'does' 검색 결과

The perception-by-culture lens for psycho-logic — establish HOW a specific region, country, or subculture reads a signal before you send it, because perception is culturally coded and the same move can mean the opposite elsewhere. Use when adapting a product, price, message, or campaign to a new market; when the user asks 'will this work in [country/region]', 'why does this land in X but flop in Y', 'how do people here perceive Z', 'how do we localise/differentiate by region', or is about to copy a US/global playbook into another market. Covers the cultural dimensions that move Sutherland's levers — uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, status/power distance, high- vs low-context communication, mental-accounting norms, trust locus, and taboo/sacredness — and how each rewires reframing, costly-signaling, and experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with market-recon for live local data. 日本語・中文の相談（「この地域で通用する？」「适合本地市场吗？」）にも使う。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Research a specific company before applying or interviewing by gathering facts from primary and official sources, recording the source and date behind every claim, and keeping anonymous or unverifiable material clearly separated from confirmed fact. Use when a user asks what a company actually does, how it makes money, what its published conditions are, whether a posting matches the company's own disclosures, or what to verify before an interview; do not use to predict hiring outcomes, to repeat review-site content as fact, or to bulk-crawl sites that prohibit automated access.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read a Japanese job posting closely and report what it actually states: base pay separated from fixed overtime allowance, the range converted to an hourly basis, required versus preferred requirements, and the terms left ambiguous. Use when a user wants a 求人票 or job description examined before applying, wants two postings compared on the same basis, or wants questions prepared about pay and working conditions; do not use to judge whether the user will be hired, to infer duties the posting does not state, or to evaluate the employer's reputation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Explore possible next roles from a user's actual tasks, interests, and constraints, including adjacent roles and changes within their current workplace. Build evidence-linked career hypotheses, identify unknown duties and requirements, and propose small ways to test them. Use when someone does not know what work to pursue or asks what they could do beyond their current job; do not diagnose aptitude, rank careers, or predict salary or hiring success.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Routes memory and retrieval tasks between MemPalace and QMD. Use this skill whenever the user asks WHERE something is in the codebase (route to QMD), WHY something was built a certain way or what was decided (route to MemPalace), or needs BOTH code and historical context (combined). Trigger on phrases like: 'where is X', 'find X in the code', 'search the codebase for X', 'what did we decide about X', 'why does X work this way', 'show me X and why we built it', 'look up X', 'what's in the handoffs about X', 'pull the relevant files for X'. Use proactively whenever a question could benefit from codebase search OR project memory — don't wait for the user to explicitly ask for a search.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a bank, control account or subledger reconciliation does not agree: tracing each break from the reconciliation row back to the originating ledger entry and source record, stating the cause in one sentence and listing the evidence, owner and next action for review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Infer or annotate TCR antigen specificity by unsupervised clustering (TCRdist/tcrdist3, GLIPH2, clusTCR, GIANA) and database lookup (VDJdb, IEDB, McPAS-TCR), and rank candidates with supervised predictors (ERGO-II, NetTCR-2.x, pMTnet) under explicit caveats. Encodes the central truth that general TCR-epitope prediction for UNSEEN epitopes essentially does not work (collapses to near-random; IMMREP22, Grazioli 2022) because labeled data is dominated by a few immunodominant epitopes and there is no true negative set — so clustering for discovery is the honest task and de-novo binding needs wet-lab validation. Use when annotating TCR specificity or grouping a repertoire. Epitope/MHC context lives in mhc-binding-prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identifies differential m6A methylation between conditions from MeRIP-seq paired IP/input data using exomePeak2 with `bam_ip` + `bam_input` (control arm) and `bam_treated_ip` + `bam_treated_input` (treatment arm) for integrated GC-bias-aware differential calling (Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), QNB beta-binomial test (Liu 2017 *BMC Bioinformatics* 18:387), MeTDiff HMM-based differential bundled with MeTPeak, RADAR (Zhang 2019 *Genome Biol* 20:294) with its `filterBins -> diffIP -> reportResult` workflow, and the defensible paired-symmetric case of edgeR / DESeq2 on featureCounts-on-peaks matrices when batch / lot covariates need explicit fixed-effect handling (exomePeak2's top-level API does NOT accept arbitrary covariates). Covers paired vs unpaired vs interaction designs, batch confounding (antibody lot, RNA prep, sequencing run) and the per-lot meta-analysis strategy when exomePeak2 is the primary caller, the stoichiometry-vs-expression-vs-IP-efficiency confound that all MeRIP differential methods inherit, normalisation choice (size factor on IP, on input, on per-sample IP/input ratio), the McIntyre 2020 reproducibility caveat, effect-size filtering as a guardrail against under-powered N=2 designs, and orthogonal-validation routes for absolute stoichiometry (GLORI / SAC-seq / m6Anet `mod_ratio`). Use when comparing m6A levels across two or more conditions, choosing between exomePeak2 / QNB / RADAR / MeTDiff for a given design, handling batch confounding when exomePeak2's API is too rigid, normalising against input properly, distinguishing real hyper- / hypo-methylation from expression-level shifts, applying effect-size thresholds, interpreting volcano plots of differential peaks, or planning a follow-up orthogonal stoichiometry validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read this skill before the first step that uses the built-in browser, the browser pane inside the Claude desktop app (also called the in-app browser, the browser pane, Claude's browser, or "your own browser"), whose tools are named mcp__Claude_Browser__* when the session runs in the desktop app and mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser__* when a cloud session is linked to the person's computer; before those tools are turned on there may be a single enable__mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser tool instead. It covers the pane's persistent sign-ins, tabs and preview_start, reading pages as text, site approvals, what the pane cannot open, and what to do when it cannot be reached. It is not for Claude in Chrome (mcp__claude-in-chrome__* tools), which has its own skill, and it does not decide which browser to use.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read this skill before the first step that uses Claude in Chrome, the browser extension whose tools are named mcp__claude-in-chrome__* (also called Chrome, the browser extension, or the external browser) and which acts in the person's real Chrome with their own sign-ins; before those tools are turned on there may be a single enable__mcp__claude-in-chrome tool instead. It covers loading the tools in one ToolSearch call, checking the person's open tabs and working in a new tab, site permissions, GIF recordings, console logs, dialogs to avoid, and when to stop and ask. It is not for the built-in browser (mcp__Claude_Browser__* or mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser__* tools), which has its own skill, and it does not decide which browser to use.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

