'binding affinity' 검색 결과

Generate candidate positions and orientations for small molecules binding to proteins with DiffDock and DiffDock-L. Prepare single or batch docking runs, organize predicted poses by model confidence, and review validation needs without treating confidence as binding affinity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Predicting binding poses for a protein and small molecule
• Preparing and validating batch docking inputs
• Comparing poses across receptor conformations

Cofold protein-ligand, protein-protein, and nucleic-acid complexes with Boltz-2, and predict binding affinity with its trained affinity head. Use this skill to build Boltz input YAML, run structure prediction with MSAs, pocket constraints, templates, and modified residues, screen compound libraries by cofolding, and interpret confidence scores (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM, PDE) and affinity output (binder probability and log10 IC50). Also trigger on Boltz, Boltz-1, Boltz-2, cofolding, boltz predict, affinity_pred_value, affinity_probability_binary, ipTM, or open-weights AlphaFold3 alternatives.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Hybrid ML + physics binding affinity prediction. Empirical scoring, MM/GBSA rescoring, multi-method consensus, and batch virtual screening for protein-ligand complexes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NOTE: molecule and target inputs and your NGC_API_KEY are transmitted to external NVIDIA-hosted API endpoints on every call. Use local NIM containers for confidential or proprietary data. Run a complete computational drug discovery pipeline using NVIDIA BioNeMo NIMs: generate drug-like molecules with GenMol, dock them to a protein target with DiffDock, then predict binding affinity with Boltz2. Use this skill whenever the user wants to generate and screen small molecule drug candidates, perform hit discovery, optimize leads against a protein target, or do virtual screening combining molecule generation, docking, and affinity prediction. Triggers on: drug discovery pipeline, hit discovery, lead optimization, virtual screening, molecule generation, molecular docking, binding affinity, GenMol, DiffDock, Boltz2, SMILES, SAFE notation, NIM microservice. This is a multi-step pipeline composing three BioNeMo NIMs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Predict peptide-MHC class I binding and natural presentation with MHCflurry, NetMHCpan-4.1, and MixMHCpred to nominate candidate CD8 T-cell epitopes. Covers the binding-affinity (BA) vs eluted-ligand (EL/presentation) distinction, why %Rank beats raw nM for cross-allele work, the MS abundance bias that misranks low-expression neoantigens, allele-coverage inequity, and length bias. Use when scanning a protein or peptide set for class I epitopes, scoring neoantigen candidates, or choosing a binding predictor. For CD4/HLA class II see mhc-class-ii-prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Predict peptide-MHC class I binding and natural presentation with MHCflurry, NetMHCpan-4.1, and MixMHCpred to nominate candidate CD8 T-cell epitopes. Covers the binding-affinity (BA) vs eluted-ligand (EL/presentation) distinction, why %Rank beats raw nM for cross-allele work, the MS abundance bias that misranks low-expression neoantigens, allele-coverage inequity, and length bias. Use when scanning a protein or peptide set for class I epitopes, scoring neoantigen candidates, or choosing a binding predictor. For CD4/HLA class II see mhc-class-ii-prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Predict peptide-MHC class I binding and natural presentation with MHCflurry, NetMHCpan-4.1, and MixMHCpred to nominate candidate CD8 T-cell epitopes. Covers the binding-affinity (BA) vs eluted-ligand (EL/presentation) distinction, why %Rank beats raw nM for cross-allele work, the MS abundance bias that misranks low-expression neoantigens, allele-coverage inequity, and length bias. Use when scanning a protein or peptide set for class I epitopes, scoring neoantigen candidates, or choosing a binding predictor. For CD4/HLA class II see mhc-class-ii-prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan protein characterization experiments with Adaptyv's cloud laboratory, estimate costs, submit sequences, track progress, and retrieve measured results. Supports binding, thermal stability, expression, fluorescence, and enzyme activity workflows through the API and Python SDK.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Plan binding screens for candidate protein sequences
• Estimate experiment costs before submission
• Track laboratory progress and retrieve results

Predict peptide-MHC class I and II binding affinity using MHCflurry and NetMHCpan neural network models. Identify potential T-cell epitopes from protein sequences. Use when predicting MHC binding for vaccine design or neoantigen identification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Query BindingDB for protein-ligand binding affinity data

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use Boltz2 NIM for biomolecular structure prediction and binding affinity. Invoke for Boltz2, protein structures, protein-ligand/DNA/RNA complexes, SMILES or CCD ligands, pIC50/IC50 affinity scoring, mmCIF output, hosted NVIDIA API calls, or local Docker deployment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

smina molecular docking CLI. AutoDock Vina fork with customizable scoring functions, native SDF/MOL2/PDB ligand input, autoboxing, local energy minimization, and per-atom score breakdowns. Pipeline: receptor PDBQT prep -> ligand prep (RDKit/OpenBabel) -> dock via autobox or explicit grid -> rescore/minimize with custom scoring -> rank poses by affinity. Choose smina over Vina when you need custom scoring terms (--custom_scoring), local optimization of an existing pose (--local_only), per-atom contributions (--atom_term_data), or SDF/MOL2 ligands without manual PDBQT conversion. For unknown binding sites use diffdock; for the Python-bindings/Vinardo workflow use autodock-vina-docking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

API + Python SDK for ordering cell-free protein expression and binding assays. Submit sequences for expression (10–100 µg), measure binding affinity (KD) against targets, track status, and retrieve results programmatically — no wet-lab setup. Built for ML-guided directed evolution and antibody/nanobody optimization. Requires Adaptyv account and API key.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when diagnosing NPU + PyTorch or LLM Serving Host CPU affinity, NUMA locality, cgroup/cpuset constraints, CPU range conflicts, PyTorch/runtime threading, DataLoader, tokenizer, scheduler, vLLM-Ascend, SGLang, TTFT, TPOT, tokens/s, QPS, or multi-rank/multi-worker CPU binding issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

API + Python SDK for ordering cell-free protein expression and binding assays. Submit sequences for expression (10–100 µg), measure binding affinity (KD) against targets, track status, and retrieve results programmatically — no wet-lab setup. Built for ML-guided directed evolution and antibody/nanobody optimization. Requires Adaptyv account and API key.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run protein structure prediction, molecular design, and docking tools on Tamarind Bio without a local GPU. Guides tool selection, input validation, job submission, batch processing, and result retrieval through its REST API or MCP server.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Predicting protein structures in the cloud
• Running binder or antibody design tools
• Submitting batches of sequences for analysis

Structure prediction for protein, nucleic-acid, and small-molecule complexes with Boltz-2 (Passaro & Wohlwend et al. 2025, github.com/jwohlwend/boltz). Reach for this skill to validate designed binders against a target, to co-fold a protein with a SMILES or CCD ligand, or to get an open-source AlphaFold3 alternative with optional binding-affinity prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Predict small-molecule binding poses with DiffDock-L (Corso et al. 2023/2024, github.com/gcorso/DiffDock) — blind diffusion docking that places a ligand into a protein pocket without a predefined search box and ranks the samples with a learned confidence model. Reach for this skill to dock a SMILES or SDF against a PDB, to generate ranked 3D poses for a small fragment library, or to get a starting pose for downstream rescoring. DiffDock predicts geometry, not affinity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.