2.9천건 · 관련도순
Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implements GitHub or GitLab issues via parallel subagents with review gates between task batches. Use when resolving multi-step issues end-to-end.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into Linear issues, one per slice, in a single target Linear team. Use when you want to publish work items as Linear issues, create implementation tickets to track in Linear, or push a broken-down plan into a Linear team. Requires a configured Linear MCP server and a target team. Reads the team's real workflow states, labels, Projects, and members and resolves every option against them before creating anything; defaults each issue to the team's initial state, unassigned, uncategorized, with no parent or Project unless you ask. Links within-file `Depends on` relationships as native Linear "blocked by" relations and annotates the source file so re-runs resume cleanly. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items first. Does not post to Jira — use work-items-to-jira. Does not post to GitHub — use work-items-to-issues.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Break a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into independently-grabbable Jira tickets, one per slice, in a single Jira project. Use when you want to turn a work-items file into Jira tickets, publish work items as Jira issues, or create implementation tickets that can be worked on and tracked in Jira. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items to break a plan into work items first. Does not post to GitHub — use work-items-to-issues for GitHub issues.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Break a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into independently-grabbable GitHub issues, one per slice, in each slice's target repo. Use when you want to turn a work-items file into GitHub issues, publish work items as issue tickets, or create implementation tickets that can be worked on and tracked on GitHub. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items to break a plan into work items first. Does not review code or post pull request comments — use post-code-review-to-pr for that.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Maintenance of the contributor issue pipeline for JSONbored/awesome-claude (HeyClaude) — closing issues that are already done but not marked so, and keeping a small, high-value contributor-available backlog stocked with real website/content/feature/bugfix work. Runs every ~24h via a dedicated scheduled task. Invoke for "run the issue gardening", "audit open issues for stale/complete ones", "generate new contributor issues", or any recurring/scheduled run of this process. `reference.md` (next to this file) has the exhaustive label/milestone/ template detail — read it before doing real work, not just this file. This is the awesome-claude-specific instance; JSONbored/loopover and JSONbored/metagraphed each have their own separate copy with different conventions and a much larger backlog target — do not cross-apply either repo's specifics to this one without being asked.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end open source contribution workflow: from scanning issues to submitting PRs. Use this skill whenever the user wants to contribute to an open source project, find issues to fix, submit a pull request, fork a repo to contribute, fix a GitHub issue, or mentions 'open source contribution'. Also trigger when they provide a GitHub repo URL and ask about contributing, say things like 'help me submit a PR', 'find good first issues', 'I want to contribute to X', or mention fixing bugs in someone else's project.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Identify design quality issues in code including high coupling, low cohesion, God classes, long methods, and other code smells. Use when: (1) Reviewing code architecture and design quality, (2) Identifying refactoring opportunities, (3) Detecting God classes or classes with too many responsibilities, (4) Finding high coupling or low cohesion issues, (5) Analyzing code maintainability and technical debt. Detects coupling smells, cohesion problems, complexity issues, size violations, and encapsulation problems with actionable refactoring suggestions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when creating, searching, updating, or managing GitHub issues via CLI. Triggers: "issue", "create issue", "gh issue", "task tracking", "context", "handoff", "resume task", "session context", "save progress", "active tasks", "in-progress", "my tasks", "open issues". Covers: gh commands, bulk operations, JSON/jq, search filters, issue-to-PR workflow, AI session context storage, task workflow with labels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Break a PRD into independently-workable issues and write each as a local markdown file in issues/. Use when the user wants to turn a PRD into a list of concrete tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Internal — for Boundless team members only. Cross-reference Boundless indexer API data, broker telemetry, and service logs to investigate production and staging operational issues. Use when the user wants to understand why slashings happened on prod/staging, diagnose prover or service failures in deployed environments, correlate market events with broker behavior, investigate fulfillment rate drops, look at prover/service logs, or perform any analysis that requires combining on-chain indexer data with off-chain broker telemetry and CloudWatch logs. Also use when the user asks to "investigate", "diagnose", or "find root cause" for prover, service, or market issues on live networks. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create, read, update, and link GitHub Issues as story artifacts throughout the story lifecycle. Use when managing issues for stories.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create, refine, and manage issues. Use for creating new issues from loose ideas, refining ambiguous issues, bulk operations, or JSON export.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Read and manage Linear issues, projects, cycles, teams, comments, and labels. Use this whenever the user wants to list their issues, search issues, create or update an issue, move an issue between states, add a comment, check a project or cycle, look up a team, or ask "what's on my plate in Linear" — even if they don't say "API" or "GraphQL". Also use it for any linear.app URL or an issue identifier like "ENG-123". Always start from this skill when interacting with this service — its bundled scripts and recipes are the fastest path.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Linear project management - issues, projects, cycles, and roadmaps. Use for Linear-related tasks like managing issues, tracking sprints, and organizing projects.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a local coding agent (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or similar) needs to operate Multica through the authenticated `multica` CLI: reading or updating issues, comments, metadata, labels, custom properties, subscribers, projects, agents, squads, runtimes, repos, skills, autopilots, attachments, or workspace state; searching issues; inspecting or cancelling agent runs; replying to a Multica issue from an external agent; creating or triaging issues; checking linked pull requests; or safely handling Multica mention/status side effects without relying on the Multica hosted agent runtime.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to fix P0s, address critical issues, or work on priorities from the weekly product briefing. Don't use for non-P0 issues or local bug fixes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Troubleshoot and resolve common issues with the ClickHouse Node.js client (@clickhouse/client). Use this skill whenever a user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or configuration questions involving the Node.js client specifically - including socket hang-up errors, Keep-Alive problems, stream handling issues, data type mismatches, read-only user restrictions, proxy/TLS setup problems, or long-running query timeouts. Trigger even when the user hasn't precisely named the issue; vague symptoms like "my inserts keep failing" or "connection drops randomly" in a Node.js context are strong signals to use this skill. Do NOT use for browser/Web client issues.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Break a PRD into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a PRD to issues, create implementation tickets, or break down a PRD into work items.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Triage the Gaia issue backlog and skill-batch intake queue. Use this skill when someone asks to: "triage issues", "clean up the issue tracker", "review the backlog", "close stale issues", "process the intake queue", "review skill-batches", "evaluate draft skill proposals", "approve or reject pending skills", "is this issue still valid?", "what's clogging the backlog?", "run a triage pass", or /gaia-triage. Covers two workstreams: (1) GitHub issue lifecycle — identifying resolved, stale, or need-more-info issues and acting on them via gh CLI; (2) skill-batch intake — evaluating draft proposals in registry-for-review/skill-batches/ and routing them toward promotion or rejection. This is the gatekeeping step before new skills enter the canonical registry; and (3) a cross-repo triage sweep — sizing, P0-P4 prioritization, umbrella/epic synthesis, and assignment across every gaia-research org repo, on the one headquarters tracker.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user wants to turn code graph analysis into tracked GitHub issues — "audit the architecture", "find god nodes", "triage architectural debt", "run graphify and log issues", "what's over-coupled in this codebase", "create issues from graphify findings", "check for structural problems", "scan for architectural smells", or any request that combines codebase topology analysis with issue tracking. This skill runs graphify to build a dependency graph, parses GRAPH_REPORT.md for god nodes and structural patterns, converts findings into GitHub issue payloads, and optionally pushes them to the repo. It bridges static analysis and project management in a single automated pass. Requires graphify and gh CLI.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.