8건 · 관련도순
Build discernment habits: nudges and checklists for evaluating claims, spotting manipulation, and thinking clearly under pressure. Use when you want better judgment about what to believe and share.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
/ai-fluency-check と入力されたときだけ起動するAIフルーエンシー自己評価スキル。Anthropicの4D AI Fluency Framework（Delegation / Description / Discernment / Diligence）に基づく18項目のルーブリックを使い、対話的に自己評価する。過去の評価記録と比較して成長を可視化し、研究根拠にもとづく改善アドバイスと参考文献を提供する。ユーザーが /ai-fluency-check と明示的に入力した場合のみ使用すること。自動起動・推測起動は一切しない。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
/coach-me と入力されたときだけ起動する、Learning by Doing コーチングスキル。現在の会話を分析し、Anthropicの4D AIフルーエンシーフレームワーク（Delegation / Description / Discernment / Diligence）に基づいて「うまくできていた点」「改善できる点」「次回に使えるプロンプト例」をフィードバックする。オプションで /coach-me 詳細 または /coach-me --detail と入力すると次元ごとの深掘りフィードバックを提供。自動起動は一切しない。ユーザーが /coach-me と明示的に入力した場合のみ使用すること。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI의 조언·계획·견적·분석 뒤에 짧은 질문 두세 개를 덧붙입니다. 답변의 구체적인 내용을 바탕으로 행동 전에 숫자·논리·누락 정보를 검토하도록 돕습니다.
Design a variation theory task using contrast, separation, and fusion to teach critical features of a concept. Use when students confuse similar concepts or fail to discern key distinctions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design a variation theory task using contrast, separation, and fusion to teach critical features of a concept. Use when students confuse similar concepts or fail to discern key distinctions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.