본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills

'corroboration' 검색 결과

13건 · 관련도순

Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GarethManning/education-agent-skills8842026년 8월 29일 업데이트

Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles922026년 9월 24일 업데이트

Investigate suspicious domains, scams, impersonation, and malicious activity using public sources. Preserve source details, check leads against independent evidence, and prepare a threat intelligence handoff that records confidence, verification status, and remaining gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Check public phishing reports for a suspicious domain
  • Investigate scam or impersonation leads from public posts
  • Prepare verified evidence for a security investigation
zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill4.3만2026년 9월 22일 업데이트

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

elementalsouls/Claude-OSINT2.8천2026년 10월 10일 업데이트

Design formative assessments that make students' historical thinking visible — revealing whether they source, close-read, contextualise, and corroborate. Use when assessing historical thinking skills or planning a diagnostic.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GarethManning/education-agent-skills8842026년 8월 29일 업데이트

Adapt a historical primary source for classroom use — modifying complexity and length while preserving features for sourcing, close reading, and corroboration. Use when a primary source is too complex for the target age group.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GarethManning/education-agent-skills8842026년 8월 29일 업데이트

Design a document set for a document-based lesson — selecting and sequencing sources for analytical tension around a central question. Use when assembling sources for a new lesson or when an existing set produces flat responses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GarethManning/education-agent-skills8842026년 8월 29일 업데이트

Design a document set for a document-based lesson — selecting and sequencing sources for analytical tension around a central question. Use when assembling sources for a new lesson or when an existing set produces flat responses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles922026년 9월 24일 업데이트

Adapt a historical primary source for classroom use — modifying complexity and length while preserving features for sourcing, close reading, and corroboration. Use when a primary source is too complex for the target age group.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles922026년 9월 24일 업데이트

Design formative assessments that make students' historical thinking visible — revealing whether they source, close-read, contextualise, and corroborate. Use when assessing historical thinking skills or planning a diagnostic.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles922026년 9월 24일 업데이트

Primary and secondary source analysis for historical reasoning. Covers source classification, sourcing (author/context/purpose), corroboration across multiple sources, contextualization within time and place, and bias detection. Use when evaluating historical evidence, assessing source reliability, or constructing evidence-based historical arguments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026년 7월 20일 업데이트

Ensemble SOLID review — fans the ruleset across overlapping focused workers over the same code, then reduces by corroboration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Design pattern for converting rule-following, checklist, or rubric skills into a fan-out map-reduce ensemble of parallel rigid sub-agents with corroboration-weighted merge; worker model tier and diversity are knobs matched to inference load and stakes, not fixed values. Apply when creating or refactoring a skill or agent that applies 10+ independent criteria in a single pass. Triggers on: 'review against a checklist', 'fan out', 'map reduce review', 'ensemble', 'split the rules', 'apply rubric', or any large ruleset being applied by one agent in one pass. NOT for tight single-pass transforms or rulesets under 5 criteria.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills672026년 10월 20일 업데이트