sniffles2/cuteSV/pbsv calling to optional assembly-based calling (dipcall/PAV) to two-step .snf cohort merging to Truvari benchmarking - chaining ONT and PacBio HiFi runs while handing the SV signal mechanism off to the component skills. Use when running a long-read SV workflow from reads to a benchmarked callset, choosing the minimap2 preset and SV caller by platform and goal, deciding when long reads are worth it for the insertions and repeat-mediated SVs short reads physically miss, building a joint-genotyped cohort with the two-step .snf design, or parameterizing a Truvari benchmark against GIAB HG002 Tier 1 plus CMRG. Not for the SV signal mechanism itself (see variant-calling/structural-variant-calling) or short-read SV.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build AI scientist systems with the ToolUniverse Python SDK for scientific research. Covers the 3 calling patterns (`tu.run` portable dict API, `tu.tools.X` function API, direct class instantiation), tool loading, batch execution, MCP server integration, and embedding-based tool search. Use for SDK programming, custom tool composition, benchmarking pipelines, and integrating ToolUniverse into research workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.