'corporate' 검색 결과

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Adjust an existing corporate legal practice profile through guided questions. Change risk preferences, contacts, review thresholds, active modules, or workspace paths, with an explanation of how each change affects related workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Change thresholds used to flag important contracts
• Update team contacts and escalation paths
• Enable or disable corporate legal modules

Set up a corporate legal practice profile through guided questions about responsibilities, company context, document formats, and review thresholds. Select relevant practice areas, save their settings, and refresh individual modules or check connected services later.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Setting up a corporate legal plugin for the first time
• Saving house formats and review thresholds
• Refreshing settings for one practice area

Drafts U.S. corporate board-of-directors meeting minutes into formal, defensible records documenting valid corporate action and governance process. Triggers on board minutes, directors meeting record, board resolutions, quorum validation, motion and vote capture, corporate secretary records, governance drafting. Requires source materials such as agenda, attendance, bylaws, notices, reports, prior minutes, and resolutions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply corporate brand standards to PowerPoint, Excel, and PDF documents. The skill guides colors, fonts, layouts, logo placement, and writing style, with scripts for applying formatting and checking compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Creating presentations with consistent corporate branding
• Standardizing spreadsheet tables and charts
• Checking PDF layouts and writing style

Set up a Windows sandbox in Daytona to test OpenWork with a simulated corporate certificate authority. Check successful and broken HTTPS connections, the desktop app’s use of Windows trust, and certificate handling in runtimes it launches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reproducing corporate certificate failures on Windows
• Checking OpenWork’s use of trusted Windows certificates
• Comparing valid and broken HTTPS certificate chains

Test iPolloWork's handling of corporate certificates in a Daytona Windows sandbox. Set up valid and broken HTTPS certificate chains, then verify that the desktop app and runtimes it starts use certificates trusted by Windows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reproduce corporate certificate failures on Windows
• Verify that the app uses Windows certificate trust
• Compare valid and broken HTTPS certificate chains

Manages RoPA for complex multi-entity corporate groups including entity-level versus group-level records, intra-group transfer documentation, and shared processing coordination. Activate for group RoPA, multi-entity, corporate group, intra-group transfers, subsidiary records, holding company.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides development and approval of Binding Corporate Rules under GDPR Article 47 for intra-group international data transfers. Covers Art. 47(2)(a)-(n) content requirements, BCR approval process with lead supervisory authority, and WP256/WP257 referentials. Keywords: BCR, binding corporate rules, intra-group transfers, Art. 47.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate professional company tear sheets using S&P Capital IQ data via the Kensho LLM-ready API MCP server. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a tear sheet, company one-pager, company profile, fact sheet, company snapshot, or company overview document — especially when they mention a specific company name or ticker. Also trigger when users ask for equity research summaries, M&A company profiles, corporate development target profiles, sales/BD meeting prep documents, or any concise single-company financial summary. This skill supports four audience types: equity research, investment banking/M&A, corporate development, and sales/business development. If the user doesn't specify an audience, ask. Works for both public and private companies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

BMW's corporate site — distinct from BMW M's motorsport-bombastic variant, this is a measured and settled corporate-automotive interface. On a light (cream-tinted white) canvas, BMW corporate blue (#1c69d4) carries every primary CTA; dark navy hero bands frame model photography. BMW Type Next Latin sets the entire hierarchy on two weights — heavy 700 display and Light 300 body. Configuration and reservation flows ride a card-based 4-up grid, where each card holds a model render, a name, and a "Learn More" link.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

