'does' 검색 결과

YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT answer directly) when the user describes a new product idea, asks whether something is worth building, wants to think through design decisions for something that doesn't exist yet, or is exploring a concept before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review. (gstack)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Show ponytail's measured impact as a compact scoreboard: less code, less cost, more speed, from the benchmark medians. One-shot display, not a persistent mode, and not a per-repo number. Trigger: /ponytail-gain, "ponytail gain", "what does ponytail save", "show ponytail impact", "ponytail scoreboard".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Elite mobile app image-generation skill for creating premium, app-native screen concepts and flows. Designed for iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile products. Prioritizes clean hierarchy, comfortably readable text, strong multi-screen consistency, controlled color palettes, non-generic creative direction, textured surfaces, image-led composition, tasteful custom iconography, and clean phone mockup framing. By default, screens should be shown inside a subtle premium iPhone or similar phone mockup with a visible frame, while the main focus stays on the app content itself. This skill generates images only. It does not write code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrator for the pre-decision business-idea lifecycle — generate ideas, model them, evaluate them, validate them with customers, and only then hand off to product-soul / brainstorming. Routes through `idea-generation`, `business-modeling`, `idea-evaluation`, and `customer-discovery`. Load when the user asks to explore business ideas, find a startup idea, evaluate a venture, validate an idea, says "what business should I start", "should I build this", "is this a good business", "I have a startup idea", "evaluate this venture", "model this business", "validate this idea", "Mom Test this", "Lean Canvas this", "Business Model Canvas", "Value Proposition Canvas", "go/no-go on this idea". Pre-decision suite — once one idea is committed, hands off to `product-soul`. Does NOT design features (use `brainstorming`) or audit built products (use `reality-check`).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pick an icon strategy and produce a coherent icon set that doesn't look mass-produced. Solves the "Lucide everywhere" problem — every AI-generated UI uses the same 24px stroke-1.5 outline icons, which is the second-biggest vibecoded tell after Inter-on-purple-gradient. Generates custom SVG sets, tunes existing icon libraries to match archetype + typography, defines stroke weight, optical sizing, and corner-radius rules. Load when the user asks to pick icons, design an icon set, customize Lucide / Phosphor / Heroicons, generate SVG icons, make icons feel custom, says "the icons look generic", "design a custom icon system", "icons for this product", or when frontend-design routes here during icon craft. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Content sanitization and hidden-content detection for agent skill security. Scans markdown, HTML, and text for visually hidden but agent-readable attacks: CSS-hidden text (display:none, color:white, font-size:0, opacity:0), HTML comments with instructions, collapsible details sections, zero-width unicode, homoglyphs, misleading links, and inline HTML in markdown. Enforces mandatory sanitization before external content enters agent context. Load as part of the secure-* sequence during any repo scan or skill audit. Also load for sanitize content, check hidden text, scan markdown attacks, strip HTML, detect invisible instructions, check zero-width chars. Core principle: visibility does not equal influence — hidden content is more dangerous than visible content because agents process it but humans cannot see it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Author pull requests with intent-separated commits, blast-radius disclosure, and verification evidence. Load when opening a PR, writing a PR description, separating refactor from feature commits, or summarizing a change set for review. Also triggers on "write the PR", "PR body", "intent-separated commits", "split refactor from feature", "pr summary", or after safe-change cycles complete. Extends git-workflow-and-versioning — does not replace it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate 5–10 business idea candidates from a blank page or a founder's domain context — using pain mining, jobs-to-be-done, trend × capability mapping, constraint relaxation, adjacency search, and founder-market-fit prompts. Each candidate is a structured idea card (segment, JTBD, current alternative, why-now, distribution wedge, monetisation, "feels like"). Load when the user asks to generate business ideas, brainstorm startup ideas, find ideas to work on, says "what business should I start", "give me startup ideas", "I don't know what to build", "ideate ventures", "blank-page idea generation", "find me a startup idea", "explore business opportunities". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "Uber for X" / "AI for X" with no specific JTBD, "everyone" segments, and idea cards missing any of the 7 required fields. Does NOT design or evaluate ideas generated — for that use `idea-evaluation`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decompose tasks into structured, outcome-defined process entries with complexity triage. Load when user says "decompose this", "break this down", "what steps do I need", "plan this out", "what's the process for", "how do I approach this", or when any complex task needs structured execution planning. Includes a problem-understanding pass before complexity triage. Routes to `problem-to-plan` when the user needs planning deliverables (spec + plan + TODO). Does NOT replace brainstorming — brainstorming is design approval (upstream), this is execution planning (downstream).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Research a skill domain before building or improving a skill. Searches academic papers, practitioner blogs, and GitHub skill repos in parallel to find current best practices, domain gotchas, and existing skill patterns. Called by universal-skill-creator and improve-skills before writing any skill. Also load directly when the user asks to research a domain for a skill, find existing skills on a topic, discover best practices for a skill, check what research exists before building an agent skill, or says "what does current research say about", "find best practices for".