'experiment' 검색 결과

Turn a research experiment plan into training and evaluation code, run a small setup check, and launch GPU experiments. Collect initial metrics and update progress records so the results are ready for further review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Implementing experiments from a written plan
• Checking a small run before full GPU experiments
• Collecting baseline and main-method results

Turn a vague research direction into a focused proposal and a detailed experiment roadmap. This workflow connects method refinement with validation planning, producing review records, an experiment tracker, and a summary of what to run next.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turn a rough research idea into a focused proposal
• Plan experiments that test the paper's claims
• Organize experiment order, budget, and decision points

A platform decision framework for experimentation. When to use Statsig vs PostHog vs GrowthBook vs Optimizely vs Amplitude vs Eppo vs Kameleoon. How to migrate between them. How to coordinate when multi-platform is genuinely warranted. The decisions that compound for years and the ones you can defer. Triggers on which experimentation platform, choose Statsig vs PostHog, evaluate experimentation tools, switch experimentation platform, migrate from Optimizely, consolidate experimentation tools, multi-platform experimentation, experimentation platform decision, ab test platform selection, feature flag platform vs experiment platform, warehouse-native experiments, vendor lock-in experimentation. Also triggers when a team is asking about cost, governance, or migration cost across experimentation tools, or when an evaluation is starting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan A/B tests to compare page changes using clear hypotheses and meaningful measures. The skill helps define sample size, duration, traffic allocation, and result interpretation, and organize a continuing program of prioritized experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare headlines or signup buttons
• Estimate test sample size and duration
• Interpret results and possible adverse effects

Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Running experiments out of the data warehouse instead of via dedicated experiment platforms. SQL-based assignment, exposure logging discipline, metric definitions in dbt models, statistical analysis in SQL or Python, variance reduction with CUPED, sequential testing, and the operational tradeoffs vs platforms like Statsig and Optimizely. Triggers on warehouse-native experimentation, run experiments in BigQuery, run experiments in Snowflake, dbt experiments, SQL t-test, CUPED variance reduction, exposure log, sample ratio mismatch, sequential testing, mSPRT, doubly robust estimation, build vs buy experimentation. Also triggers when the team is choosing between platform and warehouse, building warehouse-native experiment infrastructure, auditing one, or running an experiment with a custom metric the platform cannot handle.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnoses bias, anomalies, and strange-looking results on a specific PostHog experiment. Covers empty / 0-exposure experiments, sample ratio mismatch, identity fragmentation, multi-variant exposure, uneven-split exclusion bias, significance traps (peeking, A/A, Bayesian vs Frequentist), PostHog-vs-SQL discrepancies, and surprises after mid-run edits. Symptom-driven dispatch to the right diagnostic. TRIGGER when: user asks 'is my experiment biased?' or 'why 0 exposures?', references the bias banner, says a variant looks strange / wrong / off, sees significance flipping, notices PostHog numbers disagreeing with their SQL, sees an A/A test showing significance, or reports surprises after mid-run edits. DO NOT TRIGGER when: creating a new experiment (use creating-experiments), only configuring rollout (use configuring-experiment-rollout) or metrics (use configuring-experiment-analytics), or only asking lifecycle questions (use managing-experiment-lifecycle).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrator for the experimentation skill suite — turn assumptions and product questions into rigorous, well-instrumented experiments and decision-grade readouts. Routes through backlog → spec → runbook → readout based on user need and existing artefacts. Platform-agnostic with PostHog as the primary binding. Load when the user asks to design an experiment, A/B test something, set up an experiment, run a holdout, test a hypothesis, decide what to test next, read out experiment results, analyse a test, or says "should we A/B test this", "experiment on the landing page", "is this lift real", "ship or kill this test", "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "test the pricing page", "validate this with an experiment".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create and analyze AI model evaluation experiments in Arize using the ax CLI, a command-line tool. Collect real model outputs, export results, compare evaluation scores, and identify examples where a new model performs worse.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Comparing models on the same evaluation dataset
• Finding examples that perform worse after a model change
• Exporting experiment results for further analysis

Plan controlled failure experiments to uncover system weaknesses. Define normal operating metrics, estimate affected users and reliability risk, set abort and recovery conditions, and turn experiment results into a structured review with follow-up actions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing a controlled failure experiment
• Estimating affected users and reliability risk
• Planning a team failure response exercise