企业财务与 CFO 视角 (企业财务与 CFO 视角 (Corporate Finance & the CFO Lens) — 面向创业公司与中小企业主/创始人/业务负责人的『看懂钱、管住钱、用好钱』的财务判断,不是考注会/中级职称的准则背诵,也不是投行卖方并购执行或 VC 投资人的看项目视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **利润是观点,现金是事实(权责发生制下的利润由收入确认时点、折旧摊销年限、存货计价、资本化与费用化的选择拼出来,是一组可辩论的判断;银行户头的钱是唯一不能辩论的事实——所以 CFO 看三张表的顺序是现金流量表→资产负债表→利润表,与外行相反) ⇄ 增长本身要烧钱(账面盈利的公司照样会因营运资金被增长吸干而倒闭:先付供应商、后收客户钱,规模越大缺口越大,这是『增长性破产』;所以现金转换周期比毛利率更早预警) ⇄ 记账合规派 vs 管理决策派(一套账是给税局与审计看的准则语言,另一套视图是给经营者看的贡献边际与单位经济;同一笔成本在两种语言里归属不同,把合规科目直接拿来做定价决策是中小企业最常见的错) ⇄ 全成本分摊 vs 贡献边际(把固定成本按产量分摊进单件成本,会在淡季得出『卖一件亏一件所以停产』的错误结论;边际思维只问增量收入是否覆盖增量成本,但长期只看边际会让公司永远收不回固定成本) ⇄ 预算是承诺 vs 预算是地图(传统年度预算把数字变成考核契约,导致部门年底突击花钱与藏预算;滚动预测与超越预算派主张预算只是当前最好的猜测,该月月刷新) ⇄ 融资是里程碑 vs 融资是负债(融资新闻稿把估值当成绩,但优先股、优先清算权、对赌与回购条款让创始人在低价退出时可能一分不拿;自筹派认为最便宜的钱是客户的预付款) ⇄ 估值方法之争(DCF 的数学严谨但对增长率与折现率假设极敏感,业内讥为『垃圾进垃圾出』;可比公司倍数简单但把市场情绪打包进来;早期公司两者都不成立,实际靠谈判与稀释目标倒推) ⇄ EBITDA 是不是有用(PE 与并购圈把它当经营现金流代理,巴菲特与芒格公开斥其忽略了折旧背后真实的资本开支;调整后 EBITDA 的『加回』项在业内被视为高危信号) ⇄ 财务是记分员 vs 财务是业务伙伴(传统财务事后出报表,财务 BP/FP&A 主张财务应在决策前进场做定价、投产、招人的经济性测算) ⇄ 中国中小企业的两套账现实 vs 合规红线(金税四期与社保入税之后,业内公认的做法是尽早并账,但这条张力必须如实呈现而不是装作不存在,也绝不给出规避税收的操作建议)); (b) 工具栈(记账层与决策层是两套东西) — 记账与 ERP(用友、金蝶、Odoo、QuickBooks、Xero、NetSuite、SAP Business One)、中国财税合规(电子税务局、金税四期发票与进销项比对、百望/航天信息电子发票、慧算账等代账 SaaS、个税与社保申报)、FP&A 与预算(Excel 与 Google Sheets 仍是绝对主力,之上是 Cube、Causal、Jirav、Mosaic、Runway、Abacum、Pigment、Anaplan、Planful)、现金流预测(Float、Fathom、13 周滚动现金流模板)、股权与 cap table(Carta、Pulley、AngelList、Excel 稀释模型,中国的股权代持与持股平台)、订阅计费与收入确认(Stripe Billing、Chargebee、Maxio)、费控报销(Ramp、Brex、Expensify、汇联易、分贝通)、BI 与看板(Power BI、Tableau、Metabase、帆软)、以及最被低估的纸笔工具(一页纸的驱动因素模型、贡献边际表、13 周现金日历)—— 选型的真正分岔是『公司在哪个阶段、由谁来维护这个模型』,不是厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 三张表的勾稽关系(利润表的净利经现金流量表调整后落到资产负债表的未分配利润)、权责发生制与收付实现制的差、现金转换周期 CCC 与 DSO/DIO/DPO、营运资金与增长的耦合、贡献边际与盈亏平衡点、经营杠杆与固定成本结构、单位经济与 LTV/CAC 及回本周期、烧钱率与现金跑道 runway、自由现金流与业主收益 owner earnings、资本成本与机会成本、净现值与内部收益率、投入资本回报率 ROIC 与增长的价值条件(只有 ROIC 高于资本成本时增长才创造价值)、股权稀释与优先清算权的退出瀑布、递延收入是负债不是收入; (d) 工作流/SOP — 月度关账与管理报表包(关账日历、计提、对账、出具一页纸经营分析)、13 周滚动现金流预测的搭建与每周刷新、年度预算与滚动预测(自上而下目标与自下而上驱动因素模型的对撞)、定价与成本核算(标准成本、作业成本法、贡献边际定价与报价审批)、应收账款与账期管理(信用政策、账龄表、催收节奏、保理与供应链金融)、融资轮次建模(投前投后估值、期权池扩容对创始人的额外稀释、SAFE 与可转债转股、优先清算权下的退出分配)、投资决策与产能/招人测算(增量现金流、回收期、敏感性分析)、税务合规日历与汇算清缴、董事会与投资人财务包、尽调与数据室准备、以及财务模型的三表联动搭建; (e) 知识正典(en 一手极厚,中文一手集中在高校教授与准则原文) — 《Financial Intelligence》Berman & Knight(给非财务经理的入门标准)、《Financial Statements》Thomas Ittelson、Brealey·Myers·Allen《Principles of Corporate Finance》(公司金融教科书)、Damodaran 的估值三部曲与《Narrative and Numbers》及其 NYU 公开课与免费数据集、《Simple Numbers, Straight Talk, Big Profits!》Greg Crabtree(中小企业实操)、《Venture Deals》Feld & Mendelson(条款与稀释)、《Financial Shenanigans》Howard Schilit(识别财务粉饰)、《The Outsiders》Thorndike(资本配置)、《Accounting for Value》Penman、伯克希尔股东信中的业主收益与商誉摊销讨论、《The Essays of Warren Buffett》、《Profit First》Michalowicz(流行但有争议)、IFRS 15/16 与 ASC 606 收入与租赁准则原文、中国企业会计准则 CAS 与小企业会计准则、肖星《一本书读懂财报》与清华的财务分析公开课、张新民的财务报表分析体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — Aswath Damodaran(NYU,估值教父,博客与公开课与数据集全免费开放,一手素材极厚)、Michael Mauboussin(ROIC 与资本配置的实证写作)、Howard Schilit(财务舞弊识别)、Karen Berman 与 Joe Knight(财务素养普及)、Greg Crabtree(中小企业现金与利润实操)、Brad Feld 与 Jason Mendelson(创业融资条款)、David Skok 与 Jason Lemkin 与 David Sacks(SaaS 单位经济与烧钱效率指标)、Warren Buffett 与 Charlie Munger(对 EBITDA 与股权激励费用化的著名批评)、CJ Gustafson 等现役 CFO 的时事通讯作者、以及中文圈的肖星与张新民等高校学者; (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — 调整后 EBITDA 与非公认会计准则指标的滥用(把股权激励与一次性费用年年加回)、DCF 对假设的极端敏感与被用来事后合理化结论、独角兽估值与优先清算权造成的『纸面身价』幻觉、对赌与回购条款把股权融资变成隐性债务、Profit First 现金分桶法被专业会计批评为回避真实成本结构、作业成本法的实施失败率高、预算游戏与年底突击花钱、财务 BP 沦为报表美化、中国中小企业两套账的历史现实与金税四期后的合规收敛(如实呈现风险,不提供规避操作)、以及『融资额等于成功』的媒体叙事对创始人的误导; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **准则与合规派(IASB/FASB/财政部,信可比性与审计留痕,语言是准则条文)** vs **管理会计/决策派(IMA 与贡献边际、作业成本法、有效产出会计,信决策相关性高于合规一致性)** vs **公司金融/估值派(Brealey-Myers-Allen 与 Damodaran,信现金流折现与资本成本)** vs **价值投资/资本配置派(巴菲特-芒格-Thorndike-Mauboussin,信业主收益与 ROIC,公开鄙视 EBITDA)** vs **创业与 SaaS 指标派(Skok-Lemkin-Sacks-Bessemer,信单位经济、回本周期与烧钱倍数)** vs **中小企业现金实操派(Crabtree、Profit First 一脉,信老板看得懂的少数几个数)**。不含: 投行卖方并购执行与尽调建模(已由 investment-banking-mna 覆盖)、VC 投资人的看项目与投后视角(已由 vc-investor 覆盖)、个人理财与二级市场投资(已由 personal-investing 覆盖)、注册会计师考证与准则条文背诵、以及任何税收规避操作建议。) Master O

