1.7천건 · 관련도순
Track unresolved legal and regulatory gaps by age and significance. Review outstanding issues, close resolved gaps with a resolution note, or record a decision to accept a risk together with its rationale and the person accepting it.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Track gaps between regulatory requirements and company policies, including owners, deadlines, and remediation status. Surface overdue and aging items, record resolutions or accepted risks, and prepare Slack notifications that require explicit confirmation before sending.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Query, display, and resolve reconciliation gaps from the TRES Finance MCP connector. Trigger this skill ONLY when the user explicitly requests to view or close reconciliation gaps — for example: "show me the reconciliation gaps", "close the recon gaps", "view gaps for today", "plug the reconciliation gaps for ETH", "fix the gaps for USDC and BTC". Do NOT trigger for general balance queries, transaction history, or ledger browsing. Covers the full workflow: confirming the target date, optionally filtering by asset, fetching gap data, enriching with fiat and on-chain balances, rendering an HTML dashboard where each gap row has copy-prompt buttons (Plug / Auto-fill) — clicking copies a ready-to-paste Claude prompt for that gap. The user pastes it in the chat and Claude executes the action. Ends with a data collect once the user is done.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare a proposed policy revision to address a specific regulatory gap. Show deletions, additions, reasons, and verification flags in a separate review memo, keeping edits limited to affected sections for the policy owner's review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find code that lacks test coverage and get suggestions for tests to add next. Focus on a chosen path, inspect gaps against a coverage threshold, or use a background worker for recurring checks after feature changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Identify gaps between current and desired state. Use when the user says "gap analysis", "what's missing", "current vs future state", "where are the gaps", "capability gap", "maturity assessment", "fit-gap analysis", "what needs to change", "compare current to target", "readiness assessment" - even if they don't explicitly say "gap analysis".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detects methodological gaps across study design, analysis, validation, bias control, reproducibility, and implementation readiness within a biomedical research area. Use this skill when a user wants to identify what current studies are still methodologically missing, which weaknesses are most consequential, and what upgrade path would produce a stronger next-step study. Always separate design gaps, analysis gaps, validation gaps, and reproducibility gaps. Never treat technical complexity as methodological rigor.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when scoring a list of business or solution requirements against the *actual* capabilities of a specific Salesforce org so each row can be classified Standard / Configuration / Low-Code / Custom / Unfit, given an effort tier (S/M/L/XL), a risk tag, and an AppExchange suggestion when applicable. Trigger keywords: fit gap salesforce requirements, score requirements against salesforce capabilities, salesforce capability matrix, classify requirement as standard config custom, fit-gap effort tier, AppExchange alternative for requirement. NOT for requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for architecture decisions on the GAP rows (use architect/solution-design-patterns and standards/decision-trees/). NOT for license or edition selection (use architect/license-optimization-strategy and architect/org-edition-and-feature-licensing). NOT for OmniStudio-specific fit-gap (use architect/omnistudio-vs-standard-decision).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare job requirements with your current skills and experience to identify learning priorities. Get a report with ranked gaps, study resources found through web searches, estimated learning time, and a recommended study sequence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare new or changed privacy regulations with current policies and practices. Identify whether the rules apply, list missing requirements, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with owners and due dates, documenting compliant areas as well.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare AI regulations or guidance with existing company policies and practices. Determine applicability, identify missing requirements, and create a prioritized remediation plan with owners and deadlines, while highlighting legal uncertainties that need attorney judgment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Identifies real, evidence-audited, topic-specific research gaps in medical research by first retrieving and verifying literature from trusted sources, then mapping the current evidence landscape, rejecting pseudo-gaps, and converting only medium/high-confidence gaps into study-ready research opportunities. Always require real literature retrieval before formal gap claims. Never fabricate references, metadata, or findings.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when asked to set up, install, or refine an agent quality framework in a repository (rules with gates, architecture contracts, proven-red tests, ratchets, playbooks), or when the user says "gap-trap", "gap-trap setup", "gap-trap refine", "gate the rules", or "make the agents' code match the rules".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a company starts a compliance programme and needs to know how far it is from a framework, and asks "run a gap analysis", "how ready are we for the audit", "baseline us against the framework", "what do we have and what is missing", "readiness assessment before we hire an auditor" or "how long until we can certify". Baselines what exists against the chosen framework from documents and records, rates each item by evidence rather than opinion, sizes every gap by effort and audit risk, and writes a gap register plus a prioritised summary with the long-lead items first.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produces a draft controls and gap pack from a requirement, regulation, standard or policy and the organisation's control descriptions: obligations broken out of the source text, the controls that appear to address each, apparent coverage, gaps, questions for control owners and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; owners and audit assess. Use when the user asks to "map this regulation to our controls", "run a controls gap analysis", "break this standard into obligations" or "where is our control coverage thin". Do not use for comparing a policy document against a standard, use policy-gap-review instead; to draft evidence requests from the mapped controls, use control-evidence-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compares one policy against one requirement set (standard, regulation, contract schedule or customer requirement) clause by clause and returns a draft gap review: each requirement element, the policy clause that appears to address it, an apparent match state, and every gap as a question with the clause reference on both sides. Never concludes that the policy complies; the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "gap our policy against the standard", "map this policy to the regulation clause by clause", "check the security policy against the customer's contract schedule", "compare our policy with the new edition" or "where does our policy fall short of the requirements". Do not use for mapping a requirement to the operating controls that implement it, use controls-gap-pack instead; for what a regulatory change means for the organisation, use regulatory-change-impact-note. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Verify the witness chain, a linked record of evidence, for a Cognitum Seed device. Check for missing recording periods and broken hash links, report an integrity score, and save detected gaps for auditing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review and fix Flexbox layouts with overflowing text, uneven item widths, or inconsistent spacing. Check rendered results across screen sizes and interaction states, then adjust sizing rules, spacing, and text overflow settings.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decide what to include, omit, and prioritize on a resume or CV. Review existing content against the target country, industry, and career stage, including personal details, education, employment gaps, section order, and document length.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Map threat groups’ documented attack techniques in MITRE ATT&CK Navigator. Creates visual layers and heatmaps, compares groups, and highlights techniques missing from existing detection coverage to support security reporting and decisions about detection priorities.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Measure Python SDK test coverage, the code exercised by tests, and identify meaningful gaps in user-visible behavior. Report proposed scenarios or add authorized tests, then verify the changes and report remaining gaps alongside coverage results.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare application pages, interactive components, API endpoints, and key user journeys with existing tests. Get a coverage matrix, an estimated coverage percentage, and a prioritized plan for missing tests with suggested templates and effort estimates.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.