'assertion' 검색 결과

Using AwesomeAssertions for fluent and readable test assertion skill. Used when writing clear assertions, comparing objects, validating collections, handling complex comparisons. Covers Should(), BeEquivalentTo(), Contain(), ThrowAsync() and complete API. Keywords: assertions, awesome assertions, fluent assertions, assertion, fluent assertion, Should(), Be(), BeEquivalentTo, Contain, ThrowAsync, NotBeNull, object comparison, collection validation, exception assertion, AwesomeAssertions, FluentAssertions, fluent syntax

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

テストは存在するがアサーションが実質何も検証しておらず、実装が壊れても落ちない（常に PASS する）構造を diff-time で検出する。Check 1 missing assertion（テスト本体にアサーションが無い）、Check 2 tautological assertion（定数同士・入力自身・mock の戻り値自身を assert し SUT に依存しない）、Check 3 nonexistent expected literal（assertDontSee / assertNotContains 等の期待文字列が対象ファイルに実在しない）、Check 4 stale expected value（同一 diff で対象の出力が変わったのに期待値が据え置き）、Check 5 unscoped expectation（汎用的な属性・クラスを応答全体に対して assert し対象要素にスコープされていない）、Check 6 swallowed failure（例外の握り潰しや到達しない位置のアサーションで判定が成立しない）、の 6 Check を対象とする report-only。テストの有無は test-existence、未テスト経路の量は coverage-gap、非決定性は flaky-test、命名は test-naming、JS/TS の un-awaited resolves / rejects は vitest-mock-isolation、tdd-ledger artifact ベースの RED/GREEN 検証は plangate-tdd-evidence、.only / .skip / xit / @ts-ignore と空の catch は heuristic-review.mjs の決定論検出器へ委譲する

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Update Pester test assertions, checks of expected results, from classic v5 syntax to v6 Should-* commands. Identify behavior changes involving booleans, empty values, and collections, then verify the suite and report conversions needing human judgment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Convert assertions in PowerShell test files
• Adopt Should-* syntax one file at a time
• Review boolean, empty-value, and collection checks

Analyze assertion quality, depth, variety, and false confidence in existing tests. ALWAYS USE when asked about weak, shallow, trivial, always-true, self-referential, assertion-free, presence/truthiness-only, or insufficiently diverse assertions, including MSTest, Jest, pytest, and Go. DO NOT USE for direct fixes: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions; code-testing owns new cases. Use test-gap-analysis when asked whether tests would catch a production change, and test-anti-patterns for general severity-ranked audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze assertion quality, depth, variety, and false confidence in existing tests. ALWAYS USE when asked about weak, shallow, trivial, always-true, self-referential, assertion-free, presence/truthiness-only, or insufficiently diverse assertions, including MSTest, Jest, pytest, and Go. DO NOT USE for direct fixes: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions; code-testing owns new cases. Use test-gap-analysis when asked whether tests would catch a production change, and test-anti-patterns for general severity-ranked audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigate failing or flaky NemoClaw end-to-end tests, which check complete workflows. Trace each assertion through its inputs and implementation, including cleanup and dependent jobs, and produce an evidence ledger to guide authorized repairs and reruns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigate a failing end-to-end test
• Audit assertions that execution has not reached
• Review cleanup and dependent job requirements

Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a test file or suite; produce a severity-ranked diagnostic report. ALWAYS USE for tests that verify nothing, missing/tautological assertions, swallowed/broad exceptions, flaky/order-dependent tests, duplication, or magic values. Polyglot. DO NOT USE for direct edits: writing-mstest-tests owns supplied MSTest assertions/attributes/lifecycle; code-testing owns new tests. Exclude running tests, migration, assertion metrics (assertion-quality), raw .NET coverage collection (run-tests), non-.NET coverage collection/analysis (native tooling), project-wide .NET coverage/CRAP (coverage-analysis), named-target .NET CRAP (crap-score), behavioral/pseudo-mutation gaps (test-gap-analysis), test-mix/ happy-vs-error classification and trait distributions (test-tagging), or the testsmells.org catalog (test-smell-detection).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

xUnit, Moq/NSubstitute, FluentAssertions, and coverlet patterns for any .NET project. Covers test structure ([Fact]/[Theory]/[InlineData]), mocking discipline, fluent assertions, integration test setup with WebApplicationFactory, and coverage measurement. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every .NET plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write clear, maintainable unit tests with xUnit [Fact] and [Theory]. - Mock dependencies with Moq or NSubstitute without overusing mocks. - Write expressive assertions with FluentAssertions. - Measure coverage with coverlet and enforce a minimum threshold. Do NOT use this skill for: - ASP.NET Core-specific integration tests (WebApplicationFactory, HttpClient — those are in aspnet-core-plugin:aspnet-conventions). - EF Core in-memory or SQL Server LocalDB test patterns (aspnet-core-plugin:efcore-patterns). - C# language idioms — see csharp-foundation:csharp-conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