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Corporate innovation-governance toolkit integrating Stage-Gate process, 3 Horizons model, innovation portfolio management, open innovation, corporate venture capital (CVC), innovation KPIs, and intrapreneurship. Use for innovation-portfolio design, second-curve planning, innovation-project review gating, open-innovation evaluation, CVC setup, innovation-KPI design, or managing tension between core and new businesses. Triggers: 『第二曲線』『創新專案怎麼管』『新事業孵化』『收購投資新創』『Stage-Gate』『研發投資組合』『內部創業』『開放式創新』『CVC』『3 Horizons』『創新 KPI』. For Taiwan EMBA innovation-management/strategy/technology-management cases (台大／中山). Startup basics: use Asgard `ux-lean-startup`; innovation theory: use Asgard `grad-disruptive-innovation`, `grad-ambidexterity`; 家族二代接班治理: use `biz-corporate-governance` 或 `ops-talent-strategy`; ESG/淨零策略結合: use `biz-net-zero-transition`.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Corporate-governance practice playbook: board composition, three lines of defense, audit/compensation/nomination committee operations, independent-director governance, stakeholder communication, IPO governance upgrade, and family-business professionalization. Use for board-structure design, independent-director selection, three-lines implementation, IPO governance preparation, major governance incidents (fraud, scandal, insider trading), or family-business corporatization. Triggers: 『董事會組成』『獨董沒發揮功能』『三道防線』『上櫃治理補強』『家族法人化』『委員會分工』『ESG 治理』『審計委員會』『薪酬委員會』『提名委員會』. For Taiwan EMBA corporate-governance/finance/law/ESG cases. Focuses on listed-company and IPO practice; governance theory: use Asgard `grad-governance`; 9-box/繼任規劃/接班人才盤點: use `ops-talent-strategy`; COSO ERM/風險地圖/風險委員會運作: use `biz-erm`.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts corporate board of directors meeting minutes. Triggers on "board minutes", "minutes of board meeting", "board of directors meeting minutes", "corporate minutes", "board resolutions", or "bylaws compliance".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produces a structured, objective summary of corporate board meetings covering metadata, quorum, attendance, conflicts, resolutions with vote counts, committee reports, and significant corporate actions. Use when summarizing board minutes, creating a corporate governance record, or preparing a post-meeting recap for officers, shareholders, or regulators.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-reference public records to investigate companies, contracts, sanctions, property, and litigation. Match names across sources, label confidence levels, and build structured findings linked to original records, with optional statistical analysis of event timing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Researching company control and corporate filings
• Checking entities against sanctions and offshore records
• Comparing lobbying records with government contracts

