'coherence' 검색 결과

Perform time-frequency analysis in MATLAB using CWT, STFT, synchrosqueezing, reassignment, wavelet coherence, cross spectrogram, EMD/VMD, multiresolution analysis, and time-frequency filtering. Triggers on: time-frequency, spectrogram, scalogram, cwt, stft, istft, fsst, wsst, wcoherence, xspectrogram, modwt, modwtmra, modwpt, emd, vmd, hht, tffilt, dgt, gabor, instantaneous frequency, synchrosqueezing, reassignment, ridge extraction, wavelet coherence, cross spectrum, mode decomposition, signal decomposition, time-frequency filtering.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design a scope and sequence showing vertical and horizontal curriculum coherence across a programme or year. Use when building new programmes, restructuring subjects, or ensuring progression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design a scope and sequence showing vertical and horizontal curriculum coherence across a programme or year. Use when building new programmes, restructuring subjects, or ensuring progression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI multi-path reasoning coherence using bee democracy — independent evaluation of competing approaches, waggle dance as reasoning-out-loud, quorum sensing for confidence thresholds, and deadlock resolution. Use when forage-solutions has identified multiple valid approaches and a selection must be made, when oscillating between options without committing, when justifying an architecture or tool choice with structured reasoning, or before an irreversible action where the cost of the wrong choice is high.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compare a component's own design needs with the goals of the larger system through three structured passes. The result identifies conflicts, recommends an appropriate scope, and assesses whether the proposed design fits the whole.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choosing between a service, a library, and inline code
• Comparing feature requests with product goals
• Checking how new components fit an existing system

The **Coherence Composer** is an epistemological skill that validates structural consistency and explores counterfactual worlds while respecting constraints from both **Commitment Tracker** (ontology) and **Opacity Detector** (epistemology).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit skill lifecycle by tracing call chains, detecting circular dependencies, finding instruction contradictions, identifying duplicated datasets, analyzing bidirectional coherence, discovering scriptable sequences, and learning patterns. Use when checking skill coherence, validating skill workflow, finding semantic gaps in plugin structure, or auditing plugin before marketplace submission. Generates audit reports to .plugin-creator/audits/ with findings by dimension.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when reviewing or auditing a library of Claude Code skills, agents, slash commands, and workflows — frontmatter correctness, routing quality, tool allowlists, command arg-hints, workflow meta/phase coherence, cross-reference coherence, single-responsibility, file structure, and anti-pattern detection. Triggers on mentions of "review skills", "audit agents", "skill library", "agent definition review", "review this command", "review this workflow", "is this skill right", or when iterating on `.claude/skills/`, `.claude/agents/`, `.claude/commands/`, or `.claude/workflows/` directories. For code review of source code see code-review-and-quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Protocol for auditing API surface coherence and type safety. Trigger when: - Evaluating API designs, interface type safety, or design elegance. - Prompt contains: /api-audit, API surface, API coherence, type safety.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Goal-directed review of git history for change coherence. Trigger when: - Analyzing project history, reviewing diffs, or checking commit messages for alignment. - Prompt contains: /git-review, git history, commit log, change coherence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

후보 탐색과 비교를 반복하며 근거와 판단을 추가 기록 방식의 장부에 남깁니다. 이전 결과와의 일관성과 재검증 결과를 확인하고 실거래나 운영 작업의 실행 조건을 명확히 합니다.

• 여러 차례 시도하며 후보를 비교할 때
• 판단의 근거를 기록할 때
• 새 정보로 이전 채택 후보를 재평가할 때

Review Agent-Native Research Artifacts, structured research packages for agents, across six dimensions of research quality. Produce a JSON report with scores, strengths, severity-ranked findings, practical improvements, and an overall acceptance or rejection recommendation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing an ARA before publication
• Checking whether evidence supports research claims
• Assessing experimental methods and research records

Quantum physics simulation library for open quantum systems. Use when studying master equations, Lindblad dynamics, decoherence, quantum optics, or cavity QED. Best for physics research, open system dynamics, and educational simulations. NOT for circuit-based quantum computing—use qiskit, cirq, or pennylane for quantum algorithms and hardware execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Chinese LaTeX thesis assistant for existing .tex degree thesis projects (XeLaTeX/LuaLaTeX/latexmk). Use this skill whenever a user works on a Chinese master's or doctoral thesis needing compilation, GB/T 7714 bibliography checks, chapter structure mapping, template detection (thuthesis, pkuthss), terminology consistency, logic coherence review, heading lead-in checks, title optimization, de-AI editing, experiment chapter review, three-line table validation, or abstract structure diagnosis. Trigger even for single issues like "帮我编译论文", "检查国标格式", "看看绪论逻辑", "毕业论文", "学位论文", "硕士/博士论文", "三线表", "检查摘要", or "摘要结构".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Polishes academic English paragraph by paragraph, reviewing grammar, word choice, voice, coherence, and sentence structure. Outputs revision suggestions alongside polished text. Triggered by phrases like 'polish this paragraph,' 'check the grammar,' 'rewrite in academic English,' or keywords like manuscript editing, SCI polishing, and journal submission editing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run condition-based vault health diagnostics. 8 categories — schema compliance, orphan detection, link health, description quality, three-space boundaries, processing throughput, stale notes, MOC coherence. 3 modes — quick (schema+orphans+links), full (all 8), three-space (boundary violations only). Returns actionable FAIL/WARN/PASS report with specific fixes ranked by impact. Triggers on "/health", "check vault health", "maintenance report", "what needs fixing".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Re-derive your knowledge system from first principles when structural drift accumulates. Analyzes dimension incoherence, vocabulary mismatch, boundary dissolution, and template divergence. Preserves all content while restructuring architecture.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Critique a rendered screen's colour — contrast ratios, palette coherence, and semantic meaning. Use when reviewing one screen. For a product-wide WCAG audit use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems); for building the palette use `color-system` (ui-design).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Hierarchical coordination and drift detection with frequent checkpoints, shared memory coherence validation, role specialization enforcement, and short task cycles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when stress-testing the LOGIC of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) theory manuscript — checking logical coherence, running thought experiments and counterfactuals, addressing alternative explanations and disconfirming cases, and verifying each proposition follows from its argument. This is ARGUMENT DEVELOPMENT, NOT data analysis; AMR publishes no datasets, no statistics, and no empirical results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform the final submission-level audit of mathematical-modeling workflow integrity, evidence quality, anti-fabrication, paper coherence, figures, references, and contest readiness after consistency and completeness audits pass.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Walk the user through four directional axes (tone register, aesthetic philosophy, audience relationship, sensory ambition) and produce a structured aesthetic brief that downstream content, copy, design, and art-direction skills consume as required input. The aesthetic depth layer, distinct from `creative-brief` (operational kickoff: scope, audience, deliverables, constraints). Use when a project needs aesthetic coherence across many small decisions and the user has only a vague feeling, or when multiple downstream aesthetic-producing skills need a shared brief. Triggers on creative direction, aesthetic direction, set the aesthetic, define the visual direction, what's the vibe, what's the tone, the four axes. Does NOT fire for a general kickoff brief (use `creative-brief`), tactical single-piece work, already-documented direction, purely functional output, or locked production-stage work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Shared artifact registry, common artifact patterns, and integration validation. Load when tracking data that flows across journey steps or validating horizontal coherence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.