Plans, builds, runs, and analyzes fault injection experiments with AWS Fault Injection Service (AWS FIS) to validate application resilience through chaos engineering. Covers experiment templates (actions, targets, stop conditions), the FIS actions catalog and action selection, the scenario library (AZ power interruption, cross-Region connectivity, EC2/EKS/EBS stress), experiment lifecycle and monitoring, logging and reports, multi-account experiments, the experiment IAM role, and blast-radius safety. Applies when a user mentions AWS FIS or fault injection, asks what experiment to run for a failure mode (AZ, Region, API errors/throttling, instance/pod/DB/cache failure, latency, packet loss), wants to author an experiment template or CLI/CloudFormation, or needs to safely run chaos experiments in pre-production or production. For the broader resilience program across Resilience Hub and ARC, see aws-resilience-lifecycle; for ARC routing controls and zonal shift, see recovery-controller-setup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Operator-side analysis of historical ML experiment PRs in Senpai research tracks. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: analyze experiments, categorize PRs, bucket experiments, summarize what's been tried, understand experiment history, review merged vs closed results, or asks "what experiments have we run / worked / failed". Also triggers for: "pull the latest experiments", "what's been tried so far", "category breakdown of PRs", "which experiments succeeded", "noam track analysis". When a branch name is mentioned (e.g. "noam branch", "on the noam branch"), pass it as the base branch to scope the fetch to just those PRs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics. TRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Organize experiment photos, audio, and notes into Markdown logs with structured metadata. Assign experiment and sample batch IDs, archive original attachments, and optionally connect records to Feishu group messages or an Obsidian notebook.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning experiment photos and voice notes into consistent logs
• Tracking the same sample batch across multiple experiments
• Archiving original files with links from experiment logs

Improve code through repeated experiments against a measurable target, such as execution time or memory use. After defining scope and constraints, the agent tests changes, keeps improvements, reverts unsuccessful attempts, and logs results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reduce execution time through measured code experiments
• Optimize memory use or bundle size
• Compare changes using benchmark results

Check experimental results before making research claims. A fresh reviewer examines reference data, score calculations, result files, and evaluation scope, then produces an evidence-based report showing which claims are supported and which need qualification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking results before writing a paper
• Verifying reference data and score calculations
• Matching reported numbers to result files

Launch machine learning experiments on local GPUs, remote servers, Vast.ai, or Modal. It checks the configured environment, deploys code, saves logs, and verifies startup, with optional W&B metric logging and automatic Vast.ai result collection and instance cleanup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Run training jobs on a local GPU
• Deploy experiments to an SSH server
• Run experiments on Vast.ai and collect results

Turn a research proposal into an experiment plan tied to specific paper claims. Define comparisons, evaluation measures, tests that remove individual components, run order, and compute estimates, with a written plan and tracker for execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning a research proposal into concrete experiments
• Designing comparisons and component-removal tests
• Prioritizing runs within a compute budget

Run batches of machine learning experiments on remote GPUs over SSH, varying settings and random seeds. The skill schedules jobs, tracks progress, retries GPU memory failures, and cleans up leftover sessions before starting subsequent batches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Run experiments across multiple random seeds
• Test combinations of model settings
• Chain teacher training and student distillation

Manage machine learning experiments with MLflow by recording settings, metrics, files, and trained models. Covers experiment comparison, model version management, reproducible project configurations, and deployment workflows across local and cloud environments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Recording experiment settings and evaluation results
• Comparing model performance across experiments
• Managing model versions for production use

Turn A/B tests and product experiment records into decision reports. Organize hypotheses, setup, and metrics, explain findings and uncertainty, then recommend shipping, iterating, extending, or stopping, with follow-up experiments based only on supplied data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Deciding whether to launch a tested product change
• Reviewing growth or pricing experiments
• Assessing onboarding changes or email experiments

How to read experiment results without fooling yourself. Confidence intervals, p-values, multiple testing, sequential testing, CUPED, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metrics, network effects, dashboard reconciliation, and the interpretation failures that produce confidently wrong shipping decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is reading a finished experiment result panel and about to make a ship, kill, or iterate decision, or when an experiment number does not match the dashboard number. Triggers on read experiment results, result panel, ship or kill decision, p-value, confidence interval, statistical significance, multiple testing, peeking, sequential testing, CUPED, variance reduction, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metric, network effects, inconclusive test, experiment versus dashboard mismatch. Use `experiment-design` instead when the test has not run yet and the question is hypothesis, sample size, duration, or what to test.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.