220건 · 관련도순
Evaluate a local skill with the terum-skills CLI — hygiene, trigger evals and execution cases against a baseline, billed to the user's own Claude Code — after confirming the cost, and show the result as a Markdown board. Use when the user asks to eval, test, score or benchmark a skill, or to see whether an edit made it better.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when validating, benchmarking, or monitoring LLM application performance. Keywords: RAG evaluation, LLM-as-a-judge, CI/CD gating, trajectory scoring, test suites, prompt quality.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and build LLM agents: ReAct loops, tool schemas, planning, memory, guardrails, evals, and human-in-the-loop. Use when building autonomous multi-step AI systems.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Ship AI features to production — model selection, evals, latency/cost optimization, guardrails, monitoring, and iteration loops. Use when turning an LLM prototype into a reliable product feature.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Specification frameworks for features that call a model — approach tier, model pinning, output contracts, budgets, failure modes and eval design. Load when a spec touches model calls, prompts, retrieval, tool calling, agent loops or evals.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Testing and evaluation framework for LLM prompts and applications -- promptfooconfig.yaml, assertions, model-graded evals, red teaming, CI/CD integration, custom providers, and comparative evaluation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when designing, generating an MVP blueprint for, auditing, troubleshooting, refactoring, or explaining an agentic harness for any domain. Covers provider-neutral agent architecture for OpenAI, Anthropic, and OpenAI-compatible APIs: agent loops, tool design, record provenance, interactive presentation, user-memory lifecycles, environment-adaptive tools, speculative tool execution, late-bound capabilities, permissions, system prompts, planning, goals, always-on agents and durable runtime, adaptive agent teams, context compaction, memory, skills, MCP/external connectors, public-board communications, realtime voice agents, hardware agents and board deployment, self-refining recursive harnesses, programmable context, continual refinement, observability, evals, prompt caching, agent-legible environments, feedback loops, and safety.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Patterns for continuous autonomous agent loops with quality gates, evals, and recovery controls.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Scientific model and eval tuning loop for prompt/skill/system-prompt changes, model configuration, runtime options, and local/Ollama model sizing or environment variables. Use when tuning eval performance, comparing local or remote models, improving tool-use behavior, reducing timeouts/loops, or deciding whether an eval optimization is worth keeping.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
[Code Quality] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for AI code or plan review: LLM calls, prompts, agents, RAG, evals and guardrails. --mode={code|plan}; --report-only is read-only.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Post-train LLMs with PrimeIntellect's prime-rl (async RL, SFT, distillation, evals). Use this skill whenever the user mentions prime-rl, wants to write an rl.toml or sft.toml, run `uv run rl` / `uv run sft` / `uv run eval` / `uv run inference`, pick GRPO, MaxRL, OPD or ECHO, tune IPO loss, or monitor and resume a run. Also trigger for verifiers environments, Prime Intellect post-training, reverse-text, and pydantic-config TOML overrides.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Brutally honest AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md review backed by real A/B test evidence. Not just opinions — actual proof that your rules are dead weight. Roasts instruction files for bloat, slop, and redundancy, then proves it by running evals. Use when user says "roast my agents.md", "roast my CLAUDE.md", "prove my rules are useless", "eval roast", or wants entertaining evidence-based feedback on their AI config files. Also triggers on "audit my instructions" or "are my rules helping".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.