Create a horizontal-swipe HTML deck for an operating review, organizing growth, cash burn, and sustainability around leadership decisions. Use supplied layouts and the active design system to produce a single index.html file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing an operating review for leadership
• Creating a board pre-read for a decision
• Presenting growth and cash burn in HTML slides

Create an HTML quarterly business review for executive decisions, covering progress, stalled work, and resource reallocation requests. The template keeps slides visually consistent with cream backgrounds, cobalt blue accents, and coordinated layouts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing quarterly business reviews for executives
• Explaining resource reallocation requests
• Creating investor reports or advisory updates

Build an HTML strategy presentation that lays out options, risks, and a recommendation for an executive decision. The template uses deep navy, paper tones, and muted gold for formal board and strategy discussions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing options for a monetization decision
• Preparing a board presentation with a clear recommendation
• Organizing a strategy briefing for executives

Look up Ondo tokens representing US stocks through Binance Web3. Retrieve prices, holder counts, company details, trading restrictions, and candlestick data, and compare token prices with underlying stock prices while accounting for shares represented by each token.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Research available tokenized US stocks
• Check trading restrictions and their reasons
• Compare token and underlying stock prices

Prepare concise Word profiles of public or private companies using S&P Capital IQ data. It adapts business and financial information for equity research, M&A, acquisition planning, or sales meetings, with checked calculations and clearly marked missing data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing a company summary for equity research
• Profiling an M&A or acquisition target
• Preparing company background for a sales meeting