1.2만건 · 관련도순
Turn raw test results into readable reports with pass and fail totals, unstable tests, and coverage, meaning how much code tests exercise. Package results for releases, quality assurance, or reviews, with follow-up actions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Add unit and end-to-end browser tests to a completed development phase using its acceptance criteria, planning documents, and implementation. Review the proposed coverage, verify tests fail and then pass, and commit the generated test files.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Diagnostic-only test suite auditor. Classifies repo type, maps against 7-layer testing taxonomy (git hooks → static → unit → integration → system → E2E → acceptance), runs deterministic quality gates (coverage, mutation, CRAP, architecture, escape-scan), builds RTM / personas / journeys traceability, produces TEST_AUDIT.md, updates tests/TESTING.md, and mandatorily hands off to implement-tests when gaps are found. Use when auditing test quality, finding test gaps, or running the full 7-layer sweep. Trigger with "audit tests", "find gaps", "test audit", "check test quality", "full sweep", "7-layer audit", "rtm check".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate and structure MATLAB unit tests using matlab.unittest and matlab.uitest features, including class-based tests, parameterized testing, fixtures, mocking, and app testing with gestures. Use when writing, generating, or adding tests, creating test classes, adding test methods, parameterizing tests, setting up fixtures, mocking dependencies, or testing App Designer apps. Do NOT use for running tests, collecting coverage, or CI/CD configuration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "dev-webtest-plan", "Webテスト計画を生成", "テスト計画を作成", "webtest plan", "E2Eテスト計画", "画面テスト計画", "generate webtest plan", "create test plan from requirements", "webtest計画を更新", "テスト計画の差分更新", "update webtest plan", "画面仕様からテスト更新". dev-planの出力からPlaywright用のWebテスト計画ファイルを自動生成する。画面仕様の変更差分からテスト計画を更新する差分更新モードも対応。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use NUnit. Use when a repo uses `NUnit`, `[Test]`, `[TestCase]`, `[TestFixture]`, or NUnit3TestAdapter for VSTest or Microsoft.Testing.Platform execution. USE FOR: writing or reviewing NUnit tests; using [Test], [TestCase], [TestFixture], [SetUp], [TearDown] attributes; configuring NUnit3TestAdapter or NUnit.Analyzers. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Micronaut applications — @acceptance scenarios, @MicronautTest, HttpClient, BaseAcceptanceTest with TestPropertyProvider for Testcontainers and WireMock, *AT suffix, Failsafe. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Micronaut acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Micronaut; Map Gherkin scenario facts to Micronaut acceptance tests; Stub external HTTP services in Micronaut acceptance tests; Configure Failsafe acceptance test naming for Micronaut. Part of Plinth Toolkit
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you need to review, improve, or write Java unit tests — including migrating from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5, adopting AssertJ for fluent assertions, structuring tests with Given-When-Then, ensuring test independence, applying parameterized tests, mocking dependencies with Mockito, verifying boundary conditions (RIGHT-BICEP, CORRECT, A-TRIP), leveraging JSpecify null-safety annotations, or eliminating testing anti-patterns such as reflection-based tests or shared mutable state. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for unit tests; Apply best practices for unit tests in Java code; Write fast JUnit unit tests for Java code; Improve Mockito-based Java unit tests; Refactor Java tests to isolate collaborators. Part of Plinth Toolkit
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than $smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute multi-level exploratory testing of the app covering basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios, plus usability observations through a UX lens reported separately from defects. Deeper than /smoke-test. Use when the user asks to "exploratory test", "test thoroughly", "test all scenarios", "deep test", "test edge cases", "test everything", "break it", "find bugs by testing", "test usability", or "check the UX while testing".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs repeatable and bounded (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build a single sprint or release test plan. Covers feature decomposition into testable scenarios, requirements-to-test coverage mapping, effort estimation by test type, prioritization matrices (risk × effort), resource allocation, and scheduling with buffers. Use when: "sprint test plan," "release test plan," "what to test this sprint," "test estimation," "coverage mapping." Not for: multi-quarter strategy — use `test-strategy`. Not for: ranking areas by risk — use `risk-based-testing`. Not for: the go/no-go decision itself — use `release-readiness`. Related: test-strategy, risk-based-testing, release-readiness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Define test cases BEFORE implementation, ensuring every API, business rule, and user journey has verifiable acceptance criteria during PRD v0.7 Build Execution. Triggers on requests to define tests, plan test coverage, create test cases, or when user asks "define tests", "test planning", "what to test?", "test cases", "test coverage", "TEST-", "test-first". Consumes EPIC- (scope), API-, DBT-, BR-, UJ-. Outputs TEST- entries with Given-When-Then format. Feeds v0.7 Implementation Loop.