'falsification' 검색 결과

Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design or review identification strategy for the sewage-house-prices project. Produces strategy memos with estimand, assumptions, pseudo-code, robustness plan, falsification tests, and referee objection anticipation. This skill should be used when asked to "design the strategy", "identify the effect", "write a strategy memo", or "think through identification".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigates network, streaming and protocol failures with falsification-first layered experiments, the general fallback for unknown root causes. Use for ECONNRESET / RST_STREAM / SSE stalls, CDN/CGNAT timeouts or certificate errors, throughput collapse where everything returns 200 but transfers crawl, or LAN identity/topology mysteries. Not for known Tailscale/TUN/DNS/proxy-path conflicts (use tunnel-doctor).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Render a two-host podcast ad from a brand config and dialogue script. Includes the working planner, full-frame and split-screen assembly, captions from measured character timings, brand end card, approved paid-step adapters, and 65 quality-check falsification cases. Use for short conversational ads with two stable hosts in one room.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building, backtesting, operating, or scaling automated trading on prediction markets (Kalshi or similar) — evidence-gated methodology, live-execution safety rails, and falsification protocols distilled from a real live-money campaign

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

当用户需要验证一个信念/理论/策略/商业模式的正确性、在做决策前想检验逻辑、或在问"怎么判断这个观点对不对""这个方案有没有逻辑漏洞""怎么系统地检验一个想法"时激活。 核心信号：用户需要对某个命题做系统性的逻辑验证，而非直觉判断。 不适用于：纯情感判断、不需要逻辑验证的常识性问题、时间紧迫的直觉决策。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Operationalizes Richards Heuer's CIA-tradition technique for systematically narrowing among multiple hypotheses against evidence. Builds an explicit hypothesis-vs-evidence matrix and focuses on disconfirmation rather than confirmation — the central insight: hypotheses cannot be proven, only disconfirmed; the surviving hypothesis is the one with the least disconfirming evidence. Spawns parallel hypothesizers (in isolation, across hypothesis-generation angles) and parallel evidence-gatherers (across evidence classes), then synthesizes into a matrix, diagnosticity analysis, sensitivity analysis, and falsification milestones. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a targeted fresh-eyes blunder pass over code, specs, plans, reviews, closure gates, or skill edits. Use when asked to reread with fresh eyes, find obvious bugs, catch mistakes/oversights/omissions, check for embarrassing misses, or do a second independent pass before closure. Use it as the final falsification/check pass for another workflow, not as a substitute for implementation or verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.