'hunter' 검색 결과

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US cybersecurity firms — pen-testing/red team, security audits, vCISO, SOC 2 readiness, incident response, managed SOC, IAM, cloud security, and AppSec. Triggers on "find me a pen-testing firm for our SOC 2 audit", "shortlist three vCISO services for our healthcare-tech startup", "we need an incident response retainer", or "pull contact info for these 8 security firm domains", even when described indirectly (we got breached, prepare us for the compliance audit, get us SOC 2 ready). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house security hires, "how do I patch CVE-X" or "configure firewall Y" DIY questions, security-product reviews (CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne, etc.), generic security knowledge questions, consumer/personal security advice, non-US firms, individual freelancers and bug-bounty hunters.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Spawn the comment hunter, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

实战 SRC / 众测 / Bug bounty 漏洞挖掘工作流 skill。包含：5 阶段方法论（intake → recon → enum → hunt → report）、19 个攻击类 playbook（SQLi/XSS/RCE/SSRF/IDOR/CSRF/Path Traversal/File Upload/SSTI/XXE/Race/HTTP Smuggling/OAuth/JWT/SAML/GraphQL/Mobile/LLM/DoS）、305 个结构化 payload、263 个 WAF/EDR 绕过变体、2887 份 HackerOne 真实 High/Critical 已披露案例、77,000+ WooYun 案例统计、国产 OA / 中间件指纹库、银行 / 电信行业垂直 playbook。当用户提到 "src 挖洞 / src 漏洞挖掘 / bug bounty / 众测 / hackerone / 漏洞赏金 / SRC / 任意 X 漏洞 / 渗透测试" 或问"如何挖某个目标 / 怎么测某个 API / 如何绕过 WAF" 时触发。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

OSINT and reconnaissance automation skill for passive collection, pivoting, deduplication, and graph-based analysis using subfinder, amass, dnsx, chaos, crt.sh, github-dorks, waybackurls, gau, gitleaks, trufflehog, theHarvester, h8mail, holehe, sherlock, Shodan, Censys, FOFA, and Hunter. Use for asset discovery, exposure monitoring, and authorized reconnaissance only.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run an effective bug bounty program — scope design, triage, researcher relations, and remediation workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build production-grade Claude Code CLI skills with fallback architecture, TypeScript implementation, and creativity directives. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166 — "Building Claude Skills as a Bug Bounty Hunter."

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Configure Claude as a "Pair Hunter" — autonomous overnight hacking, context management via per-target .claudemd files, sub-agent compaction avoidance, and scope enforcement. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill provides systematic bug detection and discovery capabilities for VS Code extensions. Use when searching for hidden bugs, analyzing code for potential issues, investigating suspicious behavior, performing code audits, or proactively finding bugs before they manifest. Covers static analysis patterns, dynamic analysis techniques, code smell detection, and systematic codebase investigation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes position-independent shellcode: disassembling raw bytes at the right architecture, recognizing PEB-walk API resolution and egg hunters, and emulating execution to recover behavior and payloads. Activates for requests to analyze shellcode, disassemble raw position-independent code, or emulate a shellcode blob.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

法国法领域的法律助理专家。法律研究、法律咨询、法律文书起草、反论证、合同与文件分析、法律动态跟踪、参考文献核验与统一。生成 Word 文档（computer use）或结构化的对话式答复。MCP：OpenLegi、Themia、LegalDataHunter。任何法律问题、任何法国法概念（合同、责任、判例、民法典、法院、损害赔偿）、任何关于欧盟法、欧洲法院（CJUE）或欧洲人权法院（CEDH）的问题，以及任何法国法律参考文献核验或统一的请求，均触发本技能。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect horizontal gene transfer (HGT / LGT) using compositional methods (GC%, codon usage, tetranucleotide z-scores via SIGI-HMM, AlienHunter, IslandViewer 4, IslandPath-DIMOB), phylogenetic-incongruence methods (AvP, HGTphyloDetect, ALE / GeneRax / AleRax reconciliation, RANGER-DTL), and BLAST-distribution methods (HGTector v2, DarkHorse, Alien Index). Use when screening prokaryote genomes for genomic islands and HGT events, distinguishing HGT from incomplete lineage sorting / differential gene loss / hybridization, mapping donor lineages via phylogenetic placement, separating eukaryotic HGT from contamination, ruling out gBGC as a false signal, or quantifying DTL rates with ALE/GeneRax on bacterial trees.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Offload builds, tests, or artifact verification to authorized SSH hosts and isolated worktrees; synchronize remote fixes into dedicated coordinator commits and preserve reproducible build provenance. Use for spare development capacity and remote build troubleshooting. Paid provisioning requires a separate resource lifecycle contract.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scientific model and eval tuning loop for prompt/skill/system-prompt changes, model configuration, runtime options, and local/Ollama model sizing or environment variables. Use when tuning eval performance, comparing local or remote models, improving tool-use behavior, reducing timeouts/loops, or deciding whether an eval optimization is worth keeping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigate anonymous or stealth model identities by correlating model availability with provider outages and OpenRouter or Vercel AI Gateway incident reports. Use for stealth-model attribution or maintaining an outage evidence ledger.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Passive code-review lane for authorized repositories, local checkouts, uploaded source archives, and diffs. Use when the security research agent needs deterministic candidate discovery before expensive AI investigation, scoped PR-style review, append-only evidence records, or independent revalidation of code findings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Select established CTF and security-research tools for authorized artifact triage, web inspection, reversing, crypto, forensics, networking, and exploit validation. Use when a user provides a CTF-style tool catalog, asks which tools to use, or needs safe usage instructions for common offensive/security tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan and use user-consented local camera and microphone observations for an explicitly authorized physical target. Use when a capture can establish a bounded physical-state observation such as whether a test fixture changed state, an instrument reading changed, or equipment noise changed relatively.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a specific vulnerability, patch, CVE, Version Diff, or Changelog Claim into a proactive security exploration plan. Use when the user wants research angles, lateral target discovery, patch/CVE strategy, new surface discovery, or hypothesis generation from vulnerability intelligence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze suspicious SMS/email messages, phishing links, redirects, domains, payloads, malware indicators, and suspected C2 infrastructure safely. Use when the user provides spam, smishing/phishing content, raw .eml headers, URLs, QR links, attachments, hashes, strange payloads, redirect chains, DNS/WHOIS/RDAP questions, C2 clues, exploit-chain questions, or asks what defenses to apply.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generalize published Spectre and remote microarchitectural research into passive target prerequisites, defensive review, and approval-gated local validation. Use for shared runtimes, JavaScript isolates, edge workers, serverless platforms, browser sandboxes, remote timing, cache side channels, speculative type confusion, or Dynamic Process Isolation analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use common CLI, Kali, and shell tools to inspect web Targets, captured assets, logs, HAR/PCAP files, packages, and generated artifacts, then turn observations into Evidence, Security Signals, and ranked Hypotheses. Use when the user asks for web bug-hunting inspection, digital records, URL maps, crawling, endpoint discovery, JS bundle/package analysis, light forensics, or command-line investigation workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run independent, task-matched expert attempts, select a base, and synthesize the strongest result.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.