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Map testable surfaces, audit existing tests for quality, and write test specifications that prevent AI shortcuts. Use when asked to "audit tests", "specify tests", "test architect", "map test coverage", or invoke /test-architect. Two modes — audit (evaluate existing tests against Beck's principles) and specify (write test specs for new code). Powered by Carmack × Beck quality-testing.md reference doc. Stack: Next.js App Router / TypeScript / Vitest / Cypress / tRPC / Prisma / Neon.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Testing Vue 3 SPAs: Vitest + @vue/test-utils, RTL-style alternatives, Pinia testing via createTestingPinia, composable testing, msw for network mocks, Cypress component testing, Playwright e2e. Use this skill to: - Set up Vitest for Vue 3 with jsdom + @vue/test-utils. - Pick mount vs shallowMount. - Test components by props/emits/slots contract. - Mock Pinia stores in tests. - Test composables in isolation. - Set up Playwright or Cypress for end-to-end. Do NOT use this skill for: - General Vue conventions (see vue-conventions). - State patterns (see vue-state-management). - Form-specific patterns (see vue-forms).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
JUnit 5, Mockito, AssertJ, and Testcontainers patterns for any JVM project. Covers test structure, parameterised tests, mocking discipline, fluent assertions, and integration testing with real containers. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every Java plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write clear, maintainable unit tests with JUnit 5. - Mock dependencies with Mockito without overusing mocks. - Write expressive assertions with AssertJ. - Spin up real infrastructure (DBs, message brokers) with Testcontainers for integration tests. Do NOT use this skill for: - Spring-specific test slices (@SpringBootTest, @WebMvcTest, @DataJpaTest — those are in spring-boot-plugin skills). - Framework-specific mocking utilities (MockMvc, WebTestClient).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates EditMode and PlayMode tests using NUnit, mapped from GDD Gherkin scenarios. Use when writing tests, validating features, ensuring code quality, or verifying behavior after changes. Triggers on requests like "write tests for this", "test the health system", "add unit tests", "verify this works", "add PlayMode tests", "test this feature", "write integration tests", "make sure this doesn't break", "add test coverage", "TDD this feature", or any task involving test creation, test-driven development, or quality assurance. Maps Given/When/Then scenarios directly to test methods using NUnit assertions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run and document QA test execution cycles - smoke tests, regression suites, exploratory testing sessions, and release readiness checklists. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer needs to structure or report on active testing work. Trigger on phrases like "run smoke tests", "start a regression cycle", "exploratory testing session", "test this build", "release checklist", "is this build stable", "log test results", "what passed and what failed", "document my testing", "create a test run report", or any request to execute and record test outcomes. Also trigger when someone says "we need to test before release" or "can you help me track what I've tested".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when writing acceptance criteria for Salesforce features, structuring UAT test scripts from user stories, classifying defects found during UAT, or planning regression testing before a Salesforce release. Trigger keywords: UAT, user acceptance testing, test script, acceptance criteria, defect classification, regression testing, test plan, test case. NOT for Given/When/Then AC syntax — use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then. NOT for the per-case field schema and AC-to-case decomposition — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for automated Flow or Apex test coverage — use flow/flow-testing. Also covers: UAT plan record, sandbox selection for UAT, pre-UAT environment checklist, sandbox email deliverability for testers, test-user personas, negative and bulk coverage, defect triage categories, go/no-go sign-off, quick-deploy window.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Test UI components the way users interact with them using Testing Library — query by role, text, and label instead of implementation details. Use when someone asks to "test React components", "Testing Library", "user-centric testing", "test accessibility", "test without implementation details", or "render and query components in tests". Covers React Testing Library, queries, user events, async testing, and accessibility assertions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Auto-activate for test_*.py, conftest.py, litestar.testing, TestClient, AsyncTestClient, create_test_client, create_async_test_client, anyio, Guard mocks, or DI overrides. Not for generic pytest.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
ISTQB/JSTQB のテスト分析（test analysis）活動を支援するスキル。テストベース（仕様・設計・コード・リスク）を分析して「何をテストすべきか」= テスト条件（test condition）を識別し、test-plan のプロダクトリスク評価があればそれを入力に優先度を付けた test-analysis.md を作る。「何をテストすべきか洗い出して」「テスト条件を整理して」「テスト観点を出して」「テスト分析して」と依頼されたときに使う。テストケースの導出（test-design）は対象外。単発のテスト作成依頼（単にユニットテストを書きたいだけ）も対象外。/test-analyze <テスト対象名> で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.