One sentence - what this skill does and when to invoke it

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

One sentence - what this skill does and when to invoke it

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Refresh the Key Metrics table in a thesis with current data from Financial Modeling Prep, with a Quartr standardized-statement tie-break for Revenue Growth / Gross Margin gaps (Step 4b-Q) and a scoped web-search fallback (Step 4b) when FMP has no data or resolved the wrong company. Use when user says "numbers", "refresh metrics", "update key metrics", or "refresh [TICKER]" with no other action implied. Surgical edit only — does NOT create research notes or propagate via /sync. Also flags (never auto-edits) stale price/valuation framing in the thesis Summary — see Step 10b.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract a thesis's load-bearing assumptions and scan for internal contradictions — the falsifiable claims the bull case requires, what would falsify each, and where the thesis's own Risks / Bear Case / research already argue against it. Use when user says "assumptions", "what must be true", "load-bearing assumptions", or "does [TICKER] contradict itself".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Map a thesis's position in its value chain — who it buys from, sells to, and competes with; where the bottleneck and pricing power sit; and whether it owns a critical layer. Use when user says "value chain", "supply chain position", "where does [TICKER] sit", or "who are [TICKER]'s suppliers/customers".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Refresh the Key Metrics table in a thesis with current data from Financial Modeling Prep, with a scoped web-search fallback (Step 4b) when FMP has no data or resolved the wrong company. Use when user says "numbers", "refresh metrics", "update key metrics", or "refresh [TICKER]" with no other action implied. Surgical edit only — does NOT create research notes or propagate via $sync. Also flags (never auto-edits) stale price/valuation framing in the thesis Summary — see Step 10b.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract a thesis's dependency fingerprint — the external variables its bull case actually rests on (key customers, suppliers/inputs, technology transitions, macro drivers, single points of failure). Use when user says "dependency map", "what does [TICKER] depend on", "dependency fingerprint", or "map exposures for [TICKER]".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigate implementation failures using root-cause-first debugging. Use when an implementer is blocked, verification fails, or repeated remediation does not converge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when: User wants to extend Docker with custom tools, personalize the Docker environment, or set up user-specific Docker customization. Triggers: 'extend docker', 'docker-extend', 'add tools to docker', 'customize docker', 'add my tools to the container', 'personalize docker setup', 'docker user setup', 'install tools in docker'. Does: Interactively sets up Dockerfile.user and docker-compose.override.yml so users can add personal tools to their Docker environment without affecting maintainer files or committing user-specific config to git.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The PRIMARY development workflow for the Archon project (remote-coding-agent). Use this skill instead of any PRP skills when working on Archon code. Routes to 10 specialized cookbooks based on what the user is trying to do: RESEARCH — "how does the orchestrator work?", "where is session state defined?", "trace the workflow execution flow", "what is IWorkflowStore?" INVESTIGATE — "should we use Drizzle or Prisma?", "what's the best way to add WebSockets?", "can we migrate to Turso?", "how do other projects handle rate limiting?" PRD — "write a PRD for dark mode", "spec out the notification feature", "product requirements for webhook retry" PLAN — "plan the auth refactor", "design the caching layer", "create an implementation plan for #42" IMPLEMENT — "implement the plan", "execute .claude/archon/plans/auth.plan.md", "build the feature from the plan", "code this up" REVIEW — "review PR #123", "review my changes", "code review the diff" DEBUG — "debug the failing test", "why is streaming broken?", "root cause analysis on the timeout issue" COMMIT — "commit these changes", "commit the auth refactor" PR — "create a PR", "open a pull request for this branch" ISSUE — "report this to gh", "create a gh issue", "log it in github", "file a bug for this", "create a feature request" This skill triggers on ANY development task: researching, investigating, planning, building, reviewing, debugging, committing, or shipping code. NOT for: Running Archon CLI workflows in worktrees (use /archon instead).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to review a pull request, understand what a PR changes, assess risk of merging, or check for missing test coverage. Examples: "Review this PR", "What does PR #42 change?", "Is this PR safe to merge?"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.