23건 · 관련도순
Plan user research by matching methods to study goals and explaining participant numbers and confidence. Synthesize tagged observations into recurring findings, distinguish isolated anecdotes, and organize evidence so research results can be found and reused.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan and evaluate product A/B tests with clear hypotheses, success metrics, sample size estimates, and stopping rules. Rank proposed experiments and interpret results using effect sizes and uncertainty to support practical product decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "test our messaging before we scale it", "design a message-market-fit panel", or "run a 5-second comprehension test on our new tagline"; produces a message-test design spec — hypothesis, panel and recruit criteria, comprehension / 5-second / message-market-fit (Wynter-style) protocols, stimulus set drawn from the canon, success thresholds, and a stop/revise decision rule — for the TALE Evaluate phase so the message is validated before any paid scale. It designs the test; it never runs the experiment or adjudicates a claim. Not for running the panel or A/B experiment — use send-experiment-designer or ad-test-designer; not for analyzing the results — use performance-analyzer; not for authoring the message itself — use message-system-architect. 消息测试/理解度测试/面板设计/五秒测试/消息市场契合
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "design an email A/B test", "set up a multivariate subject/CTA test", "run a send-time test", "build a hold-out group", or "is this email result statistically and practically material?"; produces a falsifiable hypothesis, one-variable-per-cell matrix, sample-size/MDE/duration/power plan, and an effect/uncertainty read from own ESP data. Applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the helper never chooses a business action. Not for EQS/vetoes or writing the email. 邮件AB测试设计/多变量测试/发送时间测试/留出组/显著性判定
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "write the email", "draft subject lines", or "build email creative"; produces the pre-click unit — subject-line variants + preheader, body copy, one clear CTA, and a plain-text alt — message-matched to the destination page and claims-ledger-aware. Not for pre-scoring or ranking subject-line variants (spam/truncation/render pre-score) — use subject-line-lab; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor; not for the multi-step flow — use email-sequence-designer; not for the A/B test plan — use send-experiment-designer. 邮件文案/主题行/邮件创意
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "generate subject line variants", "pre-score my subject lines", or "will this subject get truncated / trigger spam filters"; produces a labeled subject + preheader variant set and a per-variant heuristic pre-score card — spam-trigger flags, length/truncation across desktop + mobile, emoji-count, and the inbox preview render (from-name + subject + preheader) — before any test is run. Not for the body copy or CTA — use email-creative-builder; not for the A/B test design or significance read — use send-experiment-designer; not for the profile-weighted EQS or the S1/S2/N1/D1 vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件主题行生成/主题行预打分/截断与垃圾词检查
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Experiment design reference for problem-class framing, Minimum Viable Experiment coaching, hypothesis formation, vetting and red flags, and experiment readiness. Use when translating a stated business outcome into candidate data-science problem classes, or when framing, vetting, scoping, or evaluating an experiment of any kind, including data feasibility, architecture, LLM, performance, use-case, UX, prototyping, and hardware experiments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A discipline for designing experiments (A/B tests, multivariate, holdouts) so the results actually answer the question you asked. Hypothesis writing, sample size, duration, segment analysis, running discipline, matching a result to a pre-committed decision rule, and the common failure modes that produce confidently wrong shipping decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is planning a test that has not run yet: framing a hypothesis, sizing the sample, setting duration, choosing guardrails, or deciding whether something is worth testing at all. Triggers on design an experiment, experiment plan, A/B test, split test, multivariate test, holdout, experiment hypothesis, sample size, minimum detectable effect, MDE, test duration, guardrail metric, no peeking, pre-committed decision rule, is this worth testing. Use `experimentation-analytics` instead when the test has already run and the question is how to read the result panel.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
How to read experiment results without fooling yourself. Confidence intervals, p-values, multiple testing, sequential testing, CUPED, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metrics, network effects, dashboard reconciliation, and the interpretation failures that produce confidently wrong shipping decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is reading a finished experiment result panel and about to make a ship, kill, or iterate decision, or when an experiment number does not match the dashboard number. Triggers on read experiment results, result panel, ship or kill decision, p-value, confidence interval, statistical significance, multiple testing, peeking, sequential testing, CUPED, variance reduction, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metric, network effects, inconclusive test, experiment versus dashboard mismatch. Use `experiment-design` instead when the test has not run yet and the question is hypothesis, sample size, duration, or what to test.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Framework for running single-variable cold email experiments. Defines experiment types (list-only, copy-only, combined), confidence weighting, minimum sample sizes, and success criteria. Use when the user wants to improve a campaign, test a new list vs old one, or compare copy variants. Prevents the
