'engine' 검색 결과

Foundational platform engineering knowledge from key references -- Continuous Delivery, SRE, Accelerate, Team Topologies, Chaos Engineering, and Secure Delivery. Load when contextual grounding in platform engineering theory is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manages Milvus on Volcano Engine (Volcengine): provision/inspect/scale/delete clusters and run collection + CRUD/search operations via bundled CLIs. Use when the user mentions Milvus + Volcengine/Volcano Engine or asks to operate Milvus there.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Score a website's AI answer-engine visibility 0–100 against the open AIV rubric, and, with the user's own API keys, check and track through the OpenAI, Perplexity, Gemini and Anthropic APIs whether AI engines actually cite it. Use when the user wants to know whether AI engines can find, parse, trust and cite their site, or whether they do. Triggers on: 'does ChatGPT cite us', 'AI citation rate', 'share of voice in AI answers', 'track AI visibility weekly', 'AIV', 'AI visibility', 'GEO audit', 'generative engine optimization', 'AEO', 'llms.txt', 'will AI cite my site', 'AI search ranking', 'get cited by ChatGPT'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ai-engineer workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a game task could run on more than one engine or the repository has no engine yet - read the repo's engine and pinned version, and only for a brand-new game pick one from platforms, 2D/3D, team language, scale and licensing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

SEO, AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), and GEO strategy for search engines and AI visibility. Use when working on "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "on-page SEO," "AI search optimization," "AEO," "GEO," "AI visibility," "optimize for ChatGPT," "optimize for Perplexity," "AI Overviews," "answer engine optimization," "generative engine optimization," "AI citations," "featured snippets," "meta tags," "schema markup," "search ranking," "content optimization," "E-E-A-T," "structured data," "search console," "SEO health check," "why am I not ranking," "AI search readiness," "backlink strategy," "link building," "domain authority," "programmatic SEO," "SEO at scale," "template-based SEO," "AEO monitoring," "AI search monitoring," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "SERP analysis," "search intent," "site architecture," "information architecture," "URL structure," "internal linking," or "navigation." For keyword research, see keyword-research-and-clustering.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Configure the project's game engine and version. Pins the engine in AGENTS.md, detects knowledge gaps, and populates engine reference docs via webfetch when the version is beyond the LLM's training data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply evidence-first engineering discipline to any agent-built software project: fact discovery before action, evidence-calibrated status reporting, explicit change boundaries and stage gates, controlled confirmation for risky or external actions, sensitive-information redaction for anything shared publicly, and resumable continuity after interruptions. Use when users ask an agent to take over an existing codebase, deliver a feature across stages, verify whether work is actually complete, judge release readiness, or keep conclusions honest about what is proven versus assumed. This foundation skill is domain-neutral; vertical suites (for example mini-program engineering) build on it by adding domain facts and platform rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Engineering ethics covering safety, professional codes of conduct, public welfare responsibility, whistleblowing, case studies (Challenger, Columbia, Hyatt Regency, Bhopal, Therac-25), and the ethical dimensions of design decisions. Includes the NSPE Code of Ethics, the iron ring tradition, risk communication, informed consent in engineering, and the duty to dissent. Use when analyzing ethical dimensions of engineering decisions, teaching professional responsibility, or reviewing designs for safety and public welfare.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Technical writing, engineering specifications, reports, presentations, and documentation standards for engineering practice. Covers document types (requirements documents, test reports, design rationale, operations manuals), writing style, data visualization, engineering drawing standards, and oral presentation techniques. Use when writing engineering documents, presenting technical results, creating specifications, or learning documentation best practices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reliability engineering for cloud systems — SLIs, SLOs, error budgets, SRE practices, runbooks, incident response, on-call rotation, blameless postmortems, chaos engineering, and the NASA Systems Engineering methodology (MCR/SRR/PDR/CDR/ORR phase gates, TAID verification, requirements tracing) adapted to cloud operations. Use when establishing SLOs for a new service, running an incident, writing a runbook, preparing a launch readiness review, or bringing NASA SE discipline to cloud deployments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze and engineer protein glycosylation. Scan sequences for canonical N-glycosylation sequons (N-X-S/T with X not proline, including overlapping sites), predict O-GalNAc hotspots, read glycan notation, and reach the curated external tooling (NetNGlyc, NetOGlyc, GlycoShield, GlycoWorkbench, GlyTouCan, GlyConnect). Use this skill for therapeutic antibody glycoengineering and afucosylation for ADCC, Fc glycan control, glycan shielding in vaccine immunogen design, sequon removal or insertion, and half-life engineering through sialylation. Also trigger on N-glycosylation, sequon, NXS/NXT, O-glycosylation, glycoform heterogeneity, afucosylation, high-mannose, GlyTouCan, or WURCS.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Deploy a self-hosted SearXNG meta search engine via Docker Compose. Covers settings.yml configuration, engine selection, result proxying, Nginx frontend, persistence, and updates. Use when setting up a private search engine without tracking, aggregating results from multiple providers, running a shared search instance for a team or organisation, or replacing reliance on a single search provider.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Select an OCR/HTR engine by benchmarking candidates on the same labelled samples — source ground truth from open datasets (e.g. Hugging Face PAGE-XML corpora) or hand-transcription, wrap every engine behind a transcribe(image_path) -> str adapter (vision-LLMs via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, dedicated HTR REST APIs, cloud OCR), and score with zero-dependency raw CER, lenient CER, WER, and a critical name/date token diff. Use when choosing an engine for handwriting or historical-document transcription, when published accuracy claims need honest verification on your own material, or when a records workflow must surface confident-but-wrong names and dates that a low aggregate CER hides.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reverse engineers malware binaries using NSA's Ghidra disassembler and decompiler to understand internal logic, cryptographic routines, C2 protocols, and evasion techniques at the assembly and pseudo-C level. Activates for requests involving malware reverse engineering, disassembly analysis, decompilation, binary analysis, or understanding malware internals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan and execute authorized phishing and social engineering campaigns for red team engagements. Use this skill when conducting simulated social engineering attacks including email phishing, spear phishing, vishing, pretexting, and credential harvesting. Covers GoPhish setup, pretext development, payload delivery, and measuring human vulnerability. Requires explicit written authorization before any testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Query, recommend, and switch the Pulp JS engine backend (QuickJS, JavaScriptCore, V8). Handles "which JS engine", "switch to V8", "engine for Three.js".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a biomedical/bioengineering engineer — running a design control phase (inputs, outputs, verification, validation) for a medical device, scoring a Design FMEA and deciding whether a failure mode needs mitigation, planning a human factors/usability validation study, building a design traceability matrix, or writing a design verification or risk-mitigation report. Distinct from a regulatory-affairs-specialist (owns the submission/clearance process, not the engineering itself) and from a clinical-data-manager/biostatistician (trial data and analysis, not device design).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologist/Technician — verifying an installed fastener's preload against a drawing's torque callout via the T=K·D·F relationship, reducing strain-gauge data from a structural proof-load test into stress and checking it against an FEA-predicted margin, selecting and executing an NDI method against a defect type and material, reducing a wind-tunnel test point's dynamic-pressure and Reynolds-number data, or ballooning and dispositioning an AS9102 first article inspection. Distinct from an aerospace-engineer (owns the design, structural analysis, and certification basis) — this role builds, instruments, tests, and inspects the hardware the engineer specified, closing the loop with measurement rather than deriving a new analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.