'mitm' 검색 결과

Assess team health using Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team model. Use when a leader says "my team feels off", "we have trust issues", "people aren't speaking up in meetings", "accountability is a problem", "we keep missing commitments", "the team is siloed", "we're not working well together", or "I want to do a team health check". Also trigger when someone describes symptoms like passive agreement in meetings, blame culture, missed deadlines without escalation, or people optimizing for their own metrics over team goals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts U.S. capital call notices for PE, VC, or fund-managed LLCs aligned to LPA/operating agreement procedures and side letters. Use when drafting a capital call notice, drawdown notice, capital contribution demand, unfunded commitment call, or LP/GP capital call letter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts a mathematically balanced ALTA Settlement Statement for U.S. real estate closings, allocating debits and credits between buyer and seller with prorations, payoffs, lender fees, title charges, and transfer taxes. Enforces balance verification (seller credits minus debits equals cash to seller; buyer debits minus credits equals cash from buyer) and cross-references title commitment, loan documents, and purchase agreement. Use when preparing closing financials, settlement statements, HUD-equivalent documents, or real estate closing allocations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts Area Development Agreements granting exclusive multi-unit franchise territory rights with phased development schedules. Use when drafting area development agreements, multi-unit franchise expansions, territorial franchise grants, or phased development commitments. Enforces FTC Franchise Rule compliance and state registration requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Develop an independent visual language and turn the human-chosen direction into a production-ready graphic, brand, campaign, publication, web, or product system. Use when originality and differentiation matter enough to escape generic AI and Big Tech aesthetics. Guides a minimum-evidence start, ten isolated typography-led HTML design directions made only from type, color, and space, visual-first human judgement, explicit commitment, and concrete Round 2 production. Do not use for routine UI fixes, small components, or applying an existing design system.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Choose multi-agent architectures using environment-first analysis, coordination pressure, commitment tuning, and knowledge levels. Use for autonomy design, protocol choice, and coordination failures. NOT for single-agent planning, centralized schedulers, or prompt-only swarms.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when explicitly authorized lab traffic must be captured, searched, or exported from the project's mitmproxy-backed Docker lab recorder.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Capture what someone actually said without contaminating it with your own inference. Invoke when eliciting intent in conversation (design discussion, requirement interview, decision surfacing) and when turning a conversation into a durable record (ADR, decision node, memory entry, spec `## Decisions` row). Enforces quote-before-critique, keeps illustration separate from commitment, and holds interpretation subordinate to verbatim. Prevents the failure where unspecified space is filled by the recorder and then evaluated as if the speaker had specified it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns a vague "what should we do about X" into a scored decision - explicit actions, an explicit unknown, an explicit prior, and one utility scale - then picks by maximum expected utility and checks the result for framing effects. Use when facing a choice between options under uncertainty, when a decision has stalled in circular debate, when someone asks "should we do A or B", or before writing any decision record, strategy memo, or roadmap commitment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validates a plan before committing to it - checks whether the ranking survives the assumptions, finds the most likely way it fails, and makes the trade-offs explicit via a Pareto frontier instead of an invented single score. Use before a launch, price change, migration, infrastructure change or major commitment, when running a premortem, when two objectives conflict, or when a decision depends on an assumption nobody has tested.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

当用户因之前的承诺或表态而感到"必须坚持下去"，或在"明知不对但因说到做到而无法退出"时激活。用于识别承诺如何操控自我认知和行为，并区分机械一致与理性坚持。 不适用于: 纯信息查询、日常惯例性选择、正常的信守承诺行为。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs its information security policy set written or rebuilt, or asks "write our security policies", "draft the information security policy", "we need policies for the audit", "policy pack for a startup", "our template policies are 40 documents nobody reads" or "which policies do we actually need". Maps the policy set to the company's size and owners, drafts the top-level policy and the topic policies in testable language that reflects what the company does, flags commitments that need a decision, and prepares the approval and communication record for leadership.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a statement of applicability already exists and the team wants its exclusions to survive the audit, and asks "review our SoA exclusions", "is this a valid justification", "can we exclude physical security if we are fully remote", "the auditor challenged our not applicable controls", "rewrite our exclusion justifications" or "we outsource it, so it does not apply, right". Tests every excluded control against scope, assets, activities, suppliers, risks and commitments, gives each a keep, rewrite, reverse or ask verdict, and writes a review table plus rewritten justifications for the owner to approve.