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user wants to design experiments, plan ablation studies, structure baselines, or create incremental evaluation strategies. Triggers on phrases like "design ablation", "plan experiment", "what experiments should I run", "baseline comparison", or "experiment matrix".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Best practices for designing reproducible experiments
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design robust experiments to test product hypotheses. Define metrics, sample size, and success criteria.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design rigorous experiments — hypotheses, controls, randomization, power analysis, and preregistration. Use when planning any study where you need trustworthy causal conclusions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision. For lean build-measure-learn product experiments without the statistics, use experiment-design instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design product experiments to test hypotheses. Use when the user says "run an experiment", "A/B test this", "build-measure-learn", "validate this assumption", "test this hypothesis", "we don't know if this will work", "minimum viable test", "lean experiment", or wants to reduce risk before fully building a feature - even if they don't explicitly say "experiment". For sample sizes, power calculations and significance testing, use ab-test-design instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Benchmark multi-agent coordination systems with experiment design, power analysis, human rating protocols, bootstrap confidence intervals, and reproducible reporting. Use for salvage latency, recovery fidelity, coordination overhead, and protocol comparison studies. NOT for ML model benchmarking, web-product A/B testing, survey design, or general-purpose data science.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Orchestrate an end-to-end data analysis or machine learning project from decision framing through reproducible handoff. Use when a request spans multiple lifecycle stages or an ambiguous modeling request must become a decision-ready result; use narrower audit or experiment-design skills for isolated reviews.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "generate subject line variants", "pre-score my subject lines", or "will this subject get truncated / trigger spam filters"; produces a labeled subject + preheader variant set and a per-variant heuristic pre-score card — spam-trigger flags, length/truncation across desktop + mobile, emoji-count, and the inbox preview render (from-name + subject + preheader) — before any test is run. Not for the body copy or CTA — use email-creative-builder; not for the A/B test design or significance read — use send-experiment-designer; not for the profile-weighted EQS or the S1/S2/N1/D1 vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件主题行生成/主题行预打分/截断与垃圾词检查
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "design an email A/B test", "set up a multivariate subject/CTA test", "run a send-time test", "build a hold-out group", or "is this email result statistically and practically material?"; produces a falsifiable hypothesis, one-variable-per-cell matrix, sample-size/MDE/duration/power plan, and an effect/uncertainty read from own ESP data. Applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the helper never chooses a business action. Not for EQS/vetoes or writing the email. 邮件AB测试设计/多变量测试/发送时间测试/留出组/显著性判定
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "test our messaging before we scale it", "design a message-market-fit panel", or "run a 5-second comprehension test on our new tagline"; produces a message-test design spec — hypothesis, panel and recruit criteria, comprehension / 5-second / message-market-fit (Wynter-style) protocols, stimulus set drawn from the canon, success thresholds, and a stop/revise decision rule — for the TALE Evaluate phase so the message is validated before any paid scale. It designs the test; it never runs the experiment or adjudicates a claim. Not for running the panel or A/B experiment — use send-experiment-designer or ad-test-designer; not for analyzing the results — use performance-analyzer; not for authoring the message itself — use message-system-architect. 消息测试/理解度测试/面板设计/五秒测试/消息市场契合
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "write the email", "draft subject lines", or "build email creative"; produces the pre-click unit — subject-line variants + preheader, body copy, one clear CTA, and a plain-text alt — message-matched to the destination page and claims-ledger-aware. Not for pre-scoring or ranking subject-line variants (spam/truncation/render pre-score) — use subject-line-lab; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor; not for the multi-step flow — use email-sequence-designer; not for the A/B test plan — use send-experiment-designer. 邮件文案/主题行/邮件创意
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rigorous benchmarking of multi-agent coordination systems: experiment design, statistical analysis, human evaluation protocols, and reproducible reporting. NOT FOR ML model evaluation (use llm-evaluation-harness), A/B testing for web products, survey design, or general data science.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.