암묵적 가정(null 아님·범위·상태)을 Assert/Validate로 명시하여 가정 위반 시 즉시 발견. "assertion 추가", "전제 조건 명시", "가정을 코드로", "/introduce-assertion" 요청 시 사용. 단, 반복되는 null 검사를 객체로 대체하는 것은 /introduce-special-case가 적합. /introduce-assertion [commit-ref]로 호출.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Replace TypeScript type assertions in tests with functions from @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use partial objects when only a few properties matter, or deliberately invalid data for error tests, then run a type check to verify the migration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Replace as assertions in TypeScript tests
• Build test objects with only the properties you need
• Pass deliberately invalid data for error tests

Review Ant Design tests to decide whether they should be kept, rewritten, or removed. Examine documented behavior and existing coverage to identify duplicate checks or assertions that merely repeat implementation details, with concise reasons for each conclusion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Deciding whether a test should be kept, rewritten, or removed
• Finding assertions that merely repeat implementation details
• Checking for duplicate test coverage

Review TypeScript type assertions, which tell the compiler to treat a value as a chosen type. Replace bare casts with better types or runtime checks, and use explicit helpers with specific reasons when an escape hatch remains necessary.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review an assertion used to silence a type error
• Replace a double assertion such as as unknown as
• Reduce existing casts while editing production files

Write and improve C# unit tests with MSTest 3.x/4.x. Covers assertions that check expected results, tests with multiple input sets, asynchronous setup, cleanup, and test organization, with guidance on APIs that differ between versions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Create a C# unit test project
• Test multiple input sets with DataRow or DynamicData
• Update exception checks to modern assertion APIs

Maintain existing Handsontable browser tests built with Jasmine and Puppeteer. Covers asynchronous operations, simulated user input, assertions that work across themes, targeted test runs, and guidance for moving broken or unreliable tests to Playwright.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Updating an existing Jasmine browser test
• Fixing assertions that fail under different themes
• Checking simulated mouse, keyboard, and touch input

Write and review Handsontable tests that check intended behavior. The skill guides bug reproduction, meaningful assertions, failure diagnosis, and fresh test runs, while covering mock boundaries and migration of broken legacy tests to Playwright.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reproducing a bug with a failing test
• Diagnosing whether code or test expectations are wrong
• Reviewing assertions for meaningful behavior checks

Audit recovered bug reproduction tests before writing a fix or reviewing a pull request. Check that assertions reflect intended behavior, establish a valid failure on unfixed code, and verify the same test passes after the fix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking recovered reproduction tests before fixing a bug
• Validating test evidence for a pull request
• Rewriting weak assertions around actual behavior

Hunt SAML / SSO attacks. Patterns: XML Signature Wrapping (XSW) — modify Assertion while keeping Signature valid by relocating signed element, comment injection in NameID (admin@target.com<!--evil-->@attacker.com → some parsers see admin@target.com), signature stripping (remove Signature element entirely, server should reject but doesn't), key confusion (signed by attacker's IdP, accepted by SP), audience-restriction not validated, replay attack (same Assertion accepted twice within validity window). Tools: SAML Raider Burp extension, samlmagic, manual XML manipulation. Detection: any /saml endpoint, /Shibboleth.sso, /sso/saml/, Microsoft ADFS endpoints. Validate: account takeover via altered NameID, admin role injection via altered AttributeStatement. Use when hunting SSO flows, when SAML AssertionConsumerService is reachable, when chaining IdP-trust to SP-impersonation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Hunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

SAML SSO assertion attack playbook. Use when testing signature validation, assertion wrapping, audience restrictions, ACS handling, XML trust boundaries, and enterprise SSO flaws.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Fix "ref.listen can only be used within the build method of a ConsumerWidget" assertion error in Flutter Riverpod 3.x. Use when: (1) ConsumerStatefulWidget crashes with "Failed assertion: line 492 pos 7: 'debugDoingBuild'" in flutter_riverpod consumer.dart, (2) ref.listen is called inside initState, addPostFrameCallback, or any lifecycle method other than build(), (3) All widget tests fail with this assertion from scheduler callback. Applies to flutter_riverpod 3.0+ with ConsumerStatefulWidget.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically infer formal correctness properties from Verilog/SystemVerilog RTL code and generate SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA). Identifies control-flow invariants (mutual exclusion, valid-ready handshakes, pipeline ordering, safety properties), liveness expectations, and temporal properties. Use when working with RTL designs that need formal property generation, when adding assertions to existing RTL, or when users ask to infer properties, generate assertions, or create formal specifications from hardware designs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically infer loop invariants for code verification and correctness proofs. Use when analyzing loops to identify properties that hold throughout execution, generating assertions for verification, proving loop correctness, or documenting loop behavior. Supports Python, Java, C/C++, and language-agnostic analysis. Generates invariants as code assertions (assert statements). Triggers when users ask to infer invariants, find loop properties, generate loop assertions, prove loop correctness, or verify loop behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate test assertions from existing code implementation. Use when the user has implementation code without tests or incomplete test coverage, and needs assertions synthesized by analyzing the code's behavior, inputs, outputs, and state changes. Supports Python (pytest/unittest), Java (JUnit/AssertJ), and JavaScript/TypeScript (Jest/Chai). Handles equality checks, collections, exceptions, and state verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.