'quality' 검색 결과

Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Combined verification — recite (description quality via cold-read prediction) + validate (schema compliance) + review (health checks). Use as a quality gate after creating notes or as periodic maintenance. Triggers on "/verify", "/verify [note]", "verify note quality", "check note health".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[omh] Tracking cost, tokens, latency, or service health: prepare an operations command-board for wrapper-safe token, cost, latency, run history, queue, failure-mode, external metric-provider, and service-quality evidence boundaries. Use when the user says: ops-observability-card, observability card, operations command board, ops command board, service quality board, service quality, external metric provider, metric provider.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[omh] AI agent progress for managers: help managers inspect AI-agent progress, blockers, quality gates, and throughput levers. Use when the user says: agent-ops-review, agent ops review, agent productivity, operator productivity, manager view, quality dashboard, throughput review, agent work quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate and interpret quality reports from FASTQ files using FastQC and MultiQC. Assess per-base quality, adapter content, GC bias, duplication levels, and overrepresented sequences. Use when performing initial QC on raw sequencing data or validating preprocessing results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality metrics for IMC data including signal-to-noise, channel correlation, tissue integrity, and acquisition QC. Use when assessing data quality before analysis or troubleshooting problematic acquisitions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality control for long-read sequencing data using NanoPlot, NanoStat, and chopper. Generate QC reports, filter reads by length and quality, and visualize read characteristics. Use when assessing ONT or PacBio run quality or filtering reads before assembly or alignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ChIP-seq quality control metrics including FRiP (Fraction of Reads in Peaks), cross-correlation analysis (NSC/RSC), library complexity, and IDR (Irreproducibility Discovery Rate) for replicate concordance. Use to assess experiment quality before downstream analysis. Use when assessing ChIP-seq data quality metrics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana 2 AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3.6 Flash for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, and complex scientific visualizations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Score one blog post (or a folder of posts) on a 5-category 100-point scale covering content quality, SEO, E-E-A-T, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Runs the deterministic analyzer first, then adds judgment and prioritized Critical/High/Medium/Low fixes. Advisory style diagnostics never infer authorship or affect the score. Exports markdown, JSON or table; works with MDX, markdown, HTML or a URL. Use when the user asks to analyze, score, rate or check the quality of specific posts ("analyze blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "rate this post"). For a site-wide health check (orphan pages, cannibalization, stale content, schema across all posts) use blog-audit instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Use when the user provides a cohort study article or text and needs a quality assessment report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when analyzing FASTQC quality reports from sequencing data, identifying quality issues in NGS datasets, or troubleshooting sequencing problems. Interprets quality metrics and provides actionable recommendations for RNA-seq, DNA-seq, and ChIP-seq data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Creates explicit validation checkpoints (verification gates) between project phases to catch errors early and ensure quality before proceeding. Use when the user asks about quality gates, milestone checks, phase transitions, approval steps, go/no-go decision points, or preventing cascading errors across a multi-step workflow. Produces acceptance criteria checklists, automated CI gate configurations, manual sign-off requirements, and conditional review rules for scenarios such as security changes, API changes, or database migrations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a content library, docs site, or blog for AI-generated filler that's eroding trust and search performance — and triage what to fix, rewrite, or delete. Use when asked to find slop in a content library, audit AI-written content quality, explain why content engagement or rankings dropped after scaling with AI, or set a quality bar for AI-assisted publishing. Produces an audited inventory with per-piece verdicts, the detection signals used, a triage plan, and a publishing quality gate that prevents recurrence. For a single article's AI-citability use aeo-optimizer; for the strategy itself use content-calendar or seo-content-brief.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI code quality checks. The Big 5: input validation, edge cases, error handling, duplication, complexity. Triggers: quality, big 5, ai code, review, validate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality gate: verify each acceptance criterion of a completed task/work unit, run quality checks, and create follow-up tasks for gaps. Use before merging or to audit delivered work. Invoked as /agiflow:review-work <work-unit-or-task>. Uses get_work_unit, get_task, update_task, create_task, create_task_comment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Select and use Audio Toolbox acoustic, psychoacoustic, and speech quality metrics. Use when computing loudness, sharpness, roughness, fluctuation strength, noise criteria (NC/RNC/RC), speech transmission index (STI), speech intelligibility index (SII), speech quality (ViSQOL, STOI), SPL, reverberation time (RT60), tone-to-noise ratio, or prominence ratio. Also use when asked about PESQ, POLQA, calibration factor, EBU R 128, LUFS, HVAC noise, background noise evaluation, or how to measure audio quality or noise compliance. Covers calibration, standard selection, signal alignment, and the complete function inventory including what does NOT exist.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up LLM-as-judge", "build an eval rubric", "compare model outputs pairwise", or "measure agent quality".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit data quality across pipelines, warehouses, and stores. Use when designing a DQ program, defining DQ dimensions, building rule-based checks, detecting schema drift, monitoring freshness SLAs, or responding to a DQ incident.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.