'bugs' 검색 결과

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive 4-phase debugging methodology for complex bugs. Use for bugs that aren't immediately obvious or have resisted quick fixes. Keywords: bug, error, fix, debug, broken, crash, fail, exception

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill provides systematic bug detection and discovery capabilities for VS Code extensions. Use when searching for hidden bugs, analyzing code for potential issues, investigating suspicious behavior, performing code audits, or proactively finding bugs before they manifest. Covers static analysis patterns, dynamic analysis techniques, code smell detection, and systematic codebase investigation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ALWAYS invoke this skill when delegating, planning, or managing any development task. Do not implement features, fix bugs, or start coding directly without first loading and following this orchestrator pipeline. Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, managing tasks, reviewing code, orchestrating work, or any task that needs structured delegation. Trigger on words like orchestrate, manage, implement, build, develop, organize, delegate, team lead, pipeline, or project manage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically find root causes and fix bugs. Use when debugging errors, investigating test failures, reproducing bugs from issue trackers (GitHub, Linear, Jira), or when stuck on a problem after failed fix attempts. Also use when the user says 'debug this', 'why is this failing', 'fix this bug', 'trace this error', or pastes stack traces, error messages, or issue references.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Autonomously fix bugs from any source — Slack threads, failing CI tests, docker logs, or a plain description. Use when you have a bug report or failing test and want Claude to investigate and fix without step-by-step guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI-powered codebase security scanner that reasons about code like a security researcher — tracing data flows, understanding component interactions, and catching vulnerabilities that pattern-matching tools miss. Use this skill when asked to scan code for security vulnerabilities, find bugs, check for SQL injection, XSS, command injection, exposed API keys, hardcoded secrets, insecure dependencies, access control issues, or any request like "is my code secure?", "review for security issues", "audit this codebase", or "check for vulnerabilities". Covers injection flaws, authentication and access control bugs, secrets exposure, weak cryptography, insecure dependencies, and business logic issues across JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, PHP, Go, Ruby, and Rust.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill for critical code review that focuses on whether the code actually works correctly and achieves the expected results - not just whether it matches a design document. This skill assumes designs can be wrong, finds bugs the design didn't anticipate, and verifies end-to-end correctness. Triggers include "critical code review", "deep code review", "verify this implementation works", "find bugs in this code", or reviewing implementation against requirements. NOTE - Security review is OUT OF SCOPE; use a dedicated security review skill for that purpose.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs, regressions, flaky failures, and performance problems with unclear cause. Use for root-cause debugging after a concrete symptom exists; do not use for routine implementation or speculative cleanup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review changes for bugs, regressions, missing tests, safety gaps, public/private leaks, and architecture drift before stylistic comments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI-powered codebase security scanner that reasons about code like a security researcher — tracing data flows, understanding component interactions, and catching vulnerabilities that pattern-matching tools miss. Use this skill when asked to scan code for security vulnerabilities, find bugs, check for SQL injection, XSS, command injection, exposed API keys, hardcoded secrets, insecure dependencies, access control issues, or any request like "is my code secure?", "review for security issues", "audit this codebase", or "check for vulnerabilities". Covers injection flaws, authentication and access control bugs, secrets exposure, weak cryptography, insecure dependencies, and business logic issues across JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, PHP, Go, Ruby, and Rust.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Exploratory QA — web apps, bugs, evidence, reports, systematic testing

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.