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a data processing agreement is being negotiated or renewed and someone asks "review the TOMs annex", "check the security measures in this DPA", "can we sign this annex", "the customer sent their DPA with a security schedule", "is our standard annex still true" or "does this vendor's annex promise enough". Breaks the technical and organisational measures annex into single commitments, compares each one with what the company actually runs or with what the use case needs, and writes a line-by-line review, proposed redlines and a list of practice gaps for owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an internal auditor has one process or area to audit and needs a working checklist built from the company's own documents, or asks "build an internal audit checklist", "audit questions for access management", "what do I test in the supplier process", "audit plan for this area", "how many samples should I take", "internal audit of our data protection process" or "test our incident process against what the policy says". Turns each commitment in the company's policies and procedures into a test with a question, a record to inspect, a sample and a pass criterion, adds framework-specific checks through a lookup, and writes a checklist file the auditor fills in during fieldwork.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a customer or prospect has sent a security questionnaire, due diligence form or vendor assessment and someone asks "answer this security questionnaire", "fill in the customer's vendor assessment", "draft answers from our policies", "we have 300 questions due Friday", "reuse our previous questionnaire answers" or "which answers can we not back up". Drafts every answer from the company's own documents with a source and a confidence level, flags answers without evidence and answers that create commitments, checks consistency with past answers, and writes an answer sheet plus a list of items for owners to confirm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Stress-test plans before committing by imagining they've already failed. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full pre-mortem session — vivid failure scene-setting, six failure categories, the monkey test, and concrete plan adjustments. Review mode checks previous findings monthly for changed probabilities and new failure modes. Alert Triggers mode defines and monitors early warning signals across four trigger categories. Use before any major commitment — strategy, investment, product launch, partnership — or regularly to keep assumptions honest. The planning fallacy is real. The spreadsheet looked great so everyone stopped thinking. This is the antidote. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Route agent work through AccInt's MCP memory loop: retrieve prior outcomes, resolve frames, and close commitments with evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect and prevent ARP spoofing attacks using ARPWatch, Dynamic ARP Inspection, Wireshark analysis, and custom monitoring scripts to protect against man-in-the-middle interception.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts an account plan from the CRM notes, emails, meeting notes and contracts the user provides: situation, stakeholder map, opportunities as recorded, risks, open commitments and proposed next actions, every line traced to a source and gaps marked UNKNOWN. Returns a DRAFT Markdown document in the chat. Use when the user asks to "build an account plan", "refresh the key account plan", "what do we know about this account", "account review for <customer>" or "what should happen next on this account". Do not use for preparing a first call with a prospect, use discovery-call-prep instead; for scoring inbound leads against a rubric use lead-qualification-scorer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Sorts a personal inbox backlog into five buckets (needs-reply-today, needs-reply-this-week, waiting-on-others, FYI, noise), writes DRAFT reply text for the messages that need an answer (up to 10 per run), and returns a dated triage report as one Markdown document. Lists moves or archives only as proposals for the user to perform, and only where a rule the user supplied says so; the agent changes nothing in the mailbox. Use when the user asks to "triage my inbox", "sort my mail", "clean up my inbox", "catch up after leave" or "what needs a reply today or this week". Do not use for a shared support queue or helpdesk export, use ticket-triage-pack instead; for what the user promised or is owed, use commitment-catcher; for one named thread, answer directly. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds a role-tuned morning brief as a dated Markdown document covering emails that need replies, today's calendar with conflicts flagged, chat mentions and upcoming deadlines, in the section order set by a preset (project manager, executive assistant, IT admin, sales or custom) read from an editable config. Use when the user asks to "run my brief", "give me my morning brief", "start-of-day summary", "switch my brief to the sales preset" or "change what my brief covers". Do not use for tracking promises made or owed across days, use commitment-catcher instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Capture decisions and commitments after a meeting and draft a concise follow-up.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.