582건 · 관련도순
Organize human review in Arize by defining label choices, numeric ranges, or free-text feedback fields. Manage review queues and reviewers, submit annotations for individual records, and apply existing labels to project spans, or individual processing records, in bulk.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Transfer gene annotations between genome assemblies using Liftoff for same-species annotation liftover and MiniProt for cross-species protein-to-genome alignment. Enables rapid annotation of new assemblies using existing reference annotations. Use when annotating a new assembly of a species with an existing reference annotation or mapping annotations across related species.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma, Schwede & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2021 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma, Schwede & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2021 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Annotates bacterial and archaeal genomes (isolates, MAGs, plasmids) with Bakta (active versioned databases, NCBI-compliant output) or Prokka (legacy), producing GFF3/GenBank/EMBL/FASTA with INSDC locus tags. Covers Bakta-vs-Prokka-vs-PGAP-vs-DFAST choice, light-vs-full database tiers, translation-table selection (11/4/25), archaeal and leaderless-gene caveats, the small-ORF blind spot, pseudogene-vs-phase-variation, the pangenome re-annotation trap, and submission compliance. Use when annotating a newly assembled prokaryotic genome, choosing an annotation tool, re-annotating a collection for pangenomics, or preparing annotations for NCBI/DDBJ submission.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Add PUT workflow annotations to source files using the correct language-specific comment prefix. Covers annotation syntax, skeleton generation via put_generate(), multiline annotations, .internal variables, and validation. Supports 30+ languages with automatic comment prefix detection. Use after analyzing a codebase and having an annotation plan, when adding workflow documentation to new or existing source files, or when documenting data pipelines, ETL processes, or multi-step computations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Annotates bacterial and archaeal genomes (isolates, MAGs, plasmids) with Bakta (active versioned databases, NCBI-compliant output) or Prokka (legacy), producing GFF3/GenBank/EMBL/FASTA with INSDC locus tags. Covers Bakta-vs-Prokka-vs-PGAP-vs-DFAST choice, light-vs-full database tiers, translation-table selection (11/4/25), archaeal and leaderless-gene caveats, the small-ORF blind spot, pseudogene-vs-phase-variation, the pangenome re-annotation trap, and submission compliance. Use when annotating a newly assembled prokaryotic genome, choosing an annotation tool, re-annotating a collection for pangenomics, or preparing annotations for NCBI/DDBJ submission.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Annotates bacterial and archaeal genomes (isolates, MAGs, plasmids) with Bakta (active versioned databases, NCBI-compliant output) or Prokka (legacy), producing GFF3/GenBank/EMBL/FASTA with INSDC locus tags. Covers Bakta-vs-Prokka-vs-PGAP-vs-DFAST choice, light-vs-full database tiers, translation-table selection (11/4/25), archaeal and leaderless-gene caveats, the small-ORF blind spot, pseudogene-vs-phase-variation, the pangenome re-annotation trap, and submission compliance. Use when annotating a newly assembled prokaryotic genome, choosing an annotation tool, re-annotating a collection for pangenomics, or preparing annotations for NCBI/DDBJ submission.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
INVOKE THIS SKILL when creating, managing, or using annotation configs on Arize (categorical, continuous, freeform), or applying human annotations to project spans via the Python SDK. Configs are the label schema for human feedback on spans and other surfaces in the Arize UI. Triggers: annotation config, label schema, human feedback schema, bulk annotate spans, update_annotations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Add boxes, arrows, labels, and color-coded highlights to screenshots and diagrams using Pillow. Includes automatic label placement, detection of changed image regions, and guidance for timing annotations in animated GIF demonstrations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Read and display CARLA object bounding boxes, then project them onto a camera image as 2D rectangles. Export an annotated PNG and box coordinates in JSON for object detection annotation work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review Markdown files, HTML files, URLs, or folders in Plannotator’s annotation interface. The agent responds to requested changes and distinguishes them from approvals, optional approval notes, and sessions closed without feedback.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Open files, folders, or URLs in Plannotator’s annotation interface, then have the agent address the returned comments. Use it to review Markdown, plain-text configuration files, or HTML through a shared feedback workflow.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manage local projects for labeling text, images, audio, and video through the host application's MCP tools. Create projects, update labels and annotations, review saved work, and export approved results as JSON.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Interactive cell type annotation for IMC data. Covers napari-based annotation, marker-guided labeling, training data generation, and annotation validation. Use when manually annotating cell types for training classifiers or validating automated phenotyping results.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.