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pick the right business-model canvas (Lean Canvas, Business Model Canvas, or Value Proposition Canvas) for the stage and fill it with specifics — one segment, one primary canvas, top-3 assumptions, no fluff in the moat or channel boxes. Load when the user asks to fill a business model canvas, lean canvas, value proposition canvas, model this business, map the business model, says "fill the BMC", "make a Lean Canvas", "Value Proposition Canvas for this", "model this idea", "what's the business model", "design the business model". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "everyone" segments, generic channels ("SEO/social/content/ads"), and "unfair advantage = AI/data/network effects" with no concrete asset. Does NOT score viability — for that use `idea-evaluation`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Select alternative execution paths when a plan step fails — branch on outcomes instead of blind retry. Load when a structured plan step fails, an unexpected observation arrives, or the user asks what to try next after an error. Also triggers on "try another approach", "route around this failure", "replan on failure", "if X fails try Y", or outcome-based branching during multi-step work. Pairs with structured-planning and debug-and-fix. Does not replace root-cause debugging — adds plan-level path selection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Internal skill. Called by setup-evaluation after a PASS. Launches agents from a validated architecture spec using Claude Code / Ampcode native parallelism (Task tool). Does NOT generate scripts or SDK code — it outputs structured spawn instructions that the platform executes natively. Never invoked directly by the user. Never launches without a setup-evaluation PASS.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structure git work with atomic commits, conventional messages, short-lived branches, and pre-commit hygiene. Load when committing, branching, resolving merge conflicts, organizing parallel work, or reviewing git history. Also triggers on "git workflow", "commit message", "conventional commits", "atomic commit", "branch strategy", "git worktree", "how should I commit this". Does not replace project-specific hook policies — complements them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build and deploy applications when the user selects or invokes the Prisma plugin, including requests like "Build a simple Todo app and deploy it" that do not name a stack. Use Prisma Composer for new apps and Prisma Compute for deployment. Also use for explicit Composer/Compute requests, deployment diagnostics, and recovering Composer deployments. Does not cover unrelated ORM or database administration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verify a code change end-to-end in the current worktree: identify what changed, run the relevant tests, get the app running, drive a browser over the affected areas, and report a verdict with screenshots. Generic across project types (Laravel/Herd, Node/bun, frontend, CLI, library). Use when the user wants to verify/QA/smoke-test a change, check that a PR or branch works, validate uncommitted work, or says "/flow", "verify this change", "does this PR work", "test and click through this". Optional target: PR number/URL, branch/ref, or worktree path; default is the current working changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Infer or annotate TCR antigen specificity by unsupervised clustering (TCRdist/tcrdist3, GLIPH2, clusTCR, GIANA) and database lookup (VDJdb, IEDB, McPAS-TCR), and rank candidates with supervised predictors (ERGO-II, NetTCR-2.x, pMTnet) under explicit caveats. Encodes the central truth that general TCR-epitope prediction for UNSEEN epitopes essentially does not work (collapses to near-random; IMMREP22, Grazioli 2022) because labeled data is dominated by a few immunodominant epitopes and there is no true negative set — so clustering for discovery is the honest task and de-novo binding needs wet-lab validation. Use when annotating TCR specificity or grouping a repertoire. Epitope/MHC context lives in mhc-binding-prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identifies differential m6A methylation between conditions from MeRIP-seq paired IP/input data using exomePeak2 with `bam_ip` + `bam_input` (control arm) and `bam_treated_ip` + `bam_treated_input` (treatment arm) for integrated GC-bias-aware differential calling (Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), QNB beta-binomial test (Liu 2017 *BMC Bioinformatics* 18:387), MeTDiff HMM-based differential bundled with MeTPeak, RADAR (Zhang 2019 *Genome Biol* 20:294) with its `filterBins -> diffIP -> reportResult` workflow, and the defensible paired-symmetric case of edgeR / DESeq2 on featureCounts-on-peaks matrices when batch / lot covariates need explicit fixed-effect handling (exomePeak2's top-level API does NOT accept arbitrary covariates). Covers paired vs unpaired vs interaction designs, batch confounding (antibody lot, RNA prep, sequencing run) and the per-lot meta-analysis strategy when exomePeak2 is the primary caller, the stoichiometry-vs-expression-vs-IP-efficiency confound that all MeRIP differential methods inherit, normalisation choice (size factor on IP, on input, on per-sample IP/input ratio), the McIntyre 2020 reproducibility caveat, effect-size filtering as a guardrail against under-powered N=2 designs, and orthogonal-validation routes for absolute stoichiometry (GLORI / SAC-seq / m6Anet `mod_ratio`). Use when comparing m6A levels across two or more conditions, choosing between exomePeak2 / QNB / RADAR / MeTDiff for a given design, handling batch confounding when exomePeak2's API is too rigid, normalising against input properly, distinguishing real hyper- / hypo-methylation from expression-level shifts, applying effect-size thresholds, interpreting volcano plots of differential peaks, or planning a follow-up orthogonal stoichiometry validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.