9건 · 관련도순
Statistical testing for differentially abundant proteins between conditions. Covers limma and MSstats workflows with multiple testing correction. Use when identifying proteins with significant abundance changes between experimental groups.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Differential abundance testing for microbiome data using compositionally-aware methods like ALDEx2, ANCOM-BC2, and MaAsLin2. Use when identifying taxa that differ between experimental groups while accounting for the compositional nature of microbiome data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Differential abundance testing for microbiome data using compositionally-aware methods like ALDEx2, ANCOM-BC2, and MaAsLin2. Use when identifying taxa that differ between experimental groups while accounting for the compositional nature of microbiome data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Statistical testing for differentially abundant proteins between conditions. Covers preprocessing (log2 transformation, normalization), limma and DEqMS workflows with empirical Bayes moderation, fold change shrinkage for accurate effect size estimation, and Python alternatives. Use when identifying proteins with significant abundance changes between experimental groups.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Unified analysis pipeline for affinity-based proteomics platforms — Olink (PEA, NPX) and SomaLogic SomaScan (SOMAmer, RFU). Platform-aware QC, normalisation, differential abundance, volcano plots, heatmaps, and PCA.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end 16S/ITS amplicon workflow from demultiplexed FASTQ to a consensus differential-abundance result, orchestrating cutadapt primer removal, per-run DADA2 ASV inference (learnErrors/mergeSequenceTables/removeBimeraDenovo), region-matched taxonomy assignment, a SEPP/Greengenes2 tree, alpha/beta diversity at a declared sampling depth (phyloseq/vegan, adonis2 paired with betadisper), compositional DA as a consensus of >=2 tools (ALDEx2/ANCOM-BC2) on unrarefied counts, and optional PICRUSt2 functional prediction gated on NSTI. Covers the stage-ordering decisions (primers before truncation, per-run error model, rarefy for diversity not DA, predicted potential not activity) and defers each per-step choice to the six microbiome skills. Use when staging an amplicon study end to end or chaining ASV inference, taxonomy, diversity, and differential abundance. For shotgun reads see workflows/metagenomics